Skip to main content

Introduction: Joint Ownership in Euro-Mediterranean Relations—Why It Matters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Joint Ownership in EU-Tunisia Relations

Part of the book series: The European Union in International Affairs ((EUIA))

  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

Over the course of two decades, the task of making sense of Euro-Mediterranean relations has become ever more complex. On the one hand, the political and economic crises in Europe and the uprisings in Southern Mediterranean countries have entailed power reconfigurations at different levels. One of the key principles threading its way through the EU responses to these challenges over time has been that of joint ownership. Joint ownership is not easy to define nor to grasp and assess. It is a dynamic concept that might not be directly observable. Moreover, there are many potential policy owners. The chapter describes how joint ownership has been analysed, how it shed light on different aspects of power, asymmetry and cooperation in the global arena and how it can provide new insights into EU–Tunisia relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    EU documents alternate joint ownership and co-ownership in their official documents. I will use primarily joint ownership throughout the book, unless I refer more generally to ownership by one actor (Tunisia or the EU).

  2. 2.

    Tunisia in the Ottoman period was ruled by Beys, officials in charge of controlling specific regions (the Beylic) on behalf of the Sultan.

References

  • Aliboni, R., Tayie, S. M., Rummel, R., Qatarneh, Y., Herolf, G. (2006). Ownership and Co-ownership in Conflict Prevention in the Framework of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (Euromesco Paper No. 54).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, M. D., & Schneider, G. (2000). Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration. European Journal of Political Research, 38(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attinà, F. (2003). The Euro-Mediterranean Partnership Assessed: The Realist and Liberal Views. European Foreign Affairs Review, 8(2), 181–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbé, E., & Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2013). The Challenge of Differentiation in Euro-Mediterranean Relations: Flexible Regional Cooperation or Fragmentation. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (2007). Legitimacy Dilemmas: The IMF’s Pursuit of Country Ownership. Third World Quarterly, 28(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701192231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicchi, F. (2006). ‘Our Size Fits All’: Normative Power Europe and the Mediterranean. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicchi, F. (2010). The Impact of the ENP on EU–North Africa Relations: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. In S. Wolff & R. Whitman (Eds.), The European Neighbourhood Policy in Perspective (pp. 206–222). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, G., & Willett, T. (2004). IMF Conditionality, Implementation and the New Political Economy of Ownership. Comparative Economic Studies, 46(3), 423–450. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. (2011). When Europe Hits … Beyond Its Borders: Europeanization and the Near Abroad. Comparative European Politics, 9(4), 394–413. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2011.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, J. M., & Mourmouras, A. (2002). Is Policy Ownership an Operational Concept? (International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 2-72). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/Is-Policy-Ownership-An-Operational-Concept-15746.

  • Bourguiba, H. (1965). The Tunisian Way. Foreign Affairs, 44, 480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. (Ed.). (1994). Partnership in Practice. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2008). Better Aid, Less Ownership: Multi-annual Programming and the EU’s Development Strategies in Africa. Journal of International Development, 20(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casier, T. (2011). To Adopt or Not to Adopt: Explaining Selective Rule Transfer Under the European Neighbourhood Policy. Journal of European Integration, 33(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.526709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassarino, J.-P. (1999). The EU–Tunisian Association Agreement and Tunisia’s Structural Reform Program. The Middle East Journal, 53(1), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavatorta, F., & Haugbølle, R. H. (2012). The End of Authoritarian Rule and the Mythology of Tunisia Under Ben Ali. Mediterranean Politics, 17(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2012.694043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavatorta, F., & Merone, F. (2013). Political and Social Assessment of Tunisia Pre and Post the ‘Arab Spring’. In R. Di Peri & R. Giordana (Eds.), Revolution Without Revolutions? The Challenges of Tourism Sector in Tunisia (pp. 27–68). Bologna: I libri di Emil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesterman, S. (2007). Ownership in Theory and in Practice: Transfer of Authority in UN Statebuilding Operations (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 969559). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Sarto, R. A. (2015). Borders, Power and Interdependence: A Borderlands Approach to Israel–Palestine and the European Union. In R. A. Del Sarto (Ed.), Fragmented Borders, Interdependence and External Relations: The Israel-Palestine-European Union Triangle (pp. 3–23). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137504142_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Del Sarto, R. A., & Schumacher, T. (2005). From EMP to ENP: What’s at Stake with the European Neighbourhood Policy Towards the Southern Mediterranean? European Foreign Affairs Review, 10, 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Peri, R., & Giordana, R. (Eds.). (2013). Revolution Without Revolutions? The Challenges of Tourism Sector in Tunisia. Bologna: I libri di Emil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (2002). Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach. IMF Staff Papers, 49(Special issue), 36–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2010). Choosing a Bargaining Strategy in EU Negotiations: Power, Preferences, and Culture. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003748666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dür, A., Mateo, G., & Thomas, D. C. (2010). Negotiation Theory and the EU: The State of the Art. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 613–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003748500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, O. (2007). Outsiders’ Perceptions of the European Union in International Trade Negotiations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00755.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgström, O., & Smith, M. (2000). Introduction: Negotiation and Policy-Making in the European Union—Processes, System and Order. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(5), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760010014894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Qadim, N. (2018). The Symbolic Meaning of International Mobility: EU–Morocco Negotiations on Visa Facilitation. Migration Studies, 6(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnx048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Wider Europe-Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with Our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. Available online: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/enp/pdf/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2019.

  • European Commission. (2004a). European Neighbourhood Policy Strategy Paper (COM[2004] 373 Final). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/2004_communication_from_the_commission_-_european_neighbourhood_policy_-_strategy_paper.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2019.

  • European Commission. (2004b). Proposal for a Council Decision on the Position to Be Adopted by the European Community and Its Member States Within the Association Council Established by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement Establishing an Association Between the European Communities and Their Member States, of the One Part, and the Republic of Tunisia, of the Other Part, with Regards to the Adoption of a Recommendation on the Implementation of the EU–Tunisia Action Plan. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/prelex/detail_dossier_real.cfm?CL=en&DosId=192240. Accessed 23 June 2019.

  • Finnemore, M. (1996). Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism. International Organization, 50(02), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, I. (2017). EU Neighbourhood Policy in the Maghreb: Implementing the ENP in Tunisia and Morocco Before and After the Arab Uprisings. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimaud, N. (1995). La spécificité Tunisienne en question. Politique Étrangère, 60(2), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.3406/polit.1995.4417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, S. (2015). European Democracy Promotion in Crisis: Conflicts of Objectives, Neglected External–Domestic Interactions and the Authoritarian Backlash. Global Policy, 6(S1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibou, B. (1999, December). Les marges de manœuvre d’un ‘bon élève’ économique: La Tunisie de Ben Ali. Etudes Du CERI, 60, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibou, B. (2011). The Force of Obedience. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, P. (2005). Partnership Lost? The EU’s Mediterranean Aid Programmes. Mediterranean Politics, 10(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362939042000338827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Nogués, E. (2011). The UfM’s Institutional Structure: Making Inroads Towards ‘Co-ownership’? Mediterranean Politics, 16(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2011.547369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuleers, F., Fonck, D., & Keukeleire, S. (2016). Beyond EU Navel-Gazing: Taking Stock of EU-Centrism in the Analysis of EU Foreign Policy. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716631777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremenyuk, V. A. (Ed.). (2013). International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle, P. R., & McCool, S. (2005). Exploring the Concept of ‘Ownership’ in Natural Resource Planning. Society & Natural Resources, 18(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590908141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbougueng, V. (1999). Ben Ali et le modèle tunisien. Paris: Ed. de l’Orient.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, S. (2005). Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narten, J. (2008). Dilemmas of Promoting Local Ownership: The Case of Postwar Kosovo. In R. Paris and T. D. Sisk (Eds.), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (pp. 252–283). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onar, N. F., & Nicolaïdis, K. (2013). The Decentring Agenda: Europe as a Post-colonial Power. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713485384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, K. (2014). A History of Modern Tunisia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, F. R. (2012). Power in International Negotiations: Symmetry and Asymmetry. Négociations, 16(2), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.3917/neg.016.0039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reslow, N., & Vink, M. (2015). Three-Level Games in EU External Migration Policy: Negotiating Mobility Partnerships in West Africa. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2005a, March 31–April 2). European Neighborhood Policy: Political Conditionality and Its Impact on Democracy in Non-candidate Neighboring Countries. Unpublished Conference Paper Presented at the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Biennial Conference, Austin, TX. Available online: http://aei.pitt.edu/3302/. Accessed 23 June 2019.

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2005b). Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Organization, 59(4), 827–860. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050290.

  • Schumacher, T. (2017). The European Neighbourhood Policy: The Challenge of Demarcating a Complex and Contested Field of Study. In T. Schumacher, A. Marchetti, & T. Demmelhuber (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy (pp. 3–13). Oxon and New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, U. (2008). The European Neighbourhood Policy: A Comment on Theory and Policy. In K. Weber, M. Smith, & M. Baun (Eds.), Governing Europe’s Neighbourhood: Partners or Periphery? (pp. 195–208). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauner, F., & Wolff, S. (2014). The Negotiation and Contestation of EU Migration Policy Instruments: A Research Framework. European Journal of Migration and Law, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-00002046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulmets, E. (2005). The Introduction of the Open Method of Coordination in the European Enlargement Policy: Analysing the Impact of the New PHARE/Twinning Instrument. European Political Economy Review, 3(Spring), 54–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulmets, E. (2006). Adapting the Experience of Enlargement to the Neighbourhood Policy: The ENP as a Substitute to Enlargement? In P. Kratochvil (Ed.), The European Union and Its Neighbourhood: Policies, Problems and Priorities (pp. 29–57). Prague: Institute of International Relations. http://www.dokumenty-iir.cz/Publikace/The_EU_and_its_Neighbourhood.pdf.

  • Van Hüllen, V. (2012). Europeanisation Through Cooperation? EU Democracy Promotion in Morocco and Tunisia. West European Politics, 35(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, S. (2014). The Politics of Negotiating EU Readmission Agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey. European Journal of Migration and Law, 16(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-00002046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, I. W., & Rubin, J. Z. (2004). Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Zardo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zardo, F. (2020). Introduction: Joint Ownership in Euro-Mediterranean Relations—Why It Matters. In: Joint Ownership in EU-Tunisia Relations. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30799-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics