Advertisement

Globalisation After the Financial Crisis: Structural Change and Emerging Market Multinationals

  • Jonathan PerratonEmail author
Chapter
  • 246 Downloads

Abstract

During the “Great Moderation” period before the global financial crisis, globalisation was widely regarded in policy and academic circles as an inexorable process and as a broadly benign one. If appropriate policies were pursued, globalisation held out the prospect of higher growth and global convergence. Change within economies could be managed with appropriate supply side policies; resistance to changes from globalisation would only lead to welfare losses. The drivers of globalisation processes were not always clear in these accounts; technological changes enabled greater international flows, but policy changes also underpinned the growth of global markets.

This chapter examines the shifts in the global economy, particularly in relation to emerging economies. It examines the most recent phase of globalisation in context and how it has led to huge shifts in global economic activity with profound effects on the fortunes of different groups, and whether the financial crisis has led to a crisis of globalisation and a reversal of earlier integration. It highlights the role of emerging economy multinationals in the context of the shift of global economic activity and the implications of this for the future prospects for globalisation. These firms have become increasingly important in the growth of emerging economies. Emerging market multinationals have grown to play a key role in the global economy, and pose competitive challenges for established producers. They appear to pose particular challenges for major European firms.

References

  1. Autor DH, Dorn D, Hanson GH (2013) The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. Am Econ Rev 103:2121–2168.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin RE (2016) The great convergence: information technology and the new globalization. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. BIS (2017) Annual report. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/about/areport/areport2018.htm
  4. Boston Consulting Group (2011) Companies on the move: rising stars from developing economies are reshaping global industries. Boston Consulting Group, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown CP (2018) Trade policy toward supply chains after the great recession. IMF Econ Rev 66:602–616.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-018-0061-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coe NM, Yeung HW-c (2015) Global production networks. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Constantinescu C, Mattoo A, Ruta M (2015) The global trade slowdown: cyclical or structural? Policy research working paper, vol 7158. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dao MC, Das M, Koczan Z (2017) Why is labor receiving a smaller share of global income? Theory and empirical evidence. IMF Working Papers. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. ECB (2016) Understanding the weakness in global trade: What is the new normal? European Central Bank. Occasional Paper Series, vol 178, Frankfurt/MainGoogle Scholar
  10. Federico S (2016) How does multinational production affect the measurement of competitiveness? Questioni di economia e finanza: occasional papers/Banca d’Italia Eurosistema, vol 301. Banca D’Italia, Eurosistema, RomaGoogle Scholar
  11. Federico S, Tena-Junguito A (2016) World trade, 1800-2015. https://voxeu.org/article/world-trade-1800-2015
  12. Hellebrandt T, Mauro P (2015) The future of worldwide income distribution. SSRN J. doi:  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2593894
  13. ILO (2015) Global wage report 2014/15: wages and income inequality. Report of the subcommittee of the selection committee appointed to examine the application of the Cook Islands for membership of the International Labour Organization. International Labor Organization (ILO), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. IMF (2016) World economic outlook: subdued demand – symptoms and remedies. International Monetary Fund IMF, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Karabarbounis L, Neiman B (2014) The global decline of the labor share. Q J Econ 129:61–103.  https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozul-Wright R, Rayment P (2004) Globalization reloaded: an UNCTAD perspective. UNCTAD Discussion Paper No. 167Google Scholar
  17. Lang V, Tavares MM (2018) The distribution of gains from globalization. IMF Working Papers 18:1. doi:  https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484347065.001
  18. Livesey F (2017) From global to local: the making of things and the end of globalisation. Profile Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Marin D, Schymik J, Tscheke J (2015) The globalization of angel investments. Bruegel Working Paper 2015/09, 1 September 2015. Bruegel Working Paper 2015/09Google Scholar
  20. Mayer M, Hautz J, Stadler C, Whittington R (2017) Diversification and internationalization in the European single market: the British exception. Bus Hist Rev 91:279–299.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S000768051700071X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKinsey Global Institute (2012) The world at work: jobs, pay and skills for 3.5 billion people. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/the-world-at-work
  22. McKinsey Global Institute (2015) Playing to win: the new global competition for corporate profits. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-new-global-competition-for-corporate-profits
  23. McKinsey Global Institute (2016) Poorer than their parents? Flat or falling incomes in advanced economies. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/poorer-than-their-parents-a-new-perspective-on-income-inequality
  24. McKinsey Global Institute (2018a) Outperformers: high-growth emerging economies and the companies that propel them. www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/innovation-and-growth/outperformers-high-growth-emerging-economies-and-the-companies-that-propel-them
  25. Milanovic B (2016) Global inequality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Milberg W, Winkler D (2010) Trade, crisis, and recovery: restructuring global value Chain. In: Cattaneo O, Gereffi G, Staritz C (eds) Global value chains in a postcrisis world. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 21–70Google Scholar
  27. Milberg W, Winkler D (2013) Outsourcing economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD (2017) Employment outlook: 2017. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perraton J (2019) The scope and implications of globalisation. In: Michie J (ed) The handbook of globalisation, 3rd edn. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodrik D (2016) Premature deindustrialization. J Econ Growth 21:1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Subramanian A, Kessler M (2013) The hyperglobalization of trade and its future. SSRN J.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2297994
  32. Timmer MP, Los B, Stehrer R, de VGJ (2013) Fragmentation, incomes and jobs: an analysis of European competitiveness. Econ Policy 28:613–661.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. UNCTAD (2016) Trade and development report 2016: structural transformation for inclusive and sustained growth. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. UNCTAD (2017) World investment report 2017. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. UNCTAD (2018) Trade and development report 2018: power, platforms and the free trade delusion. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Williamson PJ, Ramamurti R, Fleury A, Fleury MTL (2013) The competitive advantage of emerging market multinationals. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. World Bank (2017) Global value chain development report 2017: measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. WTO (2013) World trade report 2013: factors shaping the future of world trade. World Trade Organization (WTO), GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations