Skip to main content

Introduction: Scaling a Social Enterprise by Exchanging Impact for Resources

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 489 Accesses

Abstract

This book introduces a market approach that social enterprises can use to scale their impact. We show examples of how social entrepreneurs have successfully scaled the impact of their organizations by exchanging impact for resources. In this approach, social entrepreneurs connect buyers (such as impact investors) and sellers (such as social enterprises) in order to negotiate positive social and environmental impacts in exchange for resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jäger, U., & Schröer, A. (2014). Integrated organizational identity: A definition of hybrid organizations and a research agenda. Voluntas, 25, 1281–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Young, D. (1983). If not for profit, for what? A behavioral theory of the nonprofit sector based on entrepreneurship. Fallbrook, CA: Aero Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dees, G., Anderson, B., & Wei-skillern, J. (2004). Scaling social impact: Strategies for spreading social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area*. Voluntas, 6(2), 159–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Segerberg, A., & Bennett, L. W. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14, 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Höchstädter, A. K., & Scheck, B. (2019). What’s in a name: An analysis of impact investing understandings by academics and practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 449–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Webb, J. W., Kistruck, G. M., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen, D. J. (2011). The entrepreneurship process in base of the pyramid markets: The case of multinational enterprise/nongovernment organization alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 555–581.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jäger, U., & Sathe, V. (2015). The importance of vision and purpose of BoP business development. In S. Hart et al. (Eds.), Base of the pyramid 3.0: Sustainable development through innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 12–30). Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prahalad, C. K. (2007). The BOP debate: Aneel Karnani responds. http://nbis.org/nbisresources/sustainable_development_equity/bottom_of_pyramid_debate_with_prahalad.pdf.NextBillion.net.

  12. Bucher, S., Jäger, U., & Prado, A. M. (2015). Sistema Ser: Scaling private health care for the base of the pyramid. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 736–750.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Godfrey, P. (Ed.). Management research in informal markets. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anheier, H. (2014). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2019). Innovation and scaling for impact: How effective social enterprises do it (256 pp). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philantrophy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urs Jäger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jäger, U., Symmes, F., Cardoza, G. (2020). Introduction: Scaling a Social Enterprise by Exchanging Impact for Resources. In: Scaling Strategies for Social Entrepreneurs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31160-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics