Skip to main content

Understanding of Servicification Trends in China Through Analysis of Interindustry Network Structure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Service Systems, Operations Management, and Analytics (INFORMS-CSS 2019)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study analyses the core changes in the entire industrial structure of China from 2002 to 2015. First, utilizing the input–output model (or interindustry relation model), we evaluate the production-inducing effects across the various manufacturing and service sectors. Employing standard centrality measures that are often used in network analysis , we identify the status of various industry sectors together with their structural roles on the input–output network and track the evolutionary paths as they change over time. Furthermore, the clustering analysis of industrial sectors also examines critical changes in the overall industrial structure. We will discuss the policy implications of these evolutionary paths and explore the trends and sources of Chinese economic development regarding manufacturing and service productions. As a result, it can be seen that the production-inducing effects in the manufacturing sectors—particularly, chemical, electric power, and primary metal products—play the core role in driving the economy. On the other hand, the distribution sector like the traditional wholesale and retail services still shows unstable connections with other industries. However, the sectors like finance and transportation, which constitute another axis of the service industry, have strengthened their connection with the manufacturing sectors since 2012. Moreover, the real estate and lease and the other business support services continue to absorb production resources, deepen their linkages with the key service industries (e.g., transportation), and the various manufacturing sectors. In conclusion, China still has manufacturing as a central driving force for economic development, but with the increasing integration with the service sectors, both manufacturing and service industries show an apparent convergence in their production activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. P.R. Krugman, Geography and Trade (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.I. Riddle, Service-led growth. Int. Exec. 28(1), 27–28 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kwak, S. Yoo, J. Chang, The role of the maritime industry in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis. Mar. Policy 29(4), 371–383 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Hauknes, M. Knell, Embodied knowledge and sectoral linkages: an input-output approach to the interaction of high- and low-tech industries. Res. Policy 38(3), 459–469 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Xing, X. Ye, L. Kui, Measuring convergence of China’s ICT industry: an input-output analysis. Telecommun. Policy 35(4), 301–313 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Schweitzer, G. Fagiolo, D. Sornette, F. Vega-Redondo, A. Vespignani, D.R. White, Economic networks: the new challenges. Science 325(5939), 422–425 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Acemoglue, V. Carvalho, A. Ozdaglar, A. Tahbaz-Salehi, The network origines of aggregate fluctuation. Econometrica 80, 1977–2016 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S.S. Cho, S.W. Kang, An empirical study on network theory, economic structure and economic impact: technological and economic implications. J. Technol. Innov. 16, 937–953 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.A. Hidalgo, B. Klinger, A.L. Barabási, R. Hausmann, The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317(5837), 482–487 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. McNerney, B.D. Fath, G. Silverberg, Network structure of inter-industry flows. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 392(24), 6427–6441 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L.C. Freeman, Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1(3), 215–239 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L.C. Freeman, D. Roeder, R.R. Mulholland, Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Soc. Netw. 2(2), 119–141 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dohoon Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, Y., Kim, D. (2020). Understanding of Servicification Trends in China Through Analysis of Interindustry Network Structure. In: Yang, H., Qiu, R., Chen, W. (eds) Smart Service Systems, Operations Management, and Analytics. INFORMS-CSS 2019. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30967-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics