Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Defining Sustainability Criteria for Emerging Market Multinationals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Market Multinationals and Europe

Abstract

Literature and practice in interregional competition to attract new companies generally overlooks the question of whether these organizations operate sustainably and whether any efforts in attracting them are sustainable in terms of long-term existence. It is thus necessary to consider not only an organization’s long-term commitment towards a specific location but also general criteria for sustainable organizations, such as economical, ecological and social sustainability. Furthermore, (regional) headquarters have to be held responsible for their subsidiaries and partners along the value chain. While classic location incentives can attract new regional headquarters in the short term, we argue that classic sustainability criteria such as transparency and stakeholder-orientation suggest investments with long-term orientation. This, in connection with considerations of internal corporate processes, leads the authors to the conclusion that soft location factors are more important in attracting sustainably operating, sustainable corporations than hard location factors. Consequent recommendations regarding regional policies include: understanding the organization’s history and carefully choosing who to approach; betting on long-term relationships and staying attractive with always-new offers; increasing sunk costs by supporting investments, trust and image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguzzoli R, Hunek I (2019) How regional are regional headquarters? The “latinization” of control in European structures of a Brazilian MNC. In: Breinbauer A, Brennan L, Jäger J, Nachbagauer AGM, Nölke A (eds) Emerging market multinationals and Europe: challenges and strategies. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Altvater E, Mahnkopf B (1996) Grenzen der Globalisierung: Ökonomie, Ökologie und Politik in der Weltgesellschaft. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Altvater E, Mahnkopf B (2002) Globalisierung der Unsicherheit: Arbeit im Schatten, schmutziges Geld und informelle Politik. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambos B, Schlegelmilch BB (2010) The new role of regional management. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antalovsky E, Bartik H, Lutter J (2015) Wiens “Osteuropa-Kompetenz” als Standort-USP. Report Wien: Europaforum Wien im Auftrag der Wirtschaftsagentur Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkemeyer R, Figge F (2014) CSR in multiple environments: the impact of headquartering. Crit Perspect Int Bus 10:124–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-05-2013-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benham M, MacLean TL (2011) Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. Bus Ethics Q 21:45–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentele G, Nothhaft H (2011) Vertrauen und Glaubwürdigkeit als Grundlage von Corporate Social Responsibility: Die (massen-)mediale Konstruktion von Verantwortung und Verantwortlichkeit. In: Raupp J, Jarolimek S, Schultz F (eds) Handbuch CSR: kommunikationswissenschaftliche Grundlagen, disziplinäre Zugänge und methodische Herausforderungen. VS, Wiesbaden, pp 45–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie NE (2012) Corporate social responsibility in business. Background paper. Center for Integrative Leadership, University of Minnesota, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese A, Costa R, Rosati F (2015) A feedback-based model for CSR assessment and materiality analysis. Account Forum 39:312–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2015.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrol AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility. Bus Horiz 34:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane A, Matten D (2016) Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui L, Fan D, Liu X, Li Y (2017) Where to seek strategic assets for competitive catch-up? A configurational study of emerging multinational enterprises expanding into foreign strategic factor markets. Organ Stud 38:1059–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616670441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Beelde I, Tuybens S (2015) Enhancing the credibility of reporting on corporate social responsibility in Europe. Bus Strateg Environ 24:190–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1999) When ethics travel: the promise and peril of global business ethics. Calif Manag Rev 41(4):45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH, Fortanier F (2007) Multinational enterprises and the new development paradigm: consequences for host country development. Working Paper 011-07/08. Georgia Tech Center for International Business Education and Research, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehnert I, Parsa S, Roper I, Wagner M, Muller-Camen M (2016) Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:88–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einwiller S, Ruppel C, Schnauber A (2016) Harmonization and differences in CSR reporting of US and German companies. Corp Commun 21:230–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2014-0062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1999) Triple bottom-line reporting: looking for balance. Aust CPA 69:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (2004) Enter the triple bottom line. http://www.johnelkington.com/TBL-elkington-chapter.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2011

  • Enderle G (1995) What is international? A typology of international spheres and its relevance for business ethics. Paper presented at the IABS, 26–30 June 1995, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelfried J (2004) Nachhaltiges Umweltmanagement. Oldenbourg, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen L (2013) The embeddedness of responsible business practice: exploring the interaction between national-institutional environments and corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 115:213–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1395-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz P, Kleinfeld A, Thorns M, Vitt J (2011) Die DIN ISO 26000 “Leitfaden zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Organisationen”, Stand: 1. November 2011. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, Referat Information, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, de Colle S (2013) Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman AL, Miles S (2006) Stakeholders: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath J (2006) Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations. Corp Gov 6:175–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700610655178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Reporting Initiative (2013) Sustainability reporting guidelines – G4. www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principlesand-Standard-Disclosures.pd. Accessed 12 June 2013

  • Global Reporting Initiative (2015) Leitfaden zur Nachhaltigkeit. www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/German-G3-Reporting-Guidelines.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2015

  • Göbel E (2013) Unternehmensethik: Grundlagen und praktische Umsetzung. UVK, Konstanz

    Google Scholar 

  • Godiwalla YH, Damanpour F (2006) The MNCS global ethics and social responsibility: a strategic diversity management imperative. J Divers Manag 1:43. https://doi.org/10.19030/jdm.v1i2.5034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeming A (2007) Öl ins Wasser. Eine Chronologie der schwersten Umweltunfälle. http://www.fluter.de/de/wasser/thema/6064/. Accessed 5 Mar 2015

  • Hall ET (1959) The silent language. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann T, Huotari M (2015) Chinese FDI in Europe and Germany. Rhodium Group; Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen NK, Küpper W (2009) Power strategies and power sources of management: conference paper. 25th EGOS Colloquium, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauff V (ed) (1987) Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft: Der Brundtland-Bericht der Weltkommission für Umwelt und Entwicklung. Eggenkamp, Greven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauff MV, Kleine A (2009) Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Grundlagen und Umsetzung. De Gruyter, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hauska L (2019) Sustainable development goals as a guideline for multinational corporations. In: Breinbauer A, Brennan L, Jäger J, Nachbagauer AGM, Nölke A (eds) Emerging market multinationals and Europe: challenges and strategies. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger K, Battat J, Kusek P (2011) Attracting FDI – how much does investment climate matter? World Bank – View Point, Note No. 327

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes EC (1958) Men and their work. Free Press, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labor Organization (2001) Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems (ILO-OSH 2001). https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/ilo-bookstore/order-online/books/WCMS_PUBL_9221116344_EN/lang%2D%2Den/index.htm. Accessed 17 Oct 2018

  • ISO (2011) ISO 26000 – social responsibility. Discovering ISO 26000. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/iso26000.htm. Accessed 26 Mar 2011

  • ISO (2016) ISO 14000 family – environmental management. https://www.iso.org/iso-14001-environmental-management.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2016

  • Karmasin M (1996) Ethik als Gewinn: Zur ethischen Rekonstruktion der Ökonomie: Konzepte und Perspektiven von Wirtschaftsethik, Unternehmensethik, Führungsethik. Linde, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA (2005) What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 47:8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2000) No logo: taking aim at the brand bullies. Knopf Canada, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleine A (2009) Operationalisierung einer Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie: Ökologie, Ökonomie und Soziales integrieren. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lattemann C, Fetscherin M, Alon I, Li S, Schneider A-M (2009) CSR communication intensity in chinese and indian multinational companies. Corp Gov 17:426–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00758.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lautermann C (2005) Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von transnationalen Unternehmen: Theoretisches Konzept und praktische Relevanz. Schriftenreihe Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Unternehmensführung, Betriebliche Umweltpolitik, vol 42. Carl-von-Ossietzky-Univ. Fak II Informatik Wirtschafts- und Rechtswiss, Oldenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipziger D (2001) SA8000 00: The definitive guide to the new social standard. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Fetscherin M, Alon I, Lattemann C, Yeh K (2010) Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets. Manag Int Rev 50:635–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0049-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahnke V, Ambos B, Nell PC, Hobdari B (2012) How do regional headquarters influence corporate decisions in networked MNCs? J Int Manag 18:293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall ME, Oddou G (1986) Acculturation profiles of expatriate managers: implications for cross-cultural training programs. Columbia J World Bus 21(4):73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirza H, Girould A, Wee HK (2011) Emerging multinational enterprises. In: Brennan L (ed) The emergence of southern multinationals: their impact on Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 13–41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Christ G (2012) Nachhaltiges Management aus der Entscheidungsperspektive: Restitutionskosten, Jetzt-für-dann-Entscheidungen und Trade-Offs. In: Corsten H, Roth H (eds) Nachhaltigkeit: Unternehmerisches Handeln in globaler Verantwortung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 51–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nachbagauer AGM (2016a) Regionale Headquarter als Förderer von Nachhaltigkeit in multinationalen Unternehmen? Wirtschaft Manag 23(Juni):7–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachbagauer AGM (2016b) Stimulating sustainability in multinational companies: the significance of regional headquarters. Manag Dyn Knowl Econ 4:215–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachbagauer AGM (2019) Structures and decisions in emerging market multinational corporations. In: Breinbauer A, Brennan L, Jäger J, Nachbagauer AGM, Nölke A (eds) Emerging market multinationals and Europe: challenges and strategies. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasser Appel T (2014) Just how capitalist is China? Braz J Polit Econ 34:656–669. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572014000400009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nölke A (2013) Spielarten des Kapitalismus. Peripherie 33:256–259

    Google Scholar 

  • ONR ISO 26000 (2011) Leitfaden zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung (ISO 26000:2010): guidance on social responsibility (ISO 26000:2010). ICS 03.100.01

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson J (2003) Models of the company and the employment relationship. Br J Ind Relat 41:481–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsa S, Roper I, Muller-Camen M, Szigetvari E (2018) Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework. Account Forum 42:47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche A (2009) “A necessary supplement”: what the United Nations global compact is and is not. Bus Soc 48:511–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309332378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer H, Hauser-Ditz A, Preller EC (2004) Transparenzstudie zur Beschreibung ausgewählter international verbreiteter Rating-Systeme zur Erfassung von Corporate Social Responsibility. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid T, Härtel A (2014) Rating von Nachhaltigkeitsfonds. In: Faust M, Scholz S (eds) Nachhaltige Geldanlagen: Produkte, Strategien und Beratungskonzepte. Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp 539–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh A (2016) Vienna’s role as metropolis in central and Eastern Europe: status and future perspectives: a project of the master class CEE 2015/16. Final report. Vienna University of Economics and Business. https://www.wien.gv.at/kontakte/md-eui/pdf/report-vienna-metropolis-2016.pdf

  • Schütz A (1972) Der Fremde. In: Brodersen A (ed) Gesammelte Aufsätze II. Studien zur soziologischen Theorie. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 53–69

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slager R, Gond J-P, Moon J (2012) Standardization as institutional work: the regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organ Stud 33:763–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Accountability International (2014) Social accountability 8000. International standard. http://sa-intl.org/_data/n_0001/resources/live/SA8000%20Standard%202014.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2014

  • Sotorrío LL, Sánchez JLF (2008) Corporate social responsibility of the most highly reputed European and north American firms. J Bus Ethics 82:379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9901-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence L, Bourlakis M (2009) The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose. Supp Chain Manag 14:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910970126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadt Wien (2014) STEP 2025. Urban Development Plan Vienna. www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/studien/pdf/b008379b.pd

  • Stiglitz JE (2002) Globalization and its discontents. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thommen J-P, Achleitner A-K (2012) Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre: Umfassende Einführung aus managementorientierter Sicht, 7., vollst. überarb. Aufl. 2012. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact (2011) UNGC. Allgemeines. http://www.unglobalcompact.at/ungc/site/de/unglobalcompact/allgemeine

  • UN Global Compact (2017) Making global goals local business. A new era for responsible business. http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/publications/MGGLB-2017-UNGA.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2018

  • UNCTAD (2015) World investment report 2015: Die Entwicklung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2015_en.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2018

  • Vigneau L, Humphreys M, Moon J (2015) How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. J Bus Ethics 131:469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt J, Franz P, Kleinfeld A, Thorns M (2011) Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung nach DIN ISO 26000. Eine Einführung mit Hinweisen für Anwender. Beuth, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley R (2007) Business systems and organizational capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Willis CAA (2003) The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. J Bus Ethics 43:233–237. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022958618391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadek S (2004) The path to corporate responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 82(125–32):150

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences BFI Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Andreas G. M. Nachbagauer & Barbara Waldhauser

Authors
  1. Andreas G. M. Nachbagauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Waldhauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas G. M. Nachbagauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences BFI Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Andreas Breinbauer , Johannes Jäger  & Andreas G. M. Nachbagauer ,  & 

  2. Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Louis Brennan

  3. Department Social Sciences, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

    Andreas Nölke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nachbagauer, A.G.M., Waldhauser, B. (2019). Defining Sustainability Criteria for Emerging Market Multinationals. In: Breinbauer, A., Brennan, L., Jäger, J., Nachbagauer, A.G.M., Nölke, A. (eds) Emerging Market Multinationals and Europe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31291-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation