Skip to main content

Growth and Yield of Field Crops Grown Under Drought Stress Condition Is Influenced by the Application of PGPR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Field Crops: Sustainable Management by PGPR

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development and Biodiversity ((SDEB,volume 23))

Abstract

Water stress causes significant losses to agriculture crops mostly grown in rainfed condition. Water stress affects the plant–water relation that causes specific and nonspecific damages to crop. Water stress is categorized as the dominant abiotic stress that is responsible for secondary stresses including oxidative stress that has hazardous effects on the biomolecules of cell. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculated plants grow well under biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant survival in abiotic stresses defends on many adaptations and mitigation strategies. PGPR play dominant role in protecting plants from these stresses either directly or indirectly. PGPR colonize the rhizosphere and impose tolerance by producing different metabolites and other volatile compounds and by regulating gene expression and altering root morphology under water scarcity. PGPR influence physiology of plant in response to drought. Considerable growth in cereals has been noted in response to bacterial inoculation. PGPRs like Azospirillum , Pseudomonas , Bacillus and Azotobacter are associated with plant roots, improve shoot and root growth and drought tolerance; however, current works unveiled that PGPRs not have just stimulated the systemic tolerance to abiotic stresses but also improve nutrient uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmadi A, Baker DA (2001) The effect of water stress on grain filling processes in wheat. J Agric Sci 136(3):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi P, Starcher M, Zachow C, Müller H, Berg G (2013) Root-microbe systems: the effect and mode of interaction of stress protecting agent (SPA) Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T. Front Plant Sci 4:141

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anjum SA, Xie XY, Wang LC, Saleem MF, Man C, Lei W (2011) Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr J Agric Res 6(9):2026–2032

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoun H, Prévost D (2005) Ecology of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Siddqui ZA (ed) PGPR: Biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Armada E, Roldán A, Azcon R (2014) Differential activity of autochthonous bacteria in controlling drought stress in native Lavandula and Salvia plants species under drought conditions in natural arid soil. Microb Ecol 67(2):410–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad M, Shaharoona B, Mahmood T (2008) Inoculation with Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase partially eliminates the effects of drought stress on growth, yield, and ripening of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pedosphere 18(5):611–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Asrar AWA, Elhindi KM (2011) Alleviation of drought stress of marigold (Tagetes erecta) plants by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Saudi J Biol Sci 18(1):93–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balloi A, Rolli E, Marasco R, Mapelli F, Tamagnini I, Cappitelli F, Borin S, Daffonchio D (2010) The role of microorganisms in bioremediation and phytoremediation of polluted and stressed soils. Agrochimia 54(6):353–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber VA, Juday GP, Finney BP (2000) Reduced growth of Alaskan white spruce in the twentieth century from temperature-induced drought stress. Nature 405(6787):668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bashan A, Bartsch RP, Kantelhardt JW, Havlin S, Ivanov PC (2012) Network physiology reveals relations between network topology and physiological function. Nat Comm 3:702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashan Y (1998) Inoculants of plant growth-promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnol Adv 16(4):729–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belimov AA, Dodd IC, Hontzeas N, Theobald JC, Safronova VI, Davies WJ (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling. New Phytol 181(2):413–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg G (2009) Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84(1):11–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg G, Grube M, Schloter M, Smalla K (2014) Unraveling the plant microbiome: looking back and future perspectives. Front Microbiol 5:148

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28(4):1327–1350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2005) Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Aus J Agric Res 56(11):1159–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassán F, Vanderleyden J, Spaepen S (2014) Physiological and agronomical aspects of phytohormone production by model plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) belonging to the genus Azospirillum. J Plant Growth Regul 33(2):440–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2009) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annal Bot 103(4):551–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osório ML, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C (2002) How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Annal Bot 89(7):907–916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, Kim JS (2013) Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 31(3):230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clement M, Lambert A, Herouart D, Boncompagni E (2008) Identification of new up-regulated genes under drought stress in soybean nodules. Gene 426(1):15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A (2010) Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 42(5):669–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conlin LK, Nelson HC (2007) The natural osmolyte trehalose is a positive regulator of the heat-induced activity of yeast heat shock transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol 27(4):1505–1515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desclaux D, Roumet P (1996) Impact of drought stress on the phenology of two soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) cultivars. Field Crop Res 46(1–3):61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd AN, Salathia N, Hall A, Kévei E, Tóth R, Nagy F, Hibberd JM, Millar AJ, Webb AA (2005) Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309(5734):630–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey A, Kumar A, Abd_Allah EF, Hashem A, Khan ML (2019) Growing more with less: breeding and developing drought resilient soybean to improve food security. Ecol Ind 105:425–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Podile AR (2010) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): the bugs to debug the root zone. Crit Rev Microbiol 36(3):232–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Earl HJ, Davis RF (2003) Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize. Agron J 95(3):688–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egamberdieva D, Kamilova F, Validov S, Gafurova L, Kucharova Z, Lugtenberg B (2008) High incidence of plant growth-stimulating bacteria associated with the rhizosphere of wheat grown on salinated soil in Uzbekistan. Environ Microbiol 10(1):1–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq M, Hussain M, Wahid A, Siddique KHM (2012) Drought stress in plants: an overview. In: Ricardo A (ed) Plant responses to drought stress. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. In: Lichtfouse E et al (eds) Sustainable agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 153–188

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farooq M, Wahid A, Lee DJ, Cheema SA, Aziz T (2010) Drought stress: comparative time course action of the foliar applied glycinebetaine, salicylic acid, nitrous oxide, brassinosteroids and spermine in improving drought resistance of rice. J Agro Crop Sci 196(5):336–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fathi A, Tari DB (2016) Effect of drought stress and its mechanism in plants. Int J Life Sci 10(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo MDVB, Bonifacio A, Rodrigues AC, de Araujo FF (2016) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: key mechanisms of action. In: Devendra K et al (eds) Microbial-mediated induced systemic resistance in plants. Springer, Singapore, pp 23–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franco-Correa M, Quintana A, Duque C, Suarez C, Rodríguez MX, Barea JM (2010) Evaluation of actinomycete strains for key traits related with plant growth promotion and mycorrhiza helping activities. Appl Soil Ecol 45(3):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukai S, Pantuwan G, Jongdee B, Cooper M (1999) Screening for drought resistance in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Res 64(1–2):61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge TD, Sui FG, Bai LP, Lu YY, Zhou GS (2006) Effects of water stress on the protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in roots and leaves of summer maize. Agric Sci China 5(4):291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D, Garcia M, Condori O, Mamani J, Miranda R, Cusicanqui J, Taboada C, Yucra E, Vacher J (2008) Could deficit irrigation be a sustainable practice for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the Southern Bolivian Altiplano? Agric Water Manag 95(8):909–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:329–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant–bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37(3):395–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gusain YS, Kamal R, Mehta CM, Singh US, Sharma AK (2015) Phosphate solubilizing and indole-3-acetic acid producing bacteria from the soil of Garhwal Himalaya aimed to improve the growth of rice. J Environ Biol 36(1):301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker M, Schumann W, Völker U (1996) Heat-shock and general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 19(3):417–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heidari M, Mousavinik SM, Golpayegani A (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) effect on physiological parameters and mineral uptake in basil (Ociumum basilicm L.) under water stress. ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 6(5):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaleel CA, Gopi R, Sankar B, Gomathinayagam M, Panneerselvam R (2008) Differential responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress. Comptes Rendus Biol 331(1):42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Wahid A, Farooq M, Al-Juburi HJ, Somasundaram R, Panneerselvam R (2009) Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int J Agric Biol 11(1):100–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamara AY, Menkir A, Badu-Apraku B, Ibikunle O (2003) The influence of drought stress on growth, yield and yield components of selected maize genotypes. J Agric Sci 141(1):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasim WA, Osman ME, Omar MN, El-Daim IAA, Bejai S, Meijer J (2013) Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria. J Plant Growth Regul 32(1):122–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan N, Bano A (2016a) Modulation of phytoremediation and plant growth by the treatment with PGPR, Ag nanoparticle and untreated municipal wastewater. Int J Phytoremed 18(12):1258–1269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan N, Bano A (2016b) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and Ag-nano particle in the bioremediation of heavy metals and maize growth under municipal wastewater irrigation. Int J Phytoremed 18(3):211–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan N, Bano A, Babar MA (2017) The root growth of wheat plants, the water conservation and fertility status of sandy soils influenced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Symbiosis 72(3):195–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan N, Bano A, Rahman MA, Rathinasabapathi B, Babar MA (2018) UPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) metabolome following long-term drought stress. Plant Cell Environ 42(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1981) Development of a powder formulation of rhizobacteria for inoculation of potato seed pieces. Phytopathol 71(6):590–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW (2003) A review of mechanisms for plant growth promotion by PGPR. In: 6th international PGPR workshop, October, vol 10, pp 5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Verma JP (2017) Does plant—Microbe interaction confer stress tolerance in plants: a review? Microbiol Res 207:41–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lelieveld J, Beirle S, Hörmann C, Stenchikov G, Wagner T (2015) Abrupt recent trend changes in atmospheric nitrogen dioxide over the Middle East. Sci Adv 1(7):e1500498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Ye W, Wang M, Yan X (2009) Climate change and drought: a risk assessment of crop-yield impacts. Clim Res 39(1):31–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim JH, Kim SD (2013) Induction of drought stress resistance by multi-functional PGPR Bacillus licheniformis K11 in pepper. Plant Pathol J 29(2):201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Liu Y, Guo K, Fan D, Li G, Zheng Y, Yu L, Yang R (2011) Effect of drought on pigments, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzymes in six woody plant species in karst habitats of southwestern China. Environ Exp Bot 71(2):174–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucy M, Reed E, Glick BR (2004) Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 86(1):1–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manivannan P, Jaleel CA, Somasundaram R, Panneerselvam R (2008) Osmoregulation and antioxidant metabolism in drought-stressed Helianthus annuus under triadimefon drenching. Comptes Rendus Biol 331(6):418–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marasco R, Rolli E, Ettoumi B, Vigani G, Mapelli F, Borin S, Abou-Hadid AF, El-Behairy UA, Sorlini C, Cherif A, Zocchi G (2012) A drought resistance-promoting microbiome is selected by root system under desert farming. PLoS ONE 7:e48479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez JP, Silva H, Ledent JF, Pinto M (2007) Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euro J Agron 26(1):30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (1999) Effect of wild-type and mutant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the rooting of mung bean cuttings. J Plant Growth Regul 18(2):49–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster GS, White JW, Weiss A, Baenziger PS, Wilhelm WW, Porter JR, Jamieson PD (2008) Simulating crop phenological responses to water deficits. Response of crops to limited water: understanding and modeling water stress effects on plant growth processes, pp 277–300 (Response of Crops)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzaeva OV, Shirokikh IG (2010) The production of auxins by the endophytic bacteria of winter rye. Appl Biochem Microbiol 46(1):44–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra V, Cherkauer KA (2010) Retrospective droughts in the crop growing season: implications to corn and soybean yield in the Midwestern United States. Agric Forest Meteorol 150(7–8):1030–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan PW, He CJ, De Greef JA, Maurice P (1990) Does water deficit stress promote ethylene synthesis by intact plants? Plant Physiol 94(4):1616–1624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Muleta D, Assefa F, Börjesson E, Granhall U (2013) Phosphate-solubilising rhizobacteria associated with Coffea arabica L. in natural coffee forests of south western Ethiopia. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 12(1):73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair AS, Abraham TK, Jaya DS (2008) Studies on the changes in lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in drought stress induced cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) varieties. J Environ Biol 29:689–691

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nam NH, Chauhan YS, Johansen C (2001) Effect of timing of drought stress on growth and grain yield of extra-short-duration pigeonpea lines. J Agric Sci 136(2):179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naseem H, Bano A (2014) Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their exopolysaccharide in drought tolerance of maize. J Plant Interact 9(1):689–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nihorimbere V, Ongena M, Smargiassi M, Thonart P (2011) Beneficial effect of the rhizosphere microbial community for plant growth and health. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 15(2):327–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Setter TL, Madison JT, Thompson JF, Shapiro PS (1991) Influence of water deficit on maize endosperm development: enzyme activities and RNA transcripts of starch and zein synthesis, abscisic acid, and cell division. Plant Physiol 97(1):154–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oh SJ, Song SI, Kim YS, Jang HJ, Kim SY, Kim M, Kim YK, Nahm BH, Kim JK (2005) Arabidopsis CBF3/DREB1A and ABF3 in transgenic rice increased tolerance to abiotic stress without stunting growth. Plant Physiol 138(1):341–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Placella SA, Brodie EL, Firestone MK (2012) Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(27):10931–10936

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rahdari P, Hosseini SM, Tavakoli S (2012) The studying effect of drought stress on germination, proline, sugar, lipid, protein and chlorophyll content in purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) leaves. J Med Plants Res 6(9):1539–1547

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampino P, Pataleo S, Gerardi C, Mita G, Perrotta C (2006) Drought stress response in wheat: physiological and molecular analysis of resistant and sensitive genotypes. Plant Cell Environ 29(12):2143–2152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rani MU, Arundhathi A, Reddy G (2012) Screening of rhizobacteria containing plant growth promoting (PGPR) traits in rhizosphere soils and their role in enhancing growth of pigeon pea. Afr J Biotechnol 11(32):8085–8091

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M (2004) Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol 161(11):1189–1202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolli E, Marasco R, Vigani G, Ettoumi B, Mapelli F, Deangelis ML, Gandolfi C, Casati E, Previtali F, Gerbino R, Pierotti Cei F (2015) Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root-associated microbiome as a water stress-dependent trait. Environ Microbiol 17(2):316–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi F, Potrafka RM, Pichel FG, De Philippis R (2012) The role of the exopolysaccharides in enhancing hydraulic conductivity of biological soil crusts. Soil Biol Biochem 46:33–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem M, Arshad M, Hussain S, Bhatti AS (2007) Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34(10):635–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samarah NH (2005) Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley. Agron Sustain Dev 25(1):145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhya V, Ali SZ, Grover M, Reddy G, Venkateswarlu B (2010) Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 62(1):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangoi L (2001) Understanding plant density effects on maize growth and development: an important issue to maximize grain yield. Ciência Rural 31(1):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M (2007) Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88(6):1386–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt R, Köberl M, Mostafa A, Ramadan EM, Monschein M, Jensen KB, Bauer R, Berg G (2014) Effects of bacterial inoculants on the indigenous microbiome and secondary metabolites of chamomile plants. Front Microbiol 5:64

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon RS, Lin H, Childs KL, Hansey CN, Buell CR, de Leon N, Kaeppler SM (2011) Genome-wide atlas of transcription during maize development. Plant J 66(4):553–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sgherri C, Maffei M, Navari-Izzo F (2000) Antioxidative enzymes in wheat subjected to increasing water deficit and rewatering. J Plant Physiol 157(3):273–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddique MRB, Hamid A, Islam MS (2000) Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Bot Bull Acad Sinica 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui ZA (2005) PGPR: prospective biocontrol agents of plant pathogens. In: Siddiqui ZA (ed) PGPR: biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 111–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Simões-Araújo JL, Rumjanek NG, Margis-Pinheiro M (2003) Small heat shock proteins genes are differentially expressed in distinct varieties of common bean. Braz J Plant Physiol 15(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnoff N (1993) The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytol 125(1):27–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taiz L, Zeiger E (2006) Water and plant cells. Plant physiology, 4th edn. Sinauer Associates Inc, p 672

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa GD, Dey M, Sahoo L, Panda SK (2011) An insight into the drought stress induced alterations in plants. Biol Plant 55(4):603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiemann LK, Billings SA (2011) Changes in variability of soil moisture alter microbial community C and N resource use. Soil Biol Biochem 43(9):1837–1847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timmusk S, Paalme V, Pavlicek T, Bergquist J, Vangala A, Danilas T, Nevo E (2011) Bacterial distribution in the rhizosphere of wild barley under contrasting microclimates. PLoS ONE 6(3):e17968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vardharajula S, Zulfikar Ali S, Grover M, Reddy G, Bandi V (2011) Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp.: effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress. J Plant Interact 6(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Nasrulhaq BA (2016) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability—a review. Molecules 21(5):57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255(2):571–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Rad U, Klein I, Dobrev PI, Kottova J, Zazimalova E, Fekete A, Hartmann A, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Durner J (2008) Response of Arabidopsis thaliana to N-hexanoyl-DL-homoserine-lactone, a bacterial quorum sensing molecule produced in the rhizosphere. Planta 229(1):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61(3):199–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong L, Wang RG, Mao G, Koczan JM (2006) Identification of drought tolerance determinants by genetic analysis of root response to drought stress and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol 142(3):1065–1074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Wu Y, Li Y, Ling HQ, Chu C (2009) OsMT1a, a type 1 metallothionein, plays the pivotal role in zinc homeostasis and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol 70(1–2):219–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yin A, Jia Y, Qiu T, Gao M, Cheng S, Wang X, Sun Y (2018) Poly-γ-glutamic acid improves the drought resistance of maize seedlings by adjusting the soil moisture and microbial community structure. Appl Soil Ecol 129:128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahir ZA, Munir A, Asghar HN, Shaharoona B, Arshad M (2008) Effectiveness of rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase for growth promotion of peas (Pisum sativum) under drought conditions. J Microbiol Biotechnol 18(5):958–963

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Wang X, Jiao Y, Qin Y, Liu X, He K, Chen C, Ma L, Wang J, Xiong L, Zhang Q (2007) Global genome expression analysis of rice in response to drought and high-salinity stresses in shoot, flag leaf, and panicle. Plant Mol Biol 63(5):591–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asghari Bano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The author(s) have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khan, N., Bano, A. (2019). Growth and Yield of Field Crops Grown Under Drought Stress Condition Is Influenced by the Application of PGPR. In: Maheshwari, D., Dheeman, S. (eds) Field Crops: Sustainable Management by PGPR. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30926-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics