Skip to main content

Relationships Among Surface Water Resources in the WR90, WR2005 and WR2012 Datasets of South Africa Using Mean Annual Runoff of Quaternary Catchments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 454 Accesses

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

Abstract

The study used mainly regression models as predictive tools among mean annual runoff (MAR) pertaining to hydrological dataset a of surface water resources (WR) of South Africa; i.e. WR90, WR2005 and WR2012. MAR is the hydrological catchment response. It was found that linear models were generally suitable to correlate any pair of datasets. The level of linearity was measured by the coefficient of determination (R2), hence correlation coefficient. The relatively high values of R2 of the models suggested that no drastic climatic variability occurred in the South African hydrology, i.e. with regard to the quaternary catchment (QC) of the different water management areas (WMAs). Hence, linear mathematical relationships could well describe the temporal evolution of surface water resources in South Africa, in terms of MAR as hydrological response, and indirectly could give an indication of the climate variability between the different datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bai Y, Chen Z, Xie J, Li C (2016) Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using multiscale deep feature learning with hybrid models. J Hydrol 532:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besaw LE, Rizzo DM, Bieman PR, Hackett WR (2010) Advances in ungauged streamflow prediction using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 386:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK, Chauhan S, Oza MP (2016) Modelling surface run-off and trends analysis over India. J Earth Syst Sci 125(6):1089–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshgi A, Schmitter P, Chui TFM, Babovic V (2015) Development of a modular streamflow model to quantify runoff contributions from different land uses in tropical urban environments using genetic programming. J Hydrol 525:711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton BJ, Bailey AK. Water resources of South Africa, 2005 Study (WR2005). User’s guide. Water research commission report no TT 513/11, Version 2, 2011. Pretoria, RSA

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Sanchis I, Lázaro R, Arnau-Rosalén E, Calvo-Cases A (2016) Rainfall timing and runoff: the influence of the criterion for rain event separation. J Hydrol Hydromech 64(3):226–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem UA, Nisar H, Ejaz N (2012) Development of empirical equations for the peak flood of the Chenab River using GIS. Arab J Sci Eng 37:945–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyari E, Ilunga F. Application of MLP neural network and M5P model tree in predicting streamflow: a case study of Luvuvhu catchment, South Africa. In: International conference on information and multimedia technology (ICMT 2010), Hong Kong, China, pp V3-156–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Qaderi M, Khaleqi MR, Dastorani MT, Chenari KS (2014) A comparative study of the efficiency of artificial neural network and multivariate regression in prioritizing climate factors affecting runoff generation in research plots: a case study of Sangane Station, Khorasan Razavi. Int Bull Water Resour Dev (IBWRD) (II)(04)-S.N. (07):XL1–LIII

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajsekhar D, Singh VP, Mishra AK (2015) Multivariate drought index: an information theory based approach for integrated drought assessment. J Hydrol 526:164–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel J, Coulibaly P, Metcalfe R (2011) Estimation of continuous streamflow in Ontario ungauged basins: comparison of regionalisation methods. J Hydrol Eng ASCE, 447–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP, Woolhiser DA (2002) Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology. J Hydrol Eng 7(4):270–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayfur G, Brocca L (2015) Fuzzy logic for rainfall-runoff modelling considering soil moisture. Water Resour Manag 29:519–3533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources of South Africa, 2012 Study (WR2012). http://waterresourceswr2012.co.za/. Accessed on 29 Sept 2016

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masengo Ilunga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ilunga, M. (2020). Relationships Among Surface Water Resources in the WR90, WR2005 and WR2012 Datasets of South Africa Using Mean Annual Runoff of Quaternary Catchments. In: Matondo, J.I., Alemaw, B.F., Sandwidi, W.J.P. (eds) Climate Variability and Change in Africa . Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31543-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics