Skip to main content
  • 303 Accesses

Abstract

Conflict and ambiguity were built into the budget system from the beginning, requiring cooperation between equal branches constantly vying for power. The history of the budget process reflects a combination of how these branches have dealt with electoral politics as well as economic policy. When the budget process has been successful its structure does not have a material effect on the outcomes. However, it has not been very effective in helping to resolve fundamental disagreements about policy or politics. This problem has become heightened over time as the budget process has been asked to reflect more disputed matters. The introduction also examines the structure of the budget system in early America, including its weaknesses for managing public credit and the foundations for the new Constitution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Henry Shuman, Politics and the Budget: The Struggle Between the President and the Congress (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984). Shuman offers a good summary of more recent history and the inherent political power struggles between the president, Congress, and other institutions involved with the budget process.

  2. 2.

    Aaron Wildavsky, The Politics of the Budgetary Process (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1964). Many others have analyzed the connection between politics and the budget, including Rubin (2013), Sharkansky (1969) Fisher (2009), Ippolito (2012), and Witte (1985). Wildavsky (1975) finds that both political and economic factors are important for determining domestic agency budgets. Koven (1988) suggests that ideology affects budgeting decisions which can create either a system of political accountability or a budget derived based on “emotion and passion” thus threatening credibility.

  3. 3.

    David A. Stockman, The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed (New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1986).

  4. 4.

    Aaron Wildavsky, The Politics of the Budgetary Process (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1964); Charles Lindblom, “The science of ‘muddling through’,” Public Administration Review 19, (1959).

  5. 5.

    Allen Schick, Congress and Money: Budgeting, Spending, and Taxing (Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 1980); Charles H. Stewart, III, Budget Reform Politics: The Design of the Appropriations Process in the House of Representatives (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1989).

  6. 6.

    Oliver Blanchard, “Public Debt and Low Interest Rates,” American Economic Review 109, no. 4 (2019): 1197–1229.

  7. 7.

    Alberto Alesina, Carlo A. Favero, and Francesco Giavazzi, “What Do We Know about the Effects of Austerity?” AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association (2018): 524–530; Francesco Giavazzi and Marco Pagano, “Can Sever Fiscal Contractions be Expansionary? Tales of Two Small European Countries,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990, Volume 5, by Oliver Jean Blanchard and Stanley Fischer (1990): 75–122.

  8. 8.

    John Neville Keynes, The Scope and Method of Political Economy, 4th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1917).

  9. 9.

    Similar to LeLoup (1983) and others, this book does not imply that incrementalism is preferable as a normative strategy over a comprehensive approach to the federal budget.

  10. 10.

    Alice M. Rivlin, “Reform of the Budget Process,” The American Economic Review : Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association 74, no. 2 (1984): 133–137.

  11. 11.

    Courtenary Ilbert, Parliament : Its History, Constitution , and Practice, 3rd ed. (London: Oxford University Press, 1948); K.C. Wheare, Government by Committee (London: Oxford University Press, 1955); Kenneth Bradshaw and David Pring, Parliament and Congress (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1972).

  12. 12.

    S.J. Niefield, “The Development of the Budgetary Systems of the United States,” FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis 13, no. 4 (1951/1952): 606–614.

  13. 13.

    Jack P. Greene, “Political Mimesis: A Consideration of the Historical and Cultural Roots of Legislative Behavior in the British Colonies in the Eighteenth Century,” The American Historical Review 75, no. 2 (1969): 337–360.

  14. 14.

    David R. Kennon and M. Rebecca Rogers, The Committee on Ways and Means : A Bicentennial History, 1789–1989 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989).

  15. 15.

    Albert S. Bolles, Financial History of the United States from 1774 to 1789, Vol. I (New York, NY: Augustus M. Kelly Publishers, 1969).

  16. 16.

    For more on American debt during the early period and European capital markets, see Perkins (1994).

  17. 17.

    James Madison to Edmund Randolph, September 16–17, 1782, in The Papers of James Madison, vol. 5, ed. William T. Hutchinson and William M. E. Rachal (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967), 126–130.

  18. 18.

    Ibid. see note 11.

  19. 19.

    Douglas A. Irwin, “Revenue or Reciprocity? Founding Feuds Over Early U.S. Trade Policy,” in Founding Choices: American Economic Policy in the 1790s by Douglas A. Irwin and Richard Sylla (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2010).

  20. 20.

    John Adams, The Adams Papers: Papers of John Adams, vol. 15, ed. Gregg L. Lint, C. James Taylor, Robert F. Karachuk, Hobson Woodward, Margaret A. Hogan, Sara B. Sikes, Mary T. Claffey, and Karen N. Barzilay (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010): 300–301.

  21. 21.

    The Philadelphia Journal and Weekly Advertiser, September 17, 1783.

  22. 22.

    Thomas Jefferson to Robert Morris – with Draft of Circulation Letter to the States, March 30, 1784, in The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 7, ed. Julian P. Boyd (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1953), 53–56.

  23. 23.

    George Washington to James Warren, October 7, 1785, in The Papers of George Washington, Confederation Series, vol. 3, ed. W. W. Abbot (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1994), 298–301.

  24. 24.

    Edmund Pendleton to James Madison, December 9, 1786, in The Papers of James Madison, vol. 9, ed. Robert A. Rutland and William M. E. Rachal (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1975), 201–204.

  25. 25.

    Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, May 3, 1788, in The Papers of James Madison, vol. 11, ed. Robert A. Rutland and Charles F. Hobson (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1977), 33–38.

References

  • Adams, John. The Adams Papers: Papers of John Adams, vol. 15, June 1783–January 1784, edited by Gregg L. Lint, C. James Taylor, Robert F. Karachuk, Hobson Woodward, Margaret A. Hogan, Sara B. Sikes, Mary T. Claffey, and Karen N. Barzilay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, Alberto, Carlo A. Favero, and Francesco Giavazzi. 2018. “What Do We Know about the Effects of Austerity?” AEA Papers and Proceedings. American Economic Association. 524–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, Oliver. 2019. “Public Debt and Low Interest Rates.” American Economic Review 109 (4): 1197–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolles, Albert S. 1969. Financial History of the United States from 1774 to 1789. Vol. I. 3 vols. New York, NY: Augustus M. Kelly Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, Kenneth, and David Pring. 1972. Parliament and Congress. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Patrick. 2009. The Politics of Taxing and Spending. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giavazzi, Francesco, and Marco Pagano. 1990. “Can Severe Fiscal Contractions be Expansionary? Tales of Two Small European Countries.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990, Volume 5, by Oliver Jean Blanchard and Stanley Fischer, 75–122. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jack P. 1969. “Political Mimesis: A Consideration of the Historical and Cultural Roots of Legislative Behavior in the British Colonies in the Eighteenth Century.” The American Historical Review 75 (2): 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbert, Courtenay. 1948. Parliament: Its History, Constitution, and Practice. 3. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, Dennis S. 2012. Deficits, Debt, and The New Politics of Tax Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Douglas. 2010. “Revenue or Reciprocity? Founding Feuds Over Early U.S. Trade Policy.” In Founding Choices: American Economic Policy in the 1790s, by Douglas Irwin and Richard Sylla. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, Thomas. 1953. “Letter to Robert Morris – with Draft of Circulation Letter to the States, 30 March 1784.” In The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 7, edited by Julian P. Boyd, 53–56. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, Thomas. 1977. “Letter to James Madison, 3 May 1788.” In The Papers of James Madison, vol. 11, edited by Robert A. Rutland and Charles F. Hobson, 33–38. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennon, David R., and M. Rebecca Rogers. 1989. The Committee on Ways and Means: A Bicentennial History, 1789–1989. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John Neville. 1917. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. 4th. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koven, Steven G. 1988. Ideological Budgeting: The Influence of Political Philosophy on Public Policy. New York, NY: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeLoup, Lance T. 1983. “The Myth of Incrementalism: Analytical Choices in Budgetary Theory.” In Public Budgeting and Finance: Behavioral, Theoretical, and Technical Perspectives, by Robert T. Golembiewski and Jack Rubin. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Charles. 1959. “The science of ‘muddling through’.” Public Administration Review 19: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, James. 1967. “Letter to Edmund Randolph, 16–17 September 1782.” In The Papers of James Madison, vol. 5, edited by William T. Hutchinson and William M. E. Rachal, 126–130. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niefield, S.J. 1951/1952. “The Development of the Budgetary Systems of the United States.” FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis 13 (4): 606–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, Edmund. 1975. “Letter to James Madison, 9 December 1786.” In The Papers of James Madison, vol. 9, edited by Robert A. Rutland and William M. E. Rachal, 201–204. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, Edwin J. 1994. American Public Finance and Financial Services. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, Alice M. 1984. “Reform of the Budget Process.” The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association 74 (2): 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Irene S. 2013. The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing. Seventh. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, James D. 1988. Balanced Budget and American Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, Allen. 1980. Congress and Money: Budgeting, Spending, and Taxing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkansky, Ira. 1969. The Politics of Taxing and Spending. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, Howard. 1984. Politics and the Budget: The Struggle Between the President and the Congress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Charles H., III. 1989. Budget Reform Politics: The Design of the Appropriations Process in the House of Representatives, 1865–1921. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stockman, David A. 1986. The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Philadelphia Journal and Weekly Advertiser. September 17, 1783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, George. 1994. “Letter to James Warren, 7 October 1785.” In The Papers of George Washington, Confederation Series, vol. 3, edited by W. W. Abbot, 298–301. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheare, K.C. 1955. Government by Committee. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. The New Politics of the Budget Process. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, John F. 1985. The Politics and Development of the Federal Income Tax. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Winfree, P. (2019). Introduction. In: A History (and Future) of the Budget Process in the United States. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30959-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30959-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30958-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30959-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics