Technology of Complex Activity

  • Mikhail V. BelovEmail author
  • Dmitry A. Novikov
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 86)


In this chapter, using the results of Belov and Novikov (Methodology of complex activity. Lenand, Moscow, 320 pp., 2018, [1]), the technology control problem for the complex activity (CA) of organizational and technical systems (OTSs) is formalized.


  1. 1.
    Belov M, Novikov D (2018) Methodology of complex activity. Lenand, Moscow, 320 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Novikov D (2013) Theory of control in organizations. Nova Science Publishers, New York, 341 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rebovich G, White B (2011) Enterprise systems engineering: advances in the theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 459 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Novikov A, Novikov D (2007) Methodology. Sinteg, Moscow, 668 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwab K (2016) The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum, Geneva, 172 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Smet A, Lund S, Schaininger W (2016) Organizing for the future, McKinsey Q, Jan 2016.
  7. 7.
    ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015 systems and software engineering—system life cycle processesGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), v2.0.2.
  9. 9.
    Henriques D, Martins JG, Zuliani P, Platzer A, Clarke EM (2012) Statistical model checking for Markov decision processes. In: International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST), London, pp 84–93Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aichernig B, Schumi R (2017) Statistical model checking meets property-based testing. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Tokyo, pp 390–400Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alagoz H, German R (2017) A selection method for black box regression testing with a statistically defined quality level. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Tokyo, pp 114–125Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ali S, Yue T (2015) U-test: evolving, modelling and testing realistic uncertain behaviours of cyber-physical systems. In: 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Graz, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bourque P, Fairley RE (eds) (2014) Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge, Version 3.0. IEEE Computer Society, 2014.
  14. 14.
    Legay A, Delahaye B, Bensalem S (2010) Statistical model checking: an overview. In: Barringer H et al (eds) Runtime Verification. RV 2010. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6418. Springer, Berlin, pp 122–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patrick M, Donnelly R, Gilligan C (2017) A toolkit for testing stochastic simulations against statistical oracles. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), Tokyo, pp 448–453Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yizhen C et al (2017) Effective online software anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA 2017), Santa Barbara, pp 136–146Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orseau L, Lattimore T, Hutter M (2013) Universal knowledge-seeking agents for stochastic environments. In: Jain S, Munos R, Stephan F, Zeugmann T (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 2013. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8139, Springer, Berlin, pp 158–172Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stocia G, Stack B (2017) Acquired knowledge as a stochastic process. Surv Math Appl 12:65–70MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wong A, Wang Y (2003) Pattern discovery: a data driven approach to decision support. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 33(1):114–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crawford J (1944) Learning curve, ship curve, ratios, related data. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, pp 122–128Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henderson B (1984) The application and misapplication of the learning curve. J Bus Strategy 4:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wright T (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 3(4):122–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chui D, Wong A (1986) Synthesizing knowledge: a cluster analysis approach using event covering. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 16(2):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leibowitz N, Baum B, Enden G, Karniel A (2010) The exponential learning equation as a function of successful trials results in sigmoid performance. J Math Psychol 54:338–340MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thurstone L (1919) The learning curve equation. Psychol Monogr 26(3):1–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thurstone L (1930) The learning function. J Gen Psychol 3:469–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sutton R, Barto A (2016) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Massachusetts, 455 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RH (1996) Handbook of modern item response theory, Springer, New York, 512 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shiryaev A (1973) Statistical sequential analysis: optimal stopping rules. American Mathematical Society, New York, 174 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mikami S, Kakazu Y (1993) Extended stochastic reinforcement learning for the acquisition of cooperative motion plans for dynamically constrained agents. In: Proceedings of IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference (SMC), Le Touquet, vol 4, pp 257–262Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Novikov D (1998) Laws of iterative learning. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences RAS, Moscow, 98 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBS CompanyMoscowRussia
  2. 2.V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations