Abstract
Is there a balance sheet channel transmitting negative shocks to mining commodity prices and exchange rate depreciations into the mining sector investment, foreign debt and intermediate imports? Evidence in this chapter indicates that mining investment declines and remains depressed in response to a real exchange rate depreciation shock. The real exchange rate depreciation shocks are transmitted more via the balance sheet items of foreign debt and the importation of intermediate goods which are largely representative of inputs to the production process and investment. Are the responses of investment, foreign debt and intermediate imports different to a decline in mining commodity prices? We find that investment growth and foreign debt are more responsive to a decline in commodity prices. The results affirm the centrality of the balance sheet channel in transmitting negative shocks to commodity prices demand for mining commodities and exchange rate depreciation shocks.
Is an investment-led strategy superior in the mining sector? Yes, evidence in this chapter shows that investment growth is a necessary but insufficient condition. Commodity prices are an important part of a thriving mining sector. A concurrence of an increase in commodity prices and demand for mining exports augers well for mining investment growth. In particular, we find that persistent shocks, especially of positive shocks to commodity prices, lead to persistently higher levels of mining investment as opposed to non-persistent shocks. The interaction of the exchange rate dynamics and balance sheet effects drive the business cycle in the mining sector. In turn, these are highly complemented and propagated by commodity price cycles and how persistent they are.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The contractionary effects of large real exchange rate depreciation can occur due to the cost of inputs and foreign currency-denominated debt resulting in foreign currency mismatches on balance sheets of firms.
- 2.
It can even exert negative effects.
- 3.
Nonetheless, studies show that if firms were perfectly hedged, currency depreciations should not have any relevant negative balance sheet consequences.
- 4.
Serena and Sousa (2018) use the country-specific bilateral exchange rates to the US dollar and focus mainly on exchange rate depreciations.
- 5.
The HLM effect suggests that an exogenous increase in terms-of-trade leads to an improvement in the country’s trade balance if the marginal propensity to consume is lower than one.
- 6.
This approach predicts that the adjustment of the current account to a positive shock to terms-of-trade will differ, depending on whether agents perceive it to be persistent or transitory. If perceived to be transitory, rational economic agents will save the bulk of the temporary income gains. However, if agents perceive the shock to be permanent, income gains will almost immediately and entirely be spent. Hence, at any given point, the trade account adjustment will reflect either the dominance of the consumption smoothing effect over the investment effect or vice versa (Kent and Cashin 2003).
References
Aghion, P., Bacchetta, P., and Banerjee, A. 2001. Currency Crises and Monetary Policy in a Credit-Constrained Economy. European Economic Review, 45, 1121–50.
Aghion, P., Bacchetta, P., and Banerjee, A. 2003. A Corporate Balance-Sheet Approach to Currency Crises. Journal of Economic Theory, 119, 6–30.
Avdjiev, S., Bruno, V., Koch, C., and Shin, H.S. 2018. The Dollar Exchange Rate as a Global Risk Factor: Evidence from Investment. BIS Working Papers No. 695.
Bebczuk, R., Galindo, A.J., and Panizza, U. 2007. An Evaluation of the Contractionary Devaluation Hypothesis. Working Paper 582, Inter-American Development Bank.
Blecker, R.A., and Razmi, A. 2007. The Fallacy of Composition and Contractionary Devaluations: Output Effects of Real Exchange Rate Shocks in Semi-Industrialised Countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 83–109.
Bruno, V., Kim, Se-Jik and Shin, H.S. 2018. Exchange Rates and the Working Capital Channel of Trade Fluctuations. BIS Working Papers No. 694.
Bruno, V., and Shin, H.S. 2015. Capital Flows and the Risk-Taking Channel of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 71, 119–32.
Bruno, V., and Shin, H.S. 2016. Cross-Border Banking and Global Liquidity. Review of Economic Studies, 82(2), 535–64.
Céspedes, L.F., Chang, R., and Velasco, A. 2004. Balance Sheets and Exchange Rate Policy. American Economic Review, 94, 1183–93.
Connolly, E., and Orsmond, D. 2011. The Mining Industry: From Bust to Boom. Discussion Paper 2011-08, Research Reserve Bank of Australia.
Fornero, J., and Kirchner, M. 2014. Learning About Commodity Cycles and Savings-Investment Dynamics in a Commodity Exporting Economy. Working Papers Central Bank of Chile WP 727.
Galindo, A., Panizza, U., and Schiantarelli, F. 2003. Debt Composition and Balance Sheet Effects of Currency Depreciation: A Summary of the Micro Evidence. Emerging Markets Review, 4, 330–39.
Janot, M.M., Garcia, M.G.P., and Novaes, W. 2008. Balance Sheet Effects in Currency Crises: Evidence from Brazil. Working Paper 162, Banco Central do Brasil.
Kearns, J., and Patel, N. 2016. Does the Financial Channel of Exchange Rates Offset the Trade Channel? BIS Quarterly Review.
Kent, C. 1997. The Response of the Current Account to Terms of Trade Shocks: A Panel-data Study. Reserve Bank of Australia RBA Discussion Papers RDP 9705.
Kent, C., and Cashin, P. 2003. The Response of the Current Account to Terms of Trade Shocks: Persistence Matters. IMF Working Paper No WP/03/143.
Kilian, L., and Vigfusson, R.J. 2009. Pitfalls in Estimating Asymmetric Effects of Energy Price Shocks. CEPR Working Paper 7284.
Kilian, L., and Vigfusson, R.J. 2011. Are Responses of the U.S. Economy Asymmetric in Energy Price Increases and Decreases? Quantitative Economics, 2, 419–53.
Kohler, K. 2016. Currency Devaluations, Aggregate Demand, and Debt Dynamics in an Economy with Foreign Currency Liabilities. Working Paper No. 78, Institute for International Political Economy Berlin.
Krugman, P. 1999. Balance Sheets, the Transfer Problem, and Financial Crises. International Tax and Public Finance, 6, 459–72.
Luc Eyraud, L. 2015. End of the Super-cycle and Growth of Commodity Producers: The Case of Chile. IMF Working Paper WP/15/242.
Mohammad, A. 2017. Labor Market Adjustment to Shocks in Australia. IMF Working Paper WP/17/124.
Ndou, E., and Gumata, N. 2017. Inflation Dynamics in South Africa: The Role of Thresholds, Exchange Rate Pass-through and Inflation Expectations on Policy Trade-offs. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-319-46701-6.
Rey, H. 2015. Dilemma Not Trilemma: The Global Financial Cycle and Monetary Policy Independence. NBER Working Paper No. 21162.
Serena, J.M., and Sousa, R. 2018. Does Exchange Rate Depreciation have Contractionary Effects on Firm-level Investment? The Implications of Alternative Types of Bond Financing. European Stability Mechanism Working Paper Series No. 26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gumata, N., Ndou, E. (2019). The Role of the Exchange Rate on Investment Growth in the Mining Sector: Evidence from the Balance Sheet Hypothesis. In: Accelerated Land Reform, Mining, Growth, Unemployment and Inequality in South Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30884-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30884-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30883-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30884-1
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)