Skip to main content

Abstract

This book analyses the battle for standardised cigarette packaging (‘plain packaging’) in Europe, drawing on the concepts of multi-level governance and policy transfer. This chapter provides the global context of the policy processes examined in the book and sets out the book’s aims and structure. It explains the importance of branding and pack design to transnational tobacco companies (TTCs), and details the emergence of related tobacco-control measures outside of Europe. In particular, it focuses on the introduction of standardised packaging in Australia. It then describes TTC political strategies in opposing such measures, via trade litigation and other methods. The chapter also sets out the research methods used to collect and analyse the empirical data used in the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bero, L. A. (2005). Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Reports, 120(2), 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertollini, R., Ribeiro, S., Mauer-Stender, K., & Galea, G. (2016). Tobacco control in Europe: A policy review. European Respiratory Reviews, 25, 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, A. M. (2012). Inventing conflicts of interest: A history of tobacco industry tactics. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CFTFKs. (2018). The Global Cigarette Industry. Centre for Tobacco-Free Kids. Available at https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/global/pdfs/en/Global_Cigarette_Industry_pdf.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2019.

  • Chapman, S., & Freeman, B. (2014). Removing the emperor’s clothes: Australia and tobacco plain packaging. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fooks, G., Smith, J., Lee, K., & Holden, C. (2017). Controlling corporate influence in health policy making? An assessment of the implementation of Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Globalization and Health, 13, 597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, A. B. (2012). Understanding the vector in order to plan effective tobacco control policies: An analysis of contemporary tobacco industry materials. Tobacco Control, 21, 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, A. B., Branston, J. R., & Sweanor, D. (2010). The case for OFSMOKE: How tobacco price regulation is needed to promote the health of markets, government revenue and the public. Tobacco Control, 19(5), 423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneiting, U., & Schmitz, H. P. (2016). Comparing global alcohol and tobacco control efforts: Network formation and evolution in international health governance. Health Policy Plan, 31(1), i98–i109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, N., & Ling, P. M. (2005). How Philip Morris built Marlboro into a global brand for young adults: Implications for international tobacco control. Tobacco Control, 14, 262–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B., & Holden, C. (2016). A corporate veto on health policy? Global constitutionalism and investor-state dispute settlement. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 13, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B., & Holden, C. (2018). European union implementation of article 5.3 of the framework convention on tobacco control. Globalization and Health, 14, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B., Holden, C., Eckhardt, J., & Lee, K. (2016). Reassessing policy paradigms: A comparison of the global tobacco and alcohol industries. Global Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1161815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B., Holden, C., & Mackinder, S. (2018). A multi-level, multi-jurisdictional strategy: Transnational tobacco companies’ attempts to obstruct tobacco packaging restrictions. Global Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2018.1446997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, L. (2012). Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: Promotion, packaging, price and place. Tobacco Control, 21, 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervey, T. K. (2001). Community and national competence in health after tobacco advertising. Common Market Law Review, 38(6), 1421–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C., & Hawkins, B. (2013). ‘Whisky gloss’: The alcohol industry, devolution and policy communities in Scotland. Public Policy & Administration, 28(3), 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C., & Lee, K. (2009). Corporate power and social policy: The political economy of the transnational tobacco companies. Global Social Policy, 9(3), 328–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C., & Hawkins, B. (2017). Law, market building and public health in the European Union. Global Social Policy, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, R. D., Ebbert, J. O., Muggli, M. E., Lockhart, N. J., & Robertson, C. R. (2009). Open doorway to truth: Legacy of the Minnesota tobacco trial. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 84(5), 446–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, H. (2015). The politics of trade and tobacco control. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, M., Hervey, T., & Gilmore, A. (2010). Public health policies. In E. Mossialos, G. Permanand, R. Baeten, & T. Hervey (Eds.), Health systems governance in Europe: The role of European Union law and policy (pp. 231–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, M., Bitton, A., & Glantz, S. (2002). Tobacco industry strategies for influencing European Community tobacco advertising legislation. Lancet, 359(9314), 1323–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivet, C., & Villareal, A. (2016, July 28). Who really won the legal battle between Philip Morris and Uruguay? The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/jul/28/who-really-won-legal-battle-philip-morris-uruguay-cigarette-adverts. Accessed 1 March 2019.

  • Peeters, S., Costa, H., Stuckler, D., McKee, M., & Gilmore, A. B. (2015). The revision of the 2014 European Tobacco Products Directive: An analysis of the tobacco industry’s attempts to ‘break the health silo’. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savell, E., Gilmore, A. B., Fooks, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2014). How does the tobacco industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review. PLoS One, 9, e87389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. E., Savell, E., & Gilmore, A. B. (2013). What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies. Tobacco Control, 22(2), 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voon, T., Mitchell, A., & Liberman, J. (Eds.). (2014). Regulating tobacco, alcohol and unhealthy foods: The legal issues. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weishaar, H., Collin, J., & Amos, A. (2016). Tobacco control and health advocacy in the European Union: Understanding effective coalition-building. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 18(2), 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigand, J. (1996). Jeffrey Wigand on 60 minutes. Available at http://www.jeffreywigand.com/60minutes.php. Accessed 5 February 2019.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2003). WHO framework convention on tobacco control [Online]. Available at https://www.who.int/tobacco/framework/WHO_FCTC_english.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2019.

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2008). MPOWER: A policy package to reverse the tobacco epidemic. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). Guidelines for implementation of the WHO FCTC. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Hawkins .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hawkins, B., Holden, C., Mackinder, S. (2020). Introduction. In: The Battle for Standardised Cigarette Packaging in Europe. Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31034-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics