Skip to main content

How a Computer Should Think

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Essays on Belnap-­Dunn Logic

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 418))

Abstract

I propose that a certain four-valued logic should sometimes be used. It is to be understood that I use “logic” in a narrow sense, the old sense: a logic as an organon, a tool, a canon of inference. And it is also to be understood that I use “should” in a straightforward normative sense.

This paper and [5] are complements. There the introductory paragraphs and Part I are heavily abbreviated, while the more technical Parts 2 and 3 are given in full instead of, as here, barely summarized. Thanks are due to the National Science Foundation for partial support through Grant SOC71 03594 A02.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D. Jr. (1962). ‘Tautological Entailments’, Philosophical Studies, 13(1), 9–24. (See also Ch. III of Anderson and Belnap (1975).)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D. Jr. (1965). ‘First-Degree Entailments’, Mathematische Annalen, 149(4), 302–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D. Jr. (1975). Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belnap, N. D. Jr. (1963). An Analysis of Questions: Preliminary Report. Santa Monica: System Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belnap, N. D. Jr. (1976). ‘A Useful Four-Valued Logic’. Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic – Proceedings of the 1975 International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, G. Epstein and J. M. Dunn (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Belnap, N. D. Jr. and Steel, T. B. Jr. (1976). Erotetic Logic: An Introduction to the Logic of Questions and Answers. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, J. M. (1966). The Algebra of Intensional Logics, dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dunn, J. M. (1976). ‘Intuitive Semantics for First-Degree Entailments and “Coupled Trees”’, Philosophical Studies, 29(3), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn, J. M. and Belnap, N. D. Jr. (1968). ‘The Substitution Interpretation of the Quantifiers’, Noûs, 2(2), 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isner, D. W. (1975). ‘An Inferential Processor for Interacting with Biomedical Data Using Restricted Natural Language’, Proceedings of Spring Joint Computer Conference, 1107–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Isner, D. W. (1975). ‘Understanding “Understanding” Through Representation and Reasoning’, dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kripke, S. (1963). ‘Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I’, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 9(5–6), 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Routley, R. and Routley, V. (1972). ‘Semantics of First-Degree Entailment’, Noûs, 6(4), 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scott, D. (1970). ‘Outline of a Mathematical Theory of Computation’, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Princeton Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scott, D. (1972). ‘Continuous Lattices: Toposes, Algebraic Geometry and Logic’, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 274, 97–136.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scott, D. (1973). ‘Models for Various Type-Free Calculi’, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science IV. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science, Bucharest, 1971. Suppes, Henkin, Juja, Moisil (eds.), Elsevier: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro, S. and Wand, M. (1976). ‘The Relevance of Relevance’, Technical Report, Indiana University, Computer Science Department.

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Fraassen, B. (1969a). ‘Presuppositions, Supervaluations, and Free Logic’, The Logical Way of Doing Things, K.Lambert (ed.), New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Fraassen, B. (1969b). ‘Facts and Tautological Entailments’, The Journal of Philosophy, 66(15), 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuel D. Belnap .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Belnap, N.D. (2019). How a Computer Should Think. In: Omori, H., Wansing, H. (eds) New Essays on Belnap-­Dunn Logic. Synthese Library, vol 418. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31136-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics