Skip to main content

Coupling of Metallic and Mott-Insulating States in PdCrO2

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Angle Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy of Delafossite Metals

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 577 Accesses

Abstract

As described in Chap. 4, the non-magnetic delafossites PtCoO2 and PdCoO2 host bulk metallic states in their Pt and Pd layers, while the contribution of the CoO2 layer to the bands at the Fermi level is negligible. In this chapter I will concentrate on PdCrO2, the magnetic counterpart of PdCoO2. Its transition metal oxide layer is a correlated Mott insulator, hosting localised spins 3/2 on chromium sites, which at \(37.5 \,\mathrm {K}\) undergo a transition towards an antiferromagnetic state with a \(120^{\circ }\) order, as described in Sect. 1.1.4. The main question I will address in this chapter is how the coupling between the itinerant and antiferromagnetic Mott insulating subsystems affects the spectroscopic signatures, and what information can be obtained from the spectral function of such a coupled system. I will first show the measured spectra, and compare them to the bulk states of PtCoO2 and PdCoO2 (Sect. 5.1). In trying to understand the magnitude of the observed signal it became clear that our experimental observations cannot be explained in terms of simple models of electrons in a periodic potential. Reaching this conclusion required a general analysis of photoemission intensity in systems with periodic potentials of varying strength, given in Sect. 5.2. This discussion is not relevant only for PdCrO2, but for all systems with periodic potentials of varying strength, such as charge- or spin- density wave materials. A reader primarily interested in PdCrO2 may choose to read Sect. 5.2.4, in which the discrepancy between the measurement and the simple model becomes apparent, immediately after Sect. 5.1. The discrepancy motivated a many body calculation, done by our collaborators Sota Kitamura and Takashi Oka, which I outline in Sect. 5.3. This calculation in turn motivated additional experiments, described in Sect. 5.3.2, which both confirmed the theory and offered novel insight about the types of information accessible to angle resolved photoemission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is in fact a simplification, as the final state in the three step process is actually an unoccupied Bloch state. For high photon energies it can be approximated by a free-electron state, but even in these circumstances this is not the measured state, as the electron still needs to travel to the surface, and escape into vacuum (steps two and three of the three step process). These distinctions are however not important for the qualitative discussion outlined here.

  2. 2.

    Calling this quantity the ‘simulated intensity’, as I did in the simple models above, is misleading if we wish to compare it to the experimental findings, as it does not account for the experimental geometry, or the symmetry of the underlying orbitals.

  3. 3.

    The inter-layer coupling g here exhibits a weak momentum dependence, and is thus labelled as \(g_{\vec {k}}\). This is a consequence of the fact that in the real material each atom has more than one nearest neighbour in the neighbouring layer. The coupling therefore has a spatial structure, reflected in a momentum structure of its Fourier transform. For more details see Ref. [9].

References

  1. Noh H-J, Jeong J, Chang B, Jeong D, Moon HS, Cho E-J, Ok JM, Kim JS, Kim K, Min BI, Lee H-K, Kim J-Y, Park B-G, Kim H-D, Lee S (2014) Direct observation of localized spin antiferromagnetic transition in PdCrO\(_{\rm 2}\) by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Sci Rep 4:3680

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sobota JA, Kim K, Takatsu H, Hashimoto M, Mo S-K, Hussain Z, Oguchi T, Shishidou T, Maeno Y, Min BI, Shen Z-X (2013) Electronic structure of the metallic antiferromagnet PdCrO\(_{\rm 2}\) measured by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 88(12):125109

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mackenzie AP (2017) The properties of ultrapure delafossite metals. Rep Prog Phys 80(3):032501

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ok JM, Jo YJ, Kim K, Shishidou T, Choi ES, Noh H-J, Oguchi T, Min BI, Kim JS (2013) Quantum oscillations of the metallic triangular-lattice antiferromagnet PdCrO\(_{2}\). Phys Rev Lett 111(17):176405

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hicks CW, Gibbs AS, Zhao L, Kushwaha P, Borrmann H, Mackenzie AP, Takatsu H, Yonezawa S, Maeno Y, Yelland EA (2015) Quantum oscillations and magnetic reconstruction in the delafossite PdCrO\(_{\rm 2}\). Phys Rev B 92(1):014425

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kittel C (2007) Introduction to solid state physics, 7th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Voit J, Perfetti L, Zwick F, Berger H, Margaritondo G, Grüner G, Höchst H, Grioni M (2000) Electronic structure of solids with competing periodic potentials. Science 290(5491):501–503

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shoenberg D (2009) Magnetic oscillations in metals, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sunko V, Mazzola F, Kitamura S, Khim S, Kushwaha P, Clark OJ, Watson M, Marković I, Biswas D, Pourovskii L, Kim TK, Lee T-L, Thakur PK, Rosner H, Georges A, Moessner R, Oka T, Mackenzie AP, King PDC (2018) Probing spin correlations using angle resolved photoemission in a coupled metallic/Mott insulator system. arXiv:1809.08972

  10. Sasioglu E, Galanakis I, Friedrich C, Blügel S (2013) Ab initio calculation of the effective on-site Coulomb interaction parameters for half-metallic magnets. Phys Rev B 88(13):134402

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lechermann F (2018) Hidden Mott insulator in metallic PdCrO\(_{\rm 2}\). Phys Rev Mater 2(8):085004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Si Q (2010) Quantum criticality and global phase diagram of magnetic heavy fermions. Phys Status Solidi (b) 247(3):476–484

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Löhneysen Hv, Rosch A, Vojta M, Wölfle P (2007) Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions. Rev Modern Phys 79(3):1015–1075

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Khomskii DI (2010) Basic aspects of the quantum theory of solids: order and elementary excitations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeh JJ, Lindau I (1985) Atomic subshell photoionization cross sections and asymmetry parameters: 1< Z< 103. AtIc Data Nucl Data Tables 32(1):1–155

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rotenberg E, Bostwick A (2015) Superlattice effects in graphene on SiC(0001) and Ir(111) probed by ARPES. Synth Metals 210:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burch KS, Mandrus D, Park JG (2018) Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563(7729):47

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Sunko .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sunko, V. (2019). Coupling of Metallic and Mott-Insulating States in PdCrO2. In: Angle Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy of Delafossite Metals. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31087-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics