Abstract
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique developed in the 1980s [1] used for the identification, localization, and determination of the presence or absence of specific nucleotide sequences. The technique takes advantage of the inherent ability of complementary strands of DNA or RNA from different sources to hybridize. In situ hybridization is based on the principle of annealing a labeled nucleic acid probe to complementary sequences within cells or tissue mounted (in situ) on a microscope slide. “Fluorescence” refers to the ability to emit light from a reaction within the emitter that renders the visualization of the probe under the microscope possible. Among its advantages in comparison to conventional cytogenetic techniques that require live mitotic cells is its ability to be applied to all nucleated cells or tissues given that the target nucleic acid is not degraded, can be mounted on a slide, and is accessible to the probe. It is a molecular based assay, and therefore is highly sensitive and specific, with a speedy assay time. FISH on nuclear DNA is a powerful tool in the identification of chromosome aneuploidies, segmental gains or losses of chromosomes, rearrangements, gene fusions, and gene amplifications. It can also be applied for the characterization of the highly rearranged chromosomes often present in karyotypes of cancerous cells.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Langer-Safer PR, Levine M, Ward DC. Immunological method for mapping genes on Drosophila polytene chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1982;79(14):4381.
Urrutia R, McNiven MA, Kachar B. Synthesis of RNA probes by the direct in vitro transcription of PCR-generated DNA templates. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 1993;26(2–3):113–20.
Akam ME. The location of Ultrabithorax transcripts in Drosophila tissue sections. EMBO J. 1983;2:2075–84.
Hannon K, Johnstone E, Craft LS, et al. Synthesis of PCR-derived, single-stranded DNA probes suitable for in situ hybridization. Anal Biochem. 1993;212(2):421–7.
Rigby PW, Dieckmann M, Rhodes C, et al. Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J Mol Biol. 1977;113(1):237–51.
Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Ann Biochem. 1983;132:6–13.
Mullis KB. Process for amplifying nucleic acid sequences. U.S. Patent 1985;4,683,202.
Eltoum I, Fredenburgh J, Myers RB, et al. Introduction to the theory and practice of fixation of tissues. J Histotechnol. 2001;24:173–90.
Eltoum I, Fredenburgh J, Grizzle WE. Advanced concepts in fixation: 1. Effects of fixation on immunohistochemistry, reversibility of fixation and recovery of proteins, nucleic acids, and other molecules from fixed and processed tissues. 2. Developmental methods of fixation. J Histotechnol. 2001;24:201–10.
Kearney L. Molecular cytogenetics. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2001;14:645–68.
Ried T, Schröck E, Ning Y, et al. Chromosome painting: a useful art. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:1619–26.
Speicher MR, Ballard SG, Ward DC. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-color FISH. Nat Gen. 1996;12:368–75.
Schröck E, du Manoir S, Veldman T, et al. Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science. 1996;273:494–7.
Speicher MR, Carter NP. The new cytogenetics: blurring the boundaries with molecular biology. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:782–92.
Bishop R. Applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in detecting genetic aberrations of medical significance. Bioscience Horizons. 2010;3(1):85–95.
Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization: a powerful new method for cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science. 1992;258:818–21.
Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar S, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation in breast cancer using comparative genomic hybridization to DNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1998;20:207–11.
Tibiletti MG. Interphase FISH as a new tool in tumor pathology. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;118:229–36.
Sreekantaiah C. FISH panels for hematologic malignancies. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;118:284–96.
Kolialexi A, Tsangaris GTH, Kitsiou S, et al. Impact of cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic studies on hematologic malignancies. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:2979–84.
Dorritie K, Montagna C, Difilippantonio MJ, et al. Advanced molecular cytogenetics in human and mouse. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004;4(5):663–76.
Patel AS, Hawkins AL, Constance A, et al. Cytogenetics and cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2000;12:62–7.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Kariminejad-Najmabadi Pathology and Genetics Center for providing us with the images, and we appreciate greatly the efforts of our colleague Dr. Siavash Ghaderi-Sohi who was responsible for the evaluation and the imaging of many of these specimens.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karimi-Nejhad, R., Ghanadan, A. (2020). Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization: Methods and Application in Cancer Diagnosis. In: Rezaei, N. (eds) Cancer Immunology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30845-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30845-2_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30844-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30845-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)