Skip to main content

Voting Rules in Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systems, Procedures and Voting Rules in Context

Abstract

All societies have rules. Some are explicitly based on them, but in general rules take on many forms. They can strict and formal or ambiguous and informal or something between these extremes. Many rules have a clear-cut motivation. Some pertain to coordination such as the traffic rules. Some have the aim of avoiding collectively irrational or harmful outcomes. The rules prohibiting cartel formation are examples of these. This book deals with the problems of choosing rules. More specifically, our focus is on rules of collective decision making. We study the most common collective decision making rules singling out the advantages and disadvantages using well-defined criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to its assumed plausibility as a model of many kinds of social interactions, Prisoner’s Dilemma has generated a truly voluminous literature. Much of it is of experimental nature and seeks explanations for the common deviations from individual benefit-maximization.

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1958). Theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (1984). Voting procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1992). Local justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, H. (1980). Ways out of the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Quality & Quantity, 14, 743–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, H. (1983). Voting procedures: A summary analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 13, 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, H. (1987). Comparing voting systems. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P. D. (1980). Topics in the theory of voting. Boston: Birkhäuser.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman-Margalit, E. (1977). The emergence of norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adiel Teixeira de Almeida .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C., Nurmi, H. (2019). Voting Rules in Context. In: Systems, Procedures and Voting Rules in Context . Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30955-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics