Advertisement

Defining Sustainability Criteria for Emerging Market Multinationals

  • Andreas G. M. NachbagauerEmail author
  • Barbara Waldhauser
Chapter
  • 221 Downloads

Abstract

Literature and practice in interregional competition to attract new companies generally overlooks the question of whether these organizations operate sustainably and whether any efforts in attracting them are sustainable in terms of long-term existence. It is thus necessary to consider not only an organization’s long-term commitment towards a specific location but also general criteria for sustainable organizations, such as economical, ecological and social sustainability. Furthermore, (regional) headquarters have to be held responsible for their subsidiaries and partners along the value chain. While classic location incentives can attract new regional headquarters in the short term, we argue that classic sustainability criteria such as transparency and stakeholder-orientation suggest investments with long-term orientation. This, in connection with considerations of internal corporate processes, leads the authors to the conclusion that soft location factors are more important in attracting sustainably operating, sustainable corporations than hard location factors. Consequent recommendations regarding regional policies include: understanding the organization’s history and carefully choosing who to approach; betting on long-term relationships and staying attractive with always-new offers; increasing sunk costs by supporting investments, trust and image.

References

  1. Aguzzoli R, Hunek I (2019) How regional are regional headquarters? The “latinization” of control in European structures of a Brazilian MNC. In: Breinbauer A, Brennan L, Jäger J, Nachbagauer AGM, Nölke A (eds) Emerging market multinationals and Europe: challenges and strategies. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  2. Altvater E, Mahnkopf B (1996) Grenzen der Globalisierung: Ökonomie, Ökologie und Politik in der Weltgesellschaft. Westfälisches Dampfboot, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  3. Altvater E, Mahnkopf B (2002) Globalisierung der Unsicherheit: Arbeit im Schatten, schmutziges Geld und informelle Politik. Westfälisches Dampfboot, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  4. Ambos B, Schlegelmilch BB (2010) The new role of regional management. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antalovsky E, Bartik H, Lutter J (2015) Wiens “Osteuropa-Kompetenz” als Standort-USP. Report Wien: Europaforum Wien im Auftrag der Wirtschaftsagentur WienGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkemeyer R, Figge F (2014) CSR in multiple environments: the impact of headquartering. Crit Perspect Int Bus 10:124–151.  https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-05-2013-0013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benham M, MacLean TL (2011) Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. Bus Ethics Q 21:45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentele G, Nothhaft H (2011) Vertrauen und Glaubwürdigkeit als Grundlage von Corporate Social Responsibility: Die (massen-)mediale Konstruktion von Verantwortung und Verantwortlichkeit. In: Raupp J, Jarolimek S, Schultz F (eds) Handbuch CSR: kommunikationswissenschaftliche Grundlagen, disziplinäre Zugänge und methodische Herausforderungen. VS, Wiesbaden, pp 45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowie NE (2012) Corporate social responsibility in business. Background paper. Center for Integrative Leadership, University of Minnesota, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  10. Calabrese A, Costa R, Rosati F (2015) A feedback-based model for CSR assessment and materiality analysis. Account Forum 39:312–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrol AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility. Bus Horiz 34:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Crane A, Matten D (2016) Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Cui L, Fan D, Liu X, Li Y (2017) Where to seek strategic assets for competitive catch-up? A configurational study of emerging multinational enterprises expanding into foreign strategic factor markets. Organ Stud 38:1059–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616670441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Beelde I, Tuybens S (2015) Enhancing the credibility of reporting on corporate social responsibility in Europe. Bus Strateg Environ 24:190–216.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1814 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1999) When ethics travel: the promise and peril of global business ethics. Calif Manag Rev 41(4):45–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunning JH, Fortanier F (2007) Multinational enterprises and the new development paradigm: consequences for host country development. Working Paper 011-07/08. Georgia Tech Center for International Business Education and Research, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehnert I, Parsa S, Roper I, Wagner M, Muller-Camen M (2016) Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:88–108.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Einwiller S, Ruppel C, Schnauber A (2016) Harmonization and differences in CSR reporting of US and German companies. Corp Commun 21:230–245.  https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2014-0062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elkington J (1999) Triple bottom-line reporting: looking for balance. Aust CPA 69:18–21Google Scholar
  21. Elkington J (2004) Enter the triple bottom line. http://www.johnelkington.com/TBL-elkington-chapter.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2011
  22. Enderle G (1995) What is international? A typology of international spheres and its relevance for business ethics. Paper presented at the IABS, 26–30 June 1995, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  23. Engelfried J (2004) Nachhaltiges Umweltmanagement. Oldenbourg, MünchenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fransen L (2013) The embeddedness of responsible business practice: exploring the interaction between national-institutional environments and corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 115:213–227.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1395-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Franz P, Kleinfeld A, Thorns M, Vitt J (2011) Die DIN ISO 26000 “Leitfaden zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Organisationen”, Stand: 1. November 2011. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, Referat Information, BonnGoogle Scholar
  26. Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, de Colle S (2013) Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times MagazineGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedman AL, Miles S (2006) Stakeholders: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Galbreath J (2006) Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations. Corp Gov 6:175–187.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700610655178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Global Reporting Initiative (2013) Sustainability reporting guidelines – G4. www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principlesand-Standard-Disclosures.pd. Accessed 12 June 2013
  31. Global Reporting Initiative (2015) Leitfaden zur Nachhaltigkeit. www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/German-G3-Reporting-Guidelines.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2015
  32. Göbel E (2013) Unternehmensethik: Grundlagen und praktische Umsetzung. UVK, KonstanzGoogle Scholar
  33. Godiwalla YH, Damanpour F (2006) The MNCS global ethics and social responsibility: a strategic diversity management imperative. J Divers Manag 1:43.  https://doi.org/10.19030/jdm.v1i2.5034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haeming A (2007) Öl ins Wasser. Eine Chronologie der schwersten Umweltunfälle. http://www.fluter.de/de/wasser/thema/6064/. Accessed 5 Mar 2015
  35. Hall ET (1959) The silent language. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanemann T, Huotari M (2015) Chinese FDI in Europe and Germany. Rhodium Group; Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Hansen NK, Küpper W (2009) Power strategies and power sources of management: conference paper. 25th EGOS Colloquium, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  38. Hauff V (ed) (1987) Unsere gemeinsame Zukunft: Der Brundtland-Bericht der Weltkommission für Umwelt und Entwicklung. Eggenkamp, GrevenGoogle Scholar
  39. Hauff MV, Kleine A (2009) Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Grundlagen und Umsetzung. De Gruyter, MünchenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hauska L (2019) Sustainable development goals as a guideline for multinational corporations. In: Breinbauer A, Brennan L, Jäger J, Nachbagauer AGM, Nölke A (eds) Emerging market multinationals and Europe: challenges and strategies. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  41. Hornberger K, Battat J, Kusek P (2011) Attracting FDI – how much does investment climate matter? World Bank – View Point, Note No. 327Google Scholar
  42. Hughes EC (1958) Men and their work. Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
  43. International Labor Organization (2001) Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems (ILO-OSH 2001). https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/ilo-bookstore/order-online/books/WCMS_PUBL_9221116344_EN/lang%2D%2Den/index.htm. Accessed 17 Oct 2018
  44. ISO (2011) ISO 26000 – social responsibility. Discovering ISO 26000. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/iso26000.htm. Accessed 26 Mar 2011
  45. ISO (2016) ISO 14000 family – environmental management. https://www.iso.org/iso-14001-environmental-management.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
  46. Karmasin M (1996) Ethik als Gewinn: Zur ethischen Rekonstruktion der Ökonomie: Konzepte und Perspektiven von Wirtschaftsethik, Unternehmensethik, Führungsethik. Linde, WienGoogle Scholar
  47. Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA (2005) What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 47:8–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Klein N (2000) No logo: taking aim at the brand bullies. Knopf Canada, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  49. Kleine A (2009) Operationalisierung einer Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie: Ökologie, Ökonomie und Soziales integrieren. Gabler, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lattemann C, Fetscherin M, Alon I, Li S, Schneider A-M (2009) CSR communication intensity in chinese and indian multinational companies. Corp Gov 17:426–442.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00758.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lautermann C (2005) Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von transnationalen Unternehmen: Theoretisches Konzept und praktische Relevanz. Schriftenreihe Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Unternehmensführung, Betriebliche Umweltpolitik, vol 42. Carl-von-Ossietzky-Univ. Fak II Informatik Wirtschafts- und Rechtswiss, OldenburgGoogle Scholar
  52. Leipziger D (2001) SA8000 00: The definitive guide to the new social standard. Prentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Li S, Fetscherin M, Alon I, Lattemann C, Yeh K (2010) Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets. Manag Int Rev 50:635–654.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0049-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mahnke V, Ambos B, Nell PC, Hobdari B (2012) How do regional headquarters influence corporate decisions in networked MNCs? J Int Manag 18:293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mendenhall ME, Oddou G (1986) Acculturation profiles of expatriate managers: implications for cross-cultural training programs. Columbia J World Bus 21(4):73–79Google Scholar
  56. Mirza H, Girould A, Wee HK (2011) Emerging multinational enterprises. In: Brennan L (ed) The emergence of southern multinationals: their impact on Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 13–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Müller-Christ G (2012) Nachhaltiges Management aus der Entscheidungsperspektive: Restitutionskosten, Jetzt-für-dann-Entscheidungen und Trade-Offs. In: Corsten H, Roth H (eds) Nachhaltigkeit : Unternehmerisches Handeln in globaler Verantwortung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 51–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nachbagauer AGM (2016a) Regionale Headquarter als Förderer von Nachhaltigkeit in multinationalen Unternehmen? Wirtschaft Manag 23(Juni):7–44Google Scholar
  59. Nachbagauer AGM (2016b) Stimulating sustainability in multinational companies: the significance of regional headquarters. Manag Dyn Knowl Econ 4:215–240Google Scholar
  60. Nachbagauer AGM (2019) Structures and decisions in emerging market multinational corporations. In: Breinbauer A, Brennan L, Jäger J, Nachbagauer AGM, Nölke A (eds) Emerging market multinationals and Europe: challenges and strategies. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  61. Nasser Appel T (2014) Just how capitalist is China? Braz J Polit Econ 34:656–669.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572014000400009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nölke A (2013) Spielarten des Kapitalismus. Peripherie 33:256–259Google Scholar
  63. ONR ISO 26000 (2011) Leitfaden zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung (ISO 26000:2010): guidance on social responsibility (ISO 26000:2010). ICS 03.100.01Google Scholar
  64. Parkinson J (2003) Models of the company and the employment relationship. Br J Ind Relat 41:481–509.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parsa S, Roper I, Muller-Camen M, Szigetvari E (2018) Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework. Account Forum 42:47–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rasche A (2009) “A necessary supplement”: what the United Nations global compact is and is not. Bus Soc 48:511–537.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309332378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schäfer H, Hauser-Ditz A, Preller EC (2004) Transparenzstudie zur Beschreibung ausgewählter international verbreiteter Rating-Systeme zur Erfassung von Corporate Social Responsibility. Bertelsmann Stiftung, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  68. Schmid T, Härtel A (2014) Rating von Nachhaltigkeitsfonds. In: Faust M, Scholz S (eds) Nachhaltige Geldanlagen: Produkte, Strategien und Beratungskonzepte. Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp 539–556Google Scholar
  69. Schuh A (2016) Vienna’s role as metropolis in central and Eastern Europe: status and future perspectives: a project of the master class CEE 2015/16. Final report. Vienna University of Economics and Business. https://www.wien.gv.at/kontakte/md-eui/pdf/report-vienna-metropolis-2016.pdf
  70. Schütz A (1972) Der Fremde. In: Brodersen A (ed) Gesammelte Aufsätze II. Studien zur soziologischen Theorie. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Slager R, Gond J-P, Moon J (2012) Standardization as institutional work: the regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organ Stud 33:763–790.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Social Accountability International (2014) Social accountability 8000. International standard. http://sa-intl.org/_data/n_0001/resources/live/SA8000%20Standard%202014.pdf. Accessed 6 Dec 2014
  73. Sotorrío LL, Sánchez JLF (2008) Corporate social responsibility of the most highly reputed European and north American firms. J Bus Ethics 82:379–390.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9901-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spence L, Bourlakis M (2009) The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose. Supp Chain Manag 14:291–302.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910970126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stadt Wien (2014) STEP 2025. Urban Development Plan Vienna. www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/studien/pdf/b008379b.pd
  76. Stiglitz JE (2002) Globalization and its discontents. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Thommen J-P, Achleitner A-K (2012) Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre: Umfassende Einführung aus managementorientierter Sicht, 7., vollst. überarb. Aufl. 2012. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  78. UN Global Compact (2017) Making global goals local business. A new era for responsible business. http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/publications/MGGLB-2017-UNGA.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2018
  79. UNCTAD (2015) World investment report 2015: Die Entwicklung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen. https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2015_en.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2018
  80. Vigneau L, Humphreys M, Moon J (2015) How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. J Bus Ethics 131:469–486.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vitt J, Franz P, Kleinfeld A, Thorns M (2011) Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung nach DIN ISO 26000. Eine Einführung mit Hinweisen für Anwender. Beuth, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  82. Whitley R (2007) Business systems and organizational capabilities. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Willis CAA (2003) The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. J Bus Ethics 43:233–237.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022958618391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zadek S (2004) The path to corporate responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 82(125–32):150Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas G. M. Nachbagauer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barbara Waldhauser
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences BFI ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations