Sustainable Energy
- 1 Citations
- 415 Downloads
Abstract
There are many factors to study in designing sustainable heat pump systems. Among them, the loading calculation dictates the system’s equipment selection. Calculating the loading demand for equipment sizing and selecting high-performance system are important in the process to plan for sustainable energy system. When sizing a heat pump, it is essential to determine the required cooling and heating capacity. To begin, this chapter examines factors affecting the heating/cooling demand for indoor thermal comfort. Key variables of thermal comfort are also discussed. To further investigate energy efficiency, coefficient of performance (COP) is examined. There are several methods that exist in determining COP. Equations and methods to determine COP are investigated. Examples of COP calculation on water-to-water heat pump and air-to-water heat pump are illustrated. The findings indicate that the COP level varies with types of heat pumps.
Keywords
Load calculation Thermal comfort Balance point temperature Heating capacity Cooling capacity Coefficient of performanceNomenclature
Seasonal energy efficiency ratio
- SEER
Seasonal energy efficiency ratio
- Q
Reference annual cooling demand
- QE
Annual electricity consumption
Subscript
- c
Cooling
- h
Heating
Nomenclature: Fanger’s comfort equation
- Ici
Thermal resistance of clothing
- M
Rate of metabolic rate production
- Pw
Water vapor pressure
- tmrt
Mean radiant temperature
- ta
Air temperature
- Va
Relative air velocity
Nomenclature: Heating and Cooling Capacity
- Cp
Specific heat at constant pressure, expressed in joules per kilogram and kelvin
- Ebal
Energy balance
- Ein
Energy into a system
- Eout
Energy out of a system
- \(\dot{m}\)
Mass flow rate
- QC
Cooling capacity, expressed in watts
- QH
Heating capacity, expressed in watts
- QHR
Heat recovery capacity, express in watts
- q
Volume flow rate, expressed in cubic meters per second
- r
Density, expressed in kilograms per cubic meter
- ∆t
Difference between inlet and outlet temperatures
Nomenclature: Coefficient of Performance (COP)
- COPC
COP of cooling
- COPH
COP of heating
- COPHC
COP of heating and cooling
- Qcd
Capacity of condenser (for heating)
- Qev
Capacity of evaporator (for cooling)
- Qhrc
Capacity of heat recovery of condenser (for heating)
- Winput
Total input power
- h1
Enthalpy in front of the compressor
- h2
Enthalpy behind the compressor
- h3
Enthalpy at the injection valve
References
- 1.European Commission (2016) Overview of support activities and projects of European Union and energy efficiency and renewable energy in the heating and cooling. European UnionGoogle Scholar
- 2.British Standard (BS EN 14522-1) (2013) Air conditioners, liquid chilling packages and heat pumps with electrically driven compressors for space heating and cooling. BSI Standards PublicationGoogle Scholar
- 3.Burdick A (2011) Strategy guideline: accurate heating and cooling load calculations. U.S. Department of Energy (Building Technologies Program)Google Scholar
- 4.Robin R (2010) Getting warmer: a field trial of heat pumps. The Energy Saving TrustGoogle Scholar
- 5.Li Y, Cheng Z (2003) A balance-point method for assessing the effect of natural ventilation on indoor particle concentrations. Atmos Environ 37:4277–4285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.En 14825 (2016) Air conditioners, liquid chilling packages and heat pumps, with electrically driven compressors, for space heating and rating at part load conditions and calculation of seasonal perform. British StandardGoogle Scholar
- 7.ANSI/ASHARE Standard 55 (2014) Thermal environment conditions for human occupancyGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hensen JLM (1990) Literature review on thermal comfort in transient condition. Build Environ 25(4):309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ekici C (2013) A review of thermal comfort and method of using Fanger’s PMV equation. In: 5th International symposium on measurement, analysis and modelling of human functions. Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fanger PO (1970) Thermal comfort, analysis and application in environmental engineering. Danish Technical Press, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- 11.Noel D, Rene T, Donatien N (2010) Thermal comfort: a review paper. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2626–2640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Dear RJ (2002) Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHARE Standard 55. Energy Build 34(6):549–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kwok A, Rakovich NB (2010) Addressing climate change in comfort standards. Build Environ 45:18–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Mui K, Chan W (2003) Adaptive comfort temperature model of air-conditioned building in Hong Kong. Build Environ 38:837–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Schiavon S, Melikov AK (2008) Energy saving and improved comfort by increased air movement. Energy Build 40:1954–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Cheng CC, Lee D (2016) Enabling smart air conditioning by sensor development: a review. Sensors 16(12):2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.British Standard (BS EN 14522-3) (2013) Air conditioners, liquid chilling packages and heat pumps with electrically driven compressors for space heating and cooling. BSI Standards PublicationGoogle Scholar
- 18.AHRI (550/590) (2015) Standard for performance rating of water-chilling and heat pump water-heating packages using the vapor compressor cycle. Air Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration InstituteGoogle Scholar
- 19.ASHARE Handbook (2017) Fundamentals 2.3Google Scholar
- 20.Shao S, Shi W, Li X, Ma J (2004) A new inverter heat pump operated all year round with domestic hot water. Energy Convers Manag 45:2255–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Shao S, Shi W, Li X, Cheng H (2004) Performance representation of variable-speed compressor for invert air conditioners based on experimental data. Int J Refrig 27(8):805–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Bonin J (2016) Heat pump planning handbook. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 23.Zogou O, Stamatelos A (1998) Effect of climatic conditions on the design optimization of heat pump systems for space heating and cooling. Energy Conserv Manage 39(7):609–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar