Skip to main content

Introduction: Reading Hobbes as a Theorist of Anarchy and Authority

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hobbesian Internationalism

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

  • 279 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the central thesis of the book: that Hobbes is best read as a theorist of authority (right to rule) and anarchy (‘state of nature’). Anarchy is shown to be the grounding mechanism for the state in Hobbes’s political philosophy. This differentiates Hobbes’s position from that of contemporary political philosophers who justify the state by appealing to moral principles. The chapter warns against reductionist readings of Hobbes’s concept of a state of nature, associated with the image of a ‘war of all against all’. It specifies the interpretive methodology used (analytical hermeneutics). Finally, and crucially, it shows how Hobbes’s political philosophy, augmented with Kantian premises, can be developed into a theory of international relations termed Hobbesian internationalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Armitage, David. 2006. Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International Thought. In Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. A. Brett and J. Tully, 219–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, David. 1990. Inter-Community and International Relations in the Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Polity 23 (2): 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, David. 2018. Appropriating Hobbes: Legacies in Political, Legal and International Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Hedley. 1981. Hobbes and the International Anarchy. Social Research 48 (4): 717–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christov, Theodore. 2015. Before Anarchy: Hobbes and His Critics in Modern International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson, William A. (ed.). 1999. The Obligation to Obey the Law. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, Daniel (2008). Die Naturzustandstheorie des Thomas Hobbes. Berlin: Walter De Guyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evrigenis, Ioannis D. 2014. Images of Anarchy: The Rhetoric and Science in Hobbes’s State of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, Murray. 1979. Thomas Hobbes and the External Relations of States. British Journal of Inter-National Studies 5 (3): 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gert, Bernard. 2001. Hobbes on Reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3–4): 234–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, Maurice M. 1969. Introduction to the Second Edition. In The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, 2nd ed, ed. Ferdinand Tönnies, v–xxi. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1839. De Corpore [Concerning Body]. Volume I in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. William Molesworth. London: John Bohn (Originally published in 1655).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1949. De Cive or the Citizen, ed. Sterling P. Lamprecht. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts (Originally published in 1651).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1968. Leviathan, ed. C.B. Macpherson. London: Penguin (Originally published in 1651).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1969. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic, 2nd ed., ed. Ferdinand Tönnies. London: Frank Cass (Originally published in 1650).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohfeld, W.N. 1919. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaede, Maximillian. 2018. Thomas Hobbes’s Conception of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1991. Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. In Immanuel Kant, Political Writings, trans. H.B. Nisbet, ed. H. Reiss, 93–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Originally published in 1795).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published in 1797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, Gregory S. 1983. Hobbes’s War of All Against All. Ethics 93 (2): 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Sharon A. (ed.). 2012. Hobbes Today: Insights for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Sharon A. (ed.). 2013. The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Sharon A. (ed.). 2019. Interpreting Hobbes’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 1980. Second Treatise of Government, ed. C.B. Macpherson. Indianapolis: Hackett. Originally published in 1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Noel. 2002. Hobbes’s Theory of International Relations. In Aspects of Hobbes, ed. Noel Malcolm, 432–456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martinich, A.P. 2015. Leo Strauss’s Olympian Interpretation: Right, Self-preservation, and Law in the Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. In Reading Between the Lines: Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Winfried Schroeder, 77–98. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeilly, F.S. 1968. The Anatomy of Leviathan. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1946. Introduction to Leviathan. In Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (1960), ed. Michael Oakeshott, vii–lxvi. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1975a. Introduction to Leviathan. In Hobbes on Civil Association, ed. Michael Oakeshott, 1–79. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1975b. The Moral Life in the Writings of Thomas Hobbes. In Hobbes on Civil Association, ed. Michael Oakeshott, 80–140. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1975c. On Human Conduct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokhovnik, Raia, and Gabriella Slomp (eds.). 2010. International Political Theory After Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation and Orientation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D.D. 2004. Hobbes: Morals and Politics, 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, Joseph (ed.). 1990. Authority. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1987. On the Social Contract, trans. Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett (Originally published in 1762).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtz, David. 1996. Justifying the State. In For and Against the State, ed. John T. Sanders and Jan Narveson, 81–97. Rowman and Littlefield: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, A. John. 1995. On the Edge of Anarchy: Locke, Consent, and the Limits of Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, Gabriella. 2011. The Politics of Motion and the Motion of Politics. In International Political Theory After Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation and Orientation, ed. Raia Prokhovnik and Gabriella Slomp, 19–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, Tom (ed.). 1996. The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, Tom, and Luc Foisneau (eds.). 2004. Leviathan After 350 Years. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springborg, Patricia (ed.). 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Leo. 1963. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrender, Howard. 1957. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J.W.N. 1965. Hobbes System of Ideas. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, Martin. 1991. International Theory: The Three Traditions, eds. Gabriele Wight and Brian Porter. Leicester: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Robert Paul. 1970. In Defense of Anarchism. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silviya Lechner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lechner, S. (2019). Introduction: Reading Hobbes as a Theorist of Anarchy and Authority. In: Hobbesian Internationalism. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30693-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics