Abstract
Land plays a central role in the production function and economic development. Land enters the production function as a primary input into the production process together with labour, capital, technical change and entrepreneurship. Land is a significant asset and agricultural products make up a large portion of national income. This chapter reviews land redistributed between 1994 and 2017, the role of land in the production function and the evolution of area planted in various agricultural sector commodities. The trends show that the land reform programme has failed to meet the set target of redistributing 30 per cent (85 million hectares) of agricultural land by 2014 by a wide margin. The breakdown of land redistributed by province shows that more than a quarter of the land redistributed is in the Northern Cape. The Northern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal have been the biggest beneficiaries of land reform and restitution in terms of hectares. In addition, women are a minority of beneficiaries of the land redistribution policy in a majority of provinces. Statistics show that women beneficiaries make up less than one quarter of beneficiaries of land redistribution. However, data shows that the Northern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal contribute less to the agricultural sector and the economy. Hence, we argue that the accelerated land reform policy is a necessary but insufficient condition to increase the agricultural sector output growth, reduce the unemployment rate, high poverty and inequality rates. Post-settlement support should be an integral part of the policy output in order to achieve a long-term sustainable development outcomes. Thus, policy interventions should be designed to ensure that post-settlement support cuts across all major land reform programmes, namely, redistribution, land tenure and restitution. In addition, policy interventions should provide a comprehensive post-settlement reconstruction and development programme plan.
Therefore, the policies of accelerated land reform and expropriation of land without compensation must be accompanied by productive utilisation of land as captured in the Land and Agricultural Development Bank Act (2002), a holistic approach to post-settlement support and favourable trade policies. At the same time, the policy of accelerated land reform that results in an increase in hectares (area) planted can create a class of entrepreneurs and self-employed people through the formation of co-operatives, and small and medium enterprises. This is another channel through which output growth and employment growth can be created.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All these inputs into the production function are well captured in the primary objectives of the Land Bank. See for further reading http://www.treasury.gov.za/legislation/acts/2002/a15-02.pdf.
- 2.
We showed that these supportive policy interventions include, for example, provision of persistent investment in supportive infrastructure, ample funding for housing, sanitation, agricultural development and revolution, innovation, productivity, profitability and so on.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
See earlier chapters.
- 6.
- 7.
See for further reading http://www.grainsa.co.za/an-overview-of-potential-export-markets-for-south-african-groundnuts.
References
Adamopoulos, T., and Restuccia, D. 2019. Land Reform and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis with Micro Data. NBER Working Paper No. 25780. https://www.nber.org/papers/w25780.pdf.
Aliber, M. 2015. Unravelling the Willing Buyer/Willing Seller Question. In B. Cousins, and C. Walker (eds.) Land Divided: Land in South African Society in 2014 and Beyond, Jacana: Johannesburg.
Ando, A., and Nassar, K. 2017. Indexing Structural Distortions: Sectoral Productivity, Structural Change and Growth. IMF Working Paper WP/17/205.
Azadi, H., and Vanhaute, E. 2019. Mutual Effects of Land Distribution and Economic Development: Evidence from Asia, Africa, and Latin America. MDPI Journal for Land, 8, 96.
BFAP. 2011a. The South African Agricultural Baseline. Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy. https://www.sagis.org.za/BFAP_2011.pdf
BFAP. 2011b. The Contribution of the Agro-Industrial Complex to Employment in South Africa. Tech. Rep. June, The Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy, Pretoria.
Greenberg, S. 2010. Status Report on Land and Agricultural Policy in South Africa. Research Report. School of Government, UWC PLAAS Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies. http://www.plaas.org.za/sites/default/files/publications-pdf/RR40.pdf
Jacobs, P., Lahiff, E., and Hall, R. 2003a. Evaluating Land and Agrarian Reform in South Africa Series; No. 1: Land Redistribution. PLAAS, University of the Western Cape: Cape Town.
Jacobs, P., Lahiff, E., and Hall. R. 2003b. Who Will Benefit from Land Reform?[online]. The Star, October 10. Available on the Internet at: http://www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=129&fArticleId=258159 (29 June 2004).
Liebenberg, F. 2012. South African Agricultural Production, Productivity and Research Performance in the 20th Century. Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria.
McKinsey & Company. 2015. South Africa’s Big Five: Bold Priorities for Inclusive Growth. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/Middle%20East%20and%20Africa/South%20Africas%20bold%20priorities%20for%20inclusive%20growth/South_Africas_big_five_bold_priorities_for_inclusive_growth%20Full_report.ashx
Netshipale, A.J., Oosting, S.J., Raidimi, E.N., Mashiloane, M.L., and De Boer, I.J.M. 2007. Land Reform in South Africa: Beneficiary Participation and Impact on Land Use in the Waterberg District. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 83, 57–66.
PLAAS (Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies). 2018. Submission to the Constitutional Review Committee. University of the Western Cape.
Restuccia, D., and Rogerson, R. 2008. Policy Distortions and Aggregate Productivity with Heterogeneous Establishments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), 707–20.
Samayende, S. 2005. Land Reform a ‘Dismal Failure’. City Press, July 14, p. 7.
Sepaela, P. 2006a. Summit’s Resolutions to go Public. In DLA: Land News. Government Printer, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 6–10.
Sepaela, P. 2006b. Nkuzi Has Its Say. In DLA: Land News. Government Printer, Pretoria, South Africa, pp. 14–16.
Sihlobo, W. 2013. An Overview of Potential Export Markets for South African Groundnuts. Grain SA. https://www.grainsa.co.za/an-overview-of-potential-export-markets-for-south-african-groundnuts
Umrabulo. 2018. Lets’ Talk. Umrabulo No. 43, August 2018. https://www.anc1912.org.za/umrabulo-43-2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gumata, N., Ndou, E. (2019). Land Redistributed between 1994 and 2017, the Production Function and the Evolution of Area Planted in Various Agricultural Sector Commodities. In: Accelerated Land Reform, Mining, Growth, Unemployment and Inequality in South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30884-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30884-1_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30883-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30884-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)