Skip to main content

Machine Learning and Dynamic Whole Body Control for Underwater Manipulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1324 Accesses

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 96))

Abstract

Autonomous underwater manipulation is nowadays still an open research challenge. This paper describes the approaches to tackle some of the open challenges. On the one side, the use of machine learning techniques for the online identification and adaption of vehicle dynamics (dealing with drift compensation, mass changes, etc.) as well as the use of high-level context-based configuration of controllers to adapt to changes in system morphology, hardware, and/or tasks. On the other side, a robust control of underwater manipulators based on an extension of whole-body control techniques is envisaged which takes into account the heterogeneous actuation (thrusters on the base, actuators on the arm joints) as well as the uncertain underwater vehicle dynamics. The result is a highly-reconfigurable system that can automatically adapt its behavior to cope with changes in the environment, in its own morphology and/or in the task goals. The outcomes are planned to be validated in two different scenarios: a floating-base dynamics testbed originating from space applications and aerial robots at DLR and an underwater pool at DFKI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Antonelli G (2006) Underwater robots: motion and force control of vehicle-manipulator systems. Springer tracts in advanced robotics, vol 2

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bargsten V, de Gea Fernández J, Kassahun Y (2016) Experimental robot inverse dynamics identification using classical and machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of ISR 2016: 47st international symposium on robotics, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel C, Kroemer O, Viering M, Metz J, Peters J (2015) Active reward learning with a novel acquisition function. Auton Robots 39(3):389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Gea Fernández J, Mronga D, Günther M, Knobloch T, Wirkus M, Schröer M, Trampler M, Stiene S, Kirchner E, Bargsten V, Bänziger T, Teiwes J, Krüger T, Kirchner F (2017) Multimodal sensor–based whole–body control for human–robot collaboration in industrial settings. Robot Auton Syst 94(Supplement C):102 – 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietrich A, Bussmann K, Petit F, Kotyczka P, Ott C, Lohmann B, Albu-Schäffer A (2015) Whole-body impedance control of wheeled mobile manipulators: stability analysis and experiments on the humanoid robot rollin’ justin. Auton Robots

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fossen TI (2002) Marine control systems: guidance, navigation and control of ships, rigs and underwater vehicles

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garofalo G, Henze B, Englsberger J, Ott C (2015) On the inertially decoupled structure of the floating base robot dynamics. In: Proceedings of 8th vienna international conference on mathematical modelling (MATHMOD), pp 322–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giordano AM, Garofalo G, Stefano MD, Ott C, Albu-Schaeffer A (2016) Dynamics and control of a free-floating space robot in presence of nonzero linear and angular momenta. In: Proceedings of IEEE annual conference on decision and control (CDC), pp 322–327

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanff H, Kloss P, Wehbe B, Kampmann P, Kroffke S, Sander A, Firvida MB, von Einem M, Bode JF, Kirchner F (2017) Auvx—a novel miniaturized autonomous underwater vehicle. In: OCEANS 2017—Aberdeen, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2017.8084946

  10. Henze B, Dietrich A, Ott C (2016) An approach to combine balancing and multi-objective manipulation for legged humanoid robots. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 1(2):700–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim M, Kondak K, Ott C (2018) A stabilizing controller for regulation of uav with manipulator. IEEE Robot Autom Lett (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez-Cantin R, Lopes M, Montesano L (2010) Body schema acquisition through active learning. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 1860–1866. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509406

  13. Nguyen-Tuong D, Peters J (2010) Using model knowledge for learning inverse dynamics. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 2677–2682 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509858

  14. Nguyen-Tuong D, Peters J (2011) Model learning for robot control: a survey. Cognit Process 12(4):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ott C, Dietrich A, Albu-Schäffer A (2015) Prioritized multi-task compliance control of redundant manipulators. Automatica 53:416–423

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Schempf H, Yoerger DR (1992) Coordinated vehicle/manipulation design and control issues for underwater telemanipulation. IFAC Proc 25(3):259–267 (1992). IFAC workshop on artificial intelligence control and advanced technology in marine automation (CAMS ’92), Genova, Italy, April 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sentis L (2007) Synthesis and control of whole-body behaviors in humanoid systems. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simetti E, Casalino G, Torelli S, Sperindé A, Turetta A, Floating underwater manipulation: developed control methodology and experimental validation within the trident project. J Field Robot 31(3):364–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Swevers J, Verdonck W, Schutter JD (2007) Dynamic model identification for industrial robots. IEEE Control Syst Mag 27(5):58–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2007.904659

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wehbe B, Fabisch A, Krell MM (2017) Online model identification for underwater vehicles through incremental support vector regression. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 4173–4180. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2017.8206278

  21. Wehbe B, Hidebrandt M, Kirchner F (2017) Experimental evaluation of various machine learning regression methods for model identification of autonomous underwater vehicles. In: Proceedings of 2017 international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA-17), pp 4885–4890. IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wehbe B, Krell MM (2017) Learning coupled dynamic models of underwater vehicles using support vector regression. In: OCEANS 2017—Aberdeen, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2017.8084596

  23. Yoerger DR, Schempf H, Dipietro DM, Design and performance evaluation of an actively compliant underwater manipulator for full-ocean depth. J Robot Syst 8(3):371–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.4620080306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu B, de Gea Fernández J, Kassahun Y, Bargsten V (2017) Learning the elasticity of a series-elastic actuator for accurate torque control. In: Benferhat S, Tabia K, Ali M (eds) advances in artificial intelligence: from theory to practice: 30th international conference on industrial engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems, IEA/AIE 2017, Arras, France, June 27–30, 2017, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 543–552. Springer International Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yuh J (2000) Design and control of autonomous underwater robots: a survey. Auton Robot 8(1):7–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008984701078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuh J, Choi SK, Ikehara C, Kim GH, McMurty G, Ghasemi-Nejhad M, Sarkar N, Sugihara K (1998) Design of a semi-autonomous underwater vehicle for intervention missions (sauvim). In: Proceedings of 1998 international symposium on underwater technology, pp 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/UT.1998.670059

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José de Gea Fernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Gea Fernández, J., Ott, C., Wehbe, B. (2020). Machine Learning and Dynamic Whole Body Control for Underwater Manipulation. In: Kirchner, F., Straube, S., Kühn, D., Hoyer, N. (eds) AI Technology for Underwater Robots. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 96. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30683-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics