Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 170 Accesses

Abstract

In order to turn the raw hit and trigger data read out in SNO\(+\) detector events into a 0\(\nu \beta \beta \) analysis, one must first determine what events produced them. Reconstruction is the process of inferring high level particle information from the data read out in each event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For events with \(r_{fit} < 1\) m. The total number of generated p.e. is around 20% larger, but not all PMTs receiving a p.e. will cross threshold.

  2. 2.

    The relation won’t hold exactly because the p.e. are not completely independent: a PMT is more likely to register a hit if it has already recieved a p.e. that did not cause it to cross charge threshold.

  3. 3.

    Note that the condition is absolute, rather than a comparison with \(\tilde{\mu }\), this means that variation between PMT efficiencies sets an upper limit on \(\mu \) for this technique. The method breaks down once \(\mu > 1/\Delta E\), where \(\Delta E\) is the maximum fractional difference between any two PMT efficiencies within the ensemble.

  4. 4.

    The first of two photons will, on average, arrive before a single photon.

  5. 5.

    i.e. all of the parameters in the hypothesis are specified.

References

  1. Coulter I (2013) Modelling and reconstruction of events in SNO\(+\) related to future searches for lepton and baryon number violation. Ph.D. thesis

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones P (2011) Background rejection for the neutrinoless double beta decay experiment SNO\(+\). Ph.D. thesis

    Google Scholar 

  3. Press William H, Teukolsky Saul A, Vetterling William T, Flannery Brian P (2007) Numerical recipes 3rd edition: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Olive KA et al (Particle Data Group) (2014) Review of particle physics. Chin Phys C38:090001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Franco D, Consolati G, Trezzi D (2011) Positronium signature in organic liquid scintillators for neutrino experiments. Phys Rev C-Nucl Phys 83(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.015504, arXiv:1011.5736

  6. Cowan G (1998) Statistical data analysis. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ff8ZyW0nlJAC

  7. Zhang H (2004) The optimality of naive bayes, vol 2

    Google Scholar 

  8. Back HO et al (2008) Pulse-shape discrimination with the counting test facility. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 584:98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.09.036. arXiv:0705.0239

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Dunger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dunger, J. (2019). Reconstruction. In: Event Classification in Liquid Scintillator Using PMT Hit Patterns. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31616-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics