Skip to main content

Machine Learning Based Predictive Maintenance of Infrastructure Facilities in the Cryolithozone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Developments on Industrial Control Systems Resilience

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 255))

Abstract

This chapter provides some practical aspects and peculiarities of the use of Machine Learning based Predictive Maintenance for the infrastructure facilities in the cryolithozone. Some mathematical models of Machine Learning based Predictive Maintenance are described, which have shown their practical effectiveness. The solutions of several important problems of Predictive Maintenance for pipelines located in cryolithozone are considered, including: problem of leak detection from pipelines taking into account the possible damage to the pipeline foundation due melting of permafrost; problem of automatic classifying of defects that led to leaks; problem of prompt corrosion spot detection in the pipelines as well as problem of identifying the current state of the corrosion process in the pipeline. The problem of optimizing the procedure for incident tickets processing in the Predictive Maintenance system for oil pipelines was also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hashemian, H.M., Bean, W.C.: State-of-the-art predictive maintenance techniques. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60(10), 3480–3492 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2009.2036347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carnero, M.C.: Selection of diagnostic techniques and instrumentation in a predictive maintenance program. A case study. Decis. Support Syst. 38(4), 539–555 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Swanson, D.C.: A general prognostic tracking algorithm for predictive maintenance. In: 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542), Big Sky, MT, USA, vol. 6, pp. 2971–2977. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2001.931317 (2001)

  4. Zhou, X., Xi, L., Lee, J.: Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92(4), 530–534 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaiser, K.A., Gebraeel, N.Z.: Predictive maintenance management using sensor-based degradation models. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Hum. 39(4), 840–849 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grall, L. Dieulle, C.B., Roussignol, M.: Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 51(2), 141–150 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2002.1011518

  7. PricewaterhouseCoopers: https://cdn-sv1.deepsense.ai/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/pwc-predictive-maintenance-4-0.pdf

  8. Cline, B., Niculescu, R.S., Huffman, D., Deckel, B.: Predictive maintenance applications for machine learning. In: 2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Orlando, FL, pp. 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ram.2017.7889679

  9. Butte, S., Prashanth, A.R., Patil, S.: Machine learning based predictive maintenance strategy: a super learning approach with deep neural networks. In: 2018 IEEE Workshop on Microelectronics and Electron Devices (WMED), Boise, ID, pp. 1–5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/wmed.2018.8360836

  10. Timofeev, A.V., Denisov, V.M.: Multimodal heterogeneous monitoring of super-extended objects: modern view. recent advances in systems safety and security, 06/2016: chapter. In: Volume 62 of the series Studies in Systems, Decision and Control: pp. 97–116. Springer International Publishing, Berlin. ISBN: 978-3-319-32523-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32525-5_6

  11. Anger, C.: Hidden semi-Markov models for predictive maintenance of rotating elements. Technische Universität, Darmstadt (Ph.D. Thesis) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bredensteiner, E., Bennett, K.: Multicategory classification by support vector machines. Comput. Optim. Appl. 12, 53–79 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Krishnapuram, B., Shah, M., Smola, A.J., Aggarwal, C.C., Shen, D., Rastogi, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 13–17. ACM. pp. 785–794 (2016). arXiv:1603.02754. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

  14. American Society for Testing and Materials E 1211-97

    Google Scholar 

  15. European Committee for Standardization E1211-97: Standard practice for leak detection and location using surface-mounted acoustic emission sensors

    Google Scholar 

  16. Savina, A.V.: Analysis of the risk of accidents when justifying safe distances from the main pipelines of liquefied petroleum gas to objects with the presence of people. Ph.D. Thesis: 05.26.03. Scientific-Technical Center of Research Industrial Problems Security, Moscow, vol. 121, p. il (2013). RSL OD, 61 14-5/120

    Google Scholar 

  17. Safety Guide: Methodical recommendations for the quality risk analysis of accidents in hazardous production facilities of main oil pipelines and main oil products. Approved by Order of the Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision of June 17, 2016 n. 228: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/456007201 (2016)

  18. Annual Report on the Activity of the Federal Service on Environmental, Technological and Atomic Supervision in 2014: Federal Service for Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision of the Russian Federation, Moscow. http://www.gosnadzor.ru/public/annual_reports/ (2015)

  19. Timashev, S.A., Bushinskaya, A.V.: Probabilistic methods for predictive maintenance of pipeline systems. In: Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1–2, pp. 548-555 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Powers, D.M.W.: Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness & correlation). J. Mach. Learn. Technol. 2(1), 37–63 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrey V. Timofeev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Timofeev, A.V., Denisov, V.M. (2020). Machine Learning Based Predictive Maintenance of Infrastructure Facilities in the Cryolithozone. In: Pricop, E., Fattahi, J., Dutta, N., Ibrahim, M. (eds) Recent Developments on Industrial Control Systems Resilience. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 255. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31328-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics