Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Unexpected Benefits of Paying for Information: The Effects of Payment on Information Source Choices and Epistemic Thinking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 365))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

People often need to select, evaluate, and integrate information from diverse online sources to support decision-making processes in everyday life. Information is a product which is often available for free, but which people are willing to pay for. Free access to information can presumably facilitate greater use of information sources, thereby leading to improved learning and knowledge. But does it? Is “more of a good thing” actually better? This study examined how paying for information affects information source choices and information consumers’ epistemic perspectives regarding the status and justification of knowledge. 106 university students participated in an experiment presenting an online information store in which participants acquired information products in order to reach a decision concerning a controversial health topic. Participants were assigned to two pricing conditions; one with paid information based on an incentive-compatible bidding mechanism (payment condition) and the other with information offered at a zero price (free condition). Results indicated that in the payment condition, participants accessed fewer information sources but that these sources were more diverse and balanced in their positions. Differences in epistemic perspectives emerged between the two conditions, suggesting payment requirements affected epistemic perspectives. Specifically, in the payment condition, evaluativism was higher and absolutism was lower than in the free condition. This is the first study to indicate a potential relation between the consumption characteristics of information products and the epistemic thinking of information users. The study has theoretical and practical implications, connecting the fields of information economics and personal epistemology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barzilai, S., Eshet-Alkalai, Y.: The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learn. Instr. 36, 86–103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barzilai, S., Ka’adan, I.: Learning to integrate divergent information sources: the interplay of epistemic cognition and epistemic metacognition. Metacognition and Learning 12, 193–232 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9165-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barzilai, S., Strømsø, H.I.: Individual differences in multiple document comprehension. In: Braasch, J. (ed.) Handbook of Multiple Source Use, pp. 99–116 (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Barzilai, S., Tzadok, E., Eshet-Alaklai, Y.: When Experts Disagree: Sourcing Practices While Reading Conflicting Online Information Sources, pp. 721–728. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barzilai, S., Weinstock, M.: Measuring epistemic thinking within and across topics: a scenario-based approach. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 42, 141–158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barzilai, S., Zohar, A.: Epistemic thinking in action: evaluating and integrating online sources. Cogn. Instr. 30, 39–85 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.636495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bates, B.J.: Information as an economic good: a re-evaluation of theoretical approaches. In: Ruben, B.D., Lievrouw, L.A. (eds.) Mediation, Information, and Communication, pp. 379–394. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chinn, C.A., Rinehart, R.W.: Epistemic cognition and philosophy: developing a new framework for epistemic cognition. In: Greene, J.A., Sandoval, W.A., Bråten, I. (eds.) Handbook of Epistemic Cognition, pp. 460–478. Routledge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eppler, M.J., Mengis, J.: The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inf. Soc. 20, 325–344 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferguson, L.E., Bråten, I.: Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learn. Instr. 25, 49–61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson, L.E., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., Anmarkrud, Ø.: Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in the context of reading multiple documents: examining the role of conflict. Int. J. Educ. Res. 62, 100–114 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldfarb, A., Tucker, C.: Digital economics. J. Econ. Lit. 57, 3–43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greene, J.A., Sandoval, W.A., Bråten, I.: Handbook of Epistemic Cognition. Routledge, New York (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartwell, M., Kaplan, A.: Students’ personal connection with science: investigating the multidimensional phenomenological structure of self-relevance. J. Exp. Educ. 86, 86–104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1381581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hilbert, M.: How to measure “How Much Information”? Theoretical, methodological, and statistical challenges for the social sciences introduction. Int. J. Commun. 6, 1042–1055 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hofer, B.K., Pintrich, P.R.: The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 67, 88–140 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iordanou, K.: Developing epistemological understanding in scientific and social domains through argumentation. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 30, 109–119 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R.H.: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 5, 193–206 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kienhues, D., Bromme, R., Stahl, E.: Changing epistemological beliefs: the unexpected impact of a short-term intervention. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 78, 545–565 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X268589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kienhues, D., Stadtler, M., Bromme, R.: Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the web: when expert information breeds laypersons’ doubts about experts. Learn. Instr. 21, 193–204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuhn, D.: The Skills of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M.: What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In: Hofer, B.K., Pintrich, P.R. (eds.) Personal Epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, pp. 121–144. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin, T.-C., Hsu, J.S.-C., Chen, H.-C.: Customer willingness to pay for online music: the role of free mentality. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 14, 19 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moody, D., Walsh, P.: Measuring the value of information: an asset valuation approach. In: ECIS, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nickerson, R.S.: Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2, 175–220 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Porsch, T., Bromme, R.: Effects of epistemological sensitization on source choices. Instr. Sci. 39, 805–819 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9155-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Raban, D.R., Geifman, D.: A theory based information pricing system. In: MCIS 2011 Proceedings (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raban, D.R.: User-centered evaluation of information: a research challenge. Internet Res. 17, 306–322 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240710758948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raban, D.R., Koren, L.: Risk as a predictor of online competitive information acquisition. Open Inf. Sci. 3, 47–60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2019-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Raban, D.R., Mazor, M.: The willingness to pay for information in digital marketplaces. In: Kobyliński, A., Sobczak, A. (eds.) BIR 2013. LNBIP, vol. 158, pp. 267–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40823-6_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Raban, D.R., Rafaeli, S.: The effect of source nature and status on the subjective value of information. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 57, 321–329 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Raban, D.R., Rusho, Y.: Value perception of information sources in the context of learning. Open Inf. Sci. 2, 83–101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rafaeli, S., Raban, D.R.: Experimental investigation of the subjective value of information in trading. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4, 119–139 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schwartz, B.: The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. Harper Perennial, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., Ariely, D.: Zero as a special price: the true value of free products. Market. Sci. 26, 742–757 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shapiro, C., Varian, H.R.: Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Anderson, S.P., de Palma, A.: Information congestion. RAND J. Econ. 40, 688 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Weinstock, M., Zviling-Beiser, H.: Separating academic and social experience as potential factors in epistemological development. Learn. Instr. 19, 287–298 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zavala, J., Kuhn, D.: Solitary discourse is a productive activity. Psychol. Sci. 28, 578–586 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616689248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Administration, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Daphne R. Raban & Lina Portnoy

  2. Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Sarit Barzilai

Authors
  1. Daphne R. Raban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarit Barzilai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lina Portnoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daphne R. Raban .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice, Poland

    Małgorzata Pańkowska

  2. University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany

    Kurt Sandkuhl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Raban, D.R., Barzilai, S., Portnoy, L. (2019). The Unexpected Benefits of Paying for Information: The Effects of Payment on Information Source Choices and Epistemic Thinking. In: Pańkowska, M., Sandkuhl, K. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 365. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31143-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31142-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31143-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation