Skip to main content
  • 277 Accesses

Abstract

The government grew in size, scope, and responsibility during the Great Depression. By the end of World War II, the dominate position of public policy was that the government had a formal role in promoting economic outcomes. As the government grew to take on new roles, a reorganization became necessary. The new budgeting institutions, in particular the Bureau of the Budget, took on additional responsibilities. Congress and the White House also formerly engaged in a comprehensive policy to replace tariffs with taxes to finance federal spending but also to manage individual behavior. At the same time, the government came to be seen as having an active role in the economy. This was exemplified by the New Deal programs and the Employment Act of 1946.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    U.S. Bureau of the Budget, The Budget of the United States Government For the Fiscal year Ending June 30, 1941 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1940).

  2. 2.

    Major wars include the War of 1812, the Mexican–American War, the American Civil War, the Spanish–American War, and World War I. Recessions include periods of significant decline in economic activity equivalent to the National Bureau of Economic Research definition.

  3. 3.

    The Victory Liberty Loan Act of 1919 established a sinking fund. For details, see: Willoughby (1931).

  4. 4.

    John. F. Cogan, The High Cost of Good Intentions: A History of U.S. Federal Entitlement Programs (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2017).

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    J. Bradford De Long, “Keynesianism, Pennsylvania Avenue Style: Some Economic Consequences of the Employment Act of 1946,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, no. 3 (1996): 41–53.

  7. 7.

    Ibid.

  8. 8.

    Cogan, The High Cost of Good Intentions: A History of U.S. Federal Entitlement Programs.

  9. 9.

    “Republican Party Platforms: Republican Party Platform of 1936,” The American Presidency Project, June 9, 1936, https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/republican-party-platform-1936

  10. 10.

    Dennis S. Ippolito, Congressional Spending (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981).

  11. 11.

    Kennon and Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History.

  12. 12.

    Dennis Ippolito, Why Budgets Matter : Budget Policy and American Politics (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003).

  13. 13.

    Herbert L. Fenster and Christian Volz, “The Antideficiency Act: Constitutional Control Gone Astray”, Public Contract Law Journal 11, no. 1 (1979): 155–231.

  14. 14.

    Ibid.

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Ibid.

  18. 18.

    Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research, “US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions,” The National Bureau of Economic Research, September 20, 2010, https://www.nber.org/cycles.html

  19. 19.

    Michael D. Bordo, and David C. Wheelock, “Chapter Two – The Promise and Performance of the Federal Reserve as Lender of Last Resort 1914–1933” in The Origins, History, and Future of the Federal Reserve: A Return to Jekyll Island, ed. Michael D. Bordo and William Roberds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013): 59–98.

  20. 20.

    Ibid; Hugh Rockoff, “Until it’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I,” NBER Working Paper, no. w10580 (2004); Margaret G. Myers, A Financial History of the United States (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970).

  21. 21.

    Rockoff, “Until it’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I.”

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    Ibid.

  25. 25.

    Ippolito , Why Budgets Matter : Budget Policy and American Politics.

  26. 26.

    Rockoff, “Until it’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I.”

  27. 27.

    Kennon and Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History.

  28. 28.

    Ippolito , Why Budgets Matter : Budget Policy and American Politics.

  29. 29.

    Ibid.

  30. 30.

    Rockoff, “Until it’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I.”

  31. 31.

    Ibid.

  32. 32.

    Ibid.

  33. 33.

    Robert Barro, “Government Spending, Interest Rates, Prices, and Budget Deficits in the United Kingdom, 1701–1918”, Journal of Monetary Economics 20, no. 2 (1987): 221–247.

  34. 34.

    Kennon and Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History.

  35. 35.

    Rockoff, “Until it’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I”; Library of Congress, World War I Poster Collection.

  36. 36.

    Kennon and Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History.

  37. 37.

    Roy G. Blakey, “The War Revenue Act of 1917”, The American Economic Review 7, no. 4 (1917): 791–815.

  38. 38.

    Rockoff, “Until it’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I.”

  39. 39.

    Kennon and Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History.

  40. 40.

    Ippolito , Why Budgets Matter : Budget Policy and American Politics.

  41. 41.

    Kennon and Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History.

  42. 42.

    Eichengreen et al., “Public Debt Through the Ages.”

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    “Democratic Party Platforms, 1932 Democratic Party Platform,” The American Presidency Project, June 27, 1932, https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/1932-democratic-party-platform

  45. 45.

    Ippolito , Why Budgets Matter : Budget Policy and American Politics.

  46. 46.

    Ibid.

  47. 47.

    Ibid.

  48. 48.

    Ibid; Eichengreen et al., “Public Debt Through the Ages.”

  49. 49.

    Eichengreen et al., “Public Debt Through the Ages.”

  50. 50.

    In 1936, Roosevelt would also issue Executive Order Number 7298 empowering the Director of the Bureau of the Budget as the first line of approval, above the Attorney General, on all Executive Orders or Presidential Proclamations.

  51. 51.

    Beard and Smith (1933).

  52. 52.

    Fisher, “The Politics of Impounded Fund.”

  53. 53.

    Ibid.

  54. 54.

    “FDR: From Budget Balancer to Keynesian,” Franklin D. Roosevelt Library and Museum, https://www.fdrlibrary.org/budget

  55. 55.

    “President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Message to Congress Announcing a Program for Social Security, June 8, 1934,” U.S. Senate , National Archives and Record Administration.

  56. 56.

    Paul Winfree, “Bringing Proverbs to Policy: Classical Economics, Proverbial Wisdom, and Applications for Welfare Policy,” Social Science Research Network Working Paper (2018).

  57. 57.

    Cogan, The High Cost of Good Intentions: A History of U.S. Federal Entitlement Programs.

  58. 58.

    Ibid.

  59. 59.

    Ibid.

  60. 60.

    Byrd L. Jones, “The Role of Keynesians in Wartime Policy and Postwar Planning, 1940–1946,” The American Economic Review 62, no. 1/2 (1972): 125–133.

  61. 61.

    Ibid.

  62. 62.

    Ibid.

  63. 63.

    Ibid.

  64. 64.

    Ibid.

  65. 65.

    Ibid.

  66. 66.

    Ibid.

  67. 67.

    Ibid.

  68. 68.

    Ibid.

  69. 69.

    J. Bradford De Long, “Keynesianism, Pennsylvania Avenue Style: Some Economic Consequences of the Employment Act of 1946,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, no. 3 (1996): 41–53.

  70. 70.

    Ibid.

  71. 71.

    Alvin Hansen and Jacob Viner, “Two Discussions of the Employment Act of 1946 and Its Early Operation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 29, no. 2 (1947): 69–79. On general background regarding Hansen’s views on fiscal policy, see: (A. H. Hansen 1968).

  72. 72.

    Ibid.

  73. 73.

    De Long, “Keynesianism, Pennsylvania Avenue Style: Some Economic Consequences of the Employment Act of 1946.”

  74. 74.

    Ibid.

  75. 75.

    Ibid.

  76. 76.

    James Feyrer and Bruce Sacerdote, “Did the Stimulus Stimulate? Real Time Estimates of the Effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act,” NBER Working Paper, no. 16759 (2011). Feyrer and Sacerdote (2011) find that the cost of each additional job was between $100,000 and $400,000 implying a multiplier between 0.5 and 1.0.

  77. 77.

    James Buchanan, “Clarifying Confusion About the Balanced Budget Amendment,” National Tax Journal 48, no. 3 (1995): 347–355.

  78. 78.

    Kennon and Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History.

  79. 79.

    Ibid.

  80. 80.

    “Republican Party Platforms, Republican Party Platform of 1936,” The American Presidency Project, June 9, 1936, https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/republican-party-platform-1936

  81. 81.

    Roy G. Blakey and Gladys C. Blakey, “The Revenue Act of 1936,” The American Economic Review 26, no. 3 (1936): 466–482.

  82. 82.

    Ibid.

  83. 83.

    Roy G. Blakey and Gladys C. Blakey, “The Revenue Act of 1937,” The American Economic Review 28, no. 3 (1938): 447–458.

  84. 84.

    Ibid.

  85. 85.

    Ward Macy, “Social Security Taxes in the War Finance Program,” Journal of Political Economy 51, no. 2 (1943): 135–147.

  86. 86.

    Ibid.

  87. 87.

    Paul G. Kauper, “Significant Developments in the Law of Federal Taxation, 1941–1947: I,” Michigan Law Review 45, no. 6 (1947): 659–678.

  88. 88.

    The President’s Committee on Administrative Management, “The Report of the Committee with Studies of Administrative Management in the Federal Government” (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1937).

    Note: Commonly known as “The Brownlow Committee Report.”

  89. 89.

    Fisher, “The Politics of Impounded Funds.”

  90. 90.

    Ibid.

  91. 91.

    Ibid.

  92. 92.

    Brooke W. Graves, “Legislative Reference Service for the Congress of the United States.” The American Political Science Review 41, no. 2 (1947): 289–293.

  93. 93.

    Kennon and Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History.

  94. 94.

    Ibid.

  95. 95.

    L. B. Wheildon, “Legislative budget-making,” Editorial Research Reports 1948 1 (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1948).

  96. 96.

    Ibid.

  97. 97.

    Ibid.

  98. 98.

    Ibid.

  99. 99.

    Ibid.

References

  • Barro, Robert. 1987. “Government Spending, Interest Rates, Prices, and Budget Deficits in the United Kingdom, 1701–1918.” Journal of Monetary Economics 20 (2): 221–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, Charles A., and George H.E. Smith. 1933. The Future Comes: A Study of the New Deal. New York, NY: The MacMillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakey, Roy G. 1917. “The War Revenue Act of 1917.” The American Economic Review 7 (4): 791–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakey, Roy G., and Gladys C. Blakey. 1936. “The Revenue Act of 1936.” The American Economic Review 26 (3): 466–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakey, Roy G., and Gladys C. Blakey. 1938. “The Revenue Act of 1937.” The American Economic Review 28 (3): 447–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, Michael D., and David C. Wheelock. 2013. “Chapter Two – The Promise and Performance of the Federal Reserve as Lender of Last Resort 1914–1933.” In The Origins, History, and Future of the Federal Reserve: A Return to Jekyll Island, edited by Michael D. Bordo and William Roberds, 59–98. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. 1995. “Clarifying Confusion About the Balanced Budget Amendment.” National Tax Journal 48 (3): 347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogan, John F. 2017. The High Cost of Good Intentions: A History of U.S. Federal Entitlement Programs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Record. 76th Cong., 1st sess. 1939. July 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Long, J. Bradford. 1996. “Keynesianism, Pennsylvania Avenue Style: Some Economic Consequences of the Employment Act of 1946.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (3): 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1932. “Democratic Party Platforms, 1932 Democratic Party Platform.” The American Presidency Project. June 27. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/1932-democratic-party-platform.

  • Eichengreen, Barry, Asmaa El-Ganainy, Rui Redro Esteves, and Kris James Mitchener. 2019. Public Debt Through the Ages. Working Paper WP/19/6, Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2016. FDR: From Budget Balancer to Keynesian. https://www.fdrlibrary.org/budget.

  • Fenster, Herbert L., and Christian Volz. 1979. “The Antideficiency Act: Constitutional Control Gone Astray.” Public Contract Law Journal 11 (1): 155–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyrer, James, and Bruce Sacerdote. 2011. Did the Stimulus Stimulate? Real Time Estimates of the Effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Working Paper Number 16759, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, Brooke W. 1947. “Legislative Reference Service for the Congress of the United States.” The American Political Science Review 41 (2): 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Alvin, and Jacob Viner. 1947. “Two Discussions of the Employment Act of 1946 and Its Early Operation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (2): 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, Dennis S. 1981. Congressional Spending. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Deficits, Debt, and The New Politics of Tax Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Uncertain Legacies: Federal Budget Policy from Roosevelt through Reagan. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Why Budgets Matter: Budget Policy and American Politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Byrd L. 1972. “The Role of Keynesians in Wartime Policy and Postwar Planning.” The American Economic Review 62 (1/2): 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauper, Paul G. 1947. “Significant Developments in the Law of Federal Taxation, 1941–1947.” Michigan Law Review 45 (6): 659–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennon, David R., and M. Rebecca Rogers. 1989. The Committee on Ways and Means: A Bicentennial History, 1789–1989. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, Ward. 1943. “Social Security Taxes in the War Finance Program.” Journal of Political Economy 51 (2): 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Margaret G. 1970. A Financial History of the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1936. “Republican Party Platforms, Republican Party Platform of 1936.” The American Presidency Project. June 9. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/republican-party-platform-1936.

  • 1936. “Republican Party Platforms: Republican Party Platform of 1936.” The American Presidency Project. June 9. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/republican-party-platform-1936.

  • Rockoff, Hugh. 2004. “Until it’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I.” NBER Working Paper (w10580).

    Google Scholar 

  • The President’s Committee on Administrative Management. 1937. The Report of the Committee with Studies of Administrative Management in the Federal Government. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Budget. 1940. The Budget of the United States for the Fiscal Year Ending June 20, 1941. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1947. An Act for the establishment of the Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government. Public Law 80–162, July 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheildon, L.B. 1948. Legislative budget-making. Editorial Research Reports 1948, Vol. 1, Washington: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, W.F. 1931. Financial Condition and Operations of the National Government, 1921–1930. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, Paul. 2018. Bringing Proverbs to Policy: Classical Economics, Proverbial Wisdom, and Applications for Welfare Policy. Working Paper, Social Science Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Winfree, P. (2019). The End of Balanced Budgets. In: A History (and Future) of the Budget Process in the United States. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30959-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30959-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30958-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30959-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics