Abstract
A central task of a state is to establish order within its territory. The mere creation of the state is justified by this statement. A proper order that allows citizens to develop in all dimensions is based upon the rule of law . An insecure environment (i.e. disorder) signals a weakness in the rule of law , which is further weakened as crime and violence unfold. Mexico has been suffering an insecurity crisis since 2007 – which is not unique, or even the worst in its recent history. It is, however, the worst insecurity crisis since the country’s democratization process began. The combination of a deficient rule of law , an ineffective war on drugs , a fiscal system disconnected from citizens’ preferences, and the democratization process itself, has provided fertile ground for a dramatic increase in crime and violence . Under these circumstances, strengthening the rule of law is paramount, yet conditions are such that improving it will prove problematic.
Vidal Romero is Professor at the Political Science Department at ITAM and Visiting Fellow (2018–2021) at the Latin America and Caribbean Centre (LACC) at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from Stanford University. He was visiting Professor at Stanford University (2012–13). Romero is Co-Director of ITAM’s Center of Studies on Security, Intelligence, and Governance. His current research examines the conditions under which governments can establish (democratic) order in their territories. He has collaborated on different research projects with the World Bank, the Wilson Center, México Evalúa, the National Endowment for Democracy, and the Inter-American Development Bank. Email: vromero@itam.mx.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Zepeda Gil (2018) for an excellent analysis of the main explanations for violence in Mexico.
- 2.
Available at: https://goo.gl/YM2qJY.
- 3.
An inelastic demand is one in which a change in price will have a smaller than proportional effect upon the quantity demanded. If demand is perfectly inelastic, a change in price will have no effect whatsoever upon the quantity sought.
- 4.
Data from to the National Survey on Victimization and Security Perception (ENVIPE) . Available at: https://goo.gl/htQTuy.
- 5.
Data from INEGI . Available at: https://goo.gl/uxrBXK.
- 6.
As reported by Etellekt Consulting to CNN in Spanish https://goo.gl/Ki7J3p. Other media outlets have reported similar figures.
References
Ahmad, N.; Hubickey, V.; McNamara, F. (2011). “La confianza en la Policía Nacional”, in: Perspectivas desde el Barómetro de las Américas, 59: 1–11.
Bates, R.H. (2001). Prosperity and Violence: The political economy of development (New York: W.W. Norton).
Blanco, L.R. (2013). “The impact of crime on trust in institutions in Mexico” in: European Journal of Political Economy, 32: 38–55.
Calderón, G.; Robles, G.; Díaz-Cayeros, A.; Magaloni, B. (2015). “The Beheading of Criminal Organizations and the Dynamics of Violence in Mexico”, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59, 8: 1455–1485.
Ceobanu, A.M.; Wood, C.H.; Ribeiro, L. (2010). “Crime victimization and public support for democracy: Evidence from Latin America”, in: International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 1: 56–78.
Dahl, R. (1971). Poliarchy (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Dell, M. (2015). “Trafficking networks and the Mexican drug war”, in: American Economic Review, 105, 6, 1, 738–79.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press).
Diaz-Cayeros, A.; McElwain, K.M.; Romero, V. (2010). Fiscal Decentralization and Particularistic Spending across Countries (Manuscript in preparation).
Eastwood, N.; Fox, E.; Rosmarin, A. (2016). A quiet revolution: Drug decriminalisation across the globe (London: Release).
Enciso, F. (2015). Nuestra historia narcótica (Mexico City: Editorial Debate).
Expert Group on the economics of drug policy (London: London School of Economics and Political Science).
Fernandez, K.E.; Kuenzi, M. (2010). “Crime and support for democracy in Africa and Latin America”, in: Political Studies, 58: 450–471.
Global Commission on Drug Policy (2018). “Regulation: The Responsible Control of Drugs” (Geneva: GCDP); at: https://goo.gl/7RvpFC.
Herrera González, V.; Hernández, M.; Oralia, S. (2017). Diagnóstico de las Haciendas Públicas Locales en México (Mexico City: Instituto Belisario Domínguez del Senado de la República).
Holland, A.C. (2013). “Right on crime? Conservative party politics and mano dura policies in El Salvador”, in: Latin American Research Review: 44–67.
Huntington, S. (1969). Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Krause, K. (2014). “Supporting the iron fist: Crime news, public opinion, and authoritarian crime control in Guatemala”, in: Latin American Politics and Society, 56, 1: 98–119.
Lessing, B. (2015). “Logics of violence in criminal war”, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 59, 8: 1, 486–1,516.
LSE IDEAS. (2014). Ending the Drug Wars (London: London School of Economics and Political Science).
LSE IDEAS. (2016). After the Drug Wars (London: London School of Economics and Political Science).
Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Magaloni, B.; Díaz-Cayeros, A.; Matanock, A.; Robles, G.; Romero, V. (2018). Living in Fear: The dynamics of extortion in Mexico’s drug war (Manuscript in preparation).
McAllister, W.B. (2012). Reflections on a Century of International Drug Control: Governing the global drug wars (London: London School of Economics and Political Science).
Miron, J.A.; Zwiebel, J. (1995). “The economic case against drug prohibition”, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 4: 175–192.
North, D.C. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History (New York: W.W. Norton and Company).
Osorio, J. (2011). Dynamic and structural determinants of drug violence in Mexico. Working paper; at: https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/evnts/media/OSORIO_Drug_Violence_111102.pdf.
Osorio, J. (2013). Democratization and Drug Violence in Mexico. Working paper, at: https://eventos.itam.mx/sites/default/files/eventositammx/eventos/aadjuntos/2014/01/democratizacion_and_drug_violence_osorio_appendix_1.pdf.
Pérez, O.J. (2003). “Democratic legitimacy and public insecurity: Crime and democracy in El Salvador and Guatemala”, in: Political Science Quarterly, 118, 4: 627–644.
Phillips, B. (2015). “How does leadership decapitation affect violence? The case of drug trafficking organizations in Mexico”, in: Journal of Politics, 77, 2: 324–336.
Poiré, A. (2011). “Los homicidios y la violencia del crimen organizado”, in: Nexos; at: https://goo.gl/VLpnds.
Quah, D.; Collins, J.; Atuesta Becerra, L.; Caulkins, J.; Csete, J.; Drucker, E.; Restrepo, P. (2014). Ending the Drug Wars: report of the LSE.
Rios, V. (2012). “How Government Structure Encourages Criminal Violence: The causes of Mexico’s drug war” (PhD dissertation, Harvard University).
Romero, V. (2015). “The political economy of progressive tax reforms in Mexico”, in: Mahon, J.E.; Bergman, M.; Arnson, C. (Eds.), Progressive Tax Reform and Equality in Latin America (Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center).
Romero, V. (2017). Money Laundering, Misaligned Incentives, and Violence. Working Paper Series 2017-002 (Mexico: ITAM).
Romero, V.; Magaloni, B.; Díaz-Cayeros, A. (2015). “The Mexican war on drugs: Crime and the limits of government persuasion”, in: International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27, 1: 125–137.
Romero, V.; Magaloni, B.; Díaz-Cayeros, A. (2016). “Presidential approval in hard times: Mexico’s war on crime”, in: Latin American Politics and Society, 58, 2: 100–123.
Thornton, M. (1991). “Alcohol prohibition was a failure”, in: Cato Institute Policy Analysis, 157; at: https://goo.gl/sieKxh.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2015). World Drug Report 2015. (New York: United Nations).
Valdés Castellanos, G. (2013). Historia del narcotráfico en México (Mexico City: Aguilar).
Weingast, B.R. (1997). “The political foundation of democracy and the Rule of Law”, in: American Political Science Review, 91, 2: 245–263.
Weingast, B.R.; Shepsle, K.A.; Johnsen, C.H. (1981). “The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics”, in: Journal of Political Economy 89, 4: 642–664.
Zepeda Gil, R. (2018). “Siete tesis explicativas sobre el aumento de la violencia en México”, in: Política y Gobierno, 25, 1: 185–211.
Zepeda Lecuona, G.; Jiménez Rodríguez, P. (2018). “Impunidad en homicidio doloso en México: Reporte 2018”, in: Este País (November); at: https://www.impunidadcero.org/uploads/app/articulo/87/contenido/1541455707N85.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Romero, V. (2020). Security. In: Le Clercq, J., Abreu Sacramento, J. (eds) Rebuilding the State Institutions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31314-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31314-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31313-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31314-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)