Abstract
This position paper presents initial thoughts on how some techniques from general robotics can help for autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) navigation in confined spaces by exploiting in particular the spatial borders and considering information that is not available in open waters. There are natural confined spaces, e.g. caves, as well as artificial ones, e.g. tripods of off-shore wind turbines or underwater oil-and-gas facilities, which make this application interesting. We argue that the common AUV perceptual system with forward looking camera and/or sonar has deficits for measuring structures in the immediate surrounding of the AUV. This surrounding, however, is particularly important in confined spaces where the AUV cannot be seen as a “point in space” but its physical extension needs to be considered. Distant environment features that are observed in the remote sensors can be mapped, but later, when the AUV comes closer and the remote sensors cannot observe them anymore, they might not be directly usable for localization using these sensors. However, we still see the opportunity to make use of them and, moreover, to generate new features by other means. How this can be achieved is the central idea we want to convey here.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agarwal S, Mierle K et al Ceres solver. http://ceres-solver.org. Accessed 6/2018
Band S, Gissler C, Ihmsen M, Cornelis J, Peer A, Teschner M (2018) Pressure boundaries for implicit incompressible SPH. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 37(2):14
Bar-Shalom Y, Li X, Kirubarajan T (2001) Estimation with applications to tracking and navigation. Wiley
Bryson M, Johnson-Roberson M, Pizarro O, Williams SB (2016) True color correction of autonomous underwater vehicle imagery. J Field Robot 33(6):853–874
Cadena C, Carlone L, Carrillo H, Latif Y, Scaramuzza D, Neira J, Reid I, Leonard JJ (2016) Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: toward the robust-perception age. IEEE Trans Robot 32(6):1309–1332
Campos R, Garcia R, Alliez P, Yvinec M (2015) A surface reconstruction method for in-detail underwater 3d optical mapping. Int J Robot Res 34(1):64–89
Fairfield N, Kantor G, Jonak D, Wettergreen D (2008) DEPTHX autonomy software: Design and field results. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-08-09, Carnegie Mellon University
Fox C, Evans M, Pearson M, Prescott T (2012) Tactile slam with a biomimetic whiskered robot. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 4925–4930
Fuentes-Pacheco J, Ruiz-Ascencio J, Rendón-Mancha JM (2015) Visual simultaneous localization and mapping: a survey. Artif Intell Rev 43(1):55–81
Goodall C, Carmichael S, Scannell B (2013) The battle between MEMS and fogs for precision guidance. Technical report MS-2432, Analog Devices, Inc. http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/tech-articles/The-Battle-Between-MEMS-and-FOGs-for-Precision-Guidance-MS-2432.pdf
Haidacher S, Hirzinger G (2003) Estimating finger contact location and object pose from contact measurements in 3d grasping. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. Proceedings, ICRA’03, vol 2. IEEE, pp 1805–1810
Hertzberg C, Wagner R, Frese U, Schröder L (2013) Integrating generic sensor fusion algorithms with sound state representations through encapsulation of manifolds. Inf Fusion 14(1):57–77
Hidalgo-Carrio J, Babu A, Kirchner F (2014) Static forces weighted Jacobian motion models for improved Odometry. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2014). IEEE, pp 169–175
Hildebrandt M, Gaudig C, Christensen L, Natarajan S, Paranhos P, Albiez J (2012) Two years of experiments with the AUV Dagon-a versatile vehicle for high precision visual mapping and algorithm evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/OES autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), Southampton, UK, pp 24–27
Johnson-Roberson M, Pizarro O, Williams SB, Mahon I (2010) Generation and visualization of large-scale three-dimensional reconstructions from underwater robotic surveys. J Field Robot 27(1):21–51
Kalyan TS, Zadeh PA, Staub-French S, Froese TM (2016) Construction quality assessment using 3d as-built models generated with project tango. Procedia Eng 145:1416–1423
Kollmitz M, Büscher D, Schubert T, Burgard W (2018) Whole-body sensory concept for compliant mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics & automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia. http://ais.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/publications/papers/kollmitz18icra.pdf
Kümmerle R, Grisetti G, Strasdat H, Konolige K, Burgard W (2011) \({\rm G}^{2}{\rm o}\): a general framework for graph optimization. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 3607–3613
Leonard JJ, Bahr A (2016) Autonomous underwater vehicle navigation. In: Springer handbook of ocean engineering (Chapter 14). Springer, pp 341–358
Lewis D (1994) We, the navigators: the ancient art of landfinding in the Pacific. University of Hawaii Press
Mur-Artal R, Montiel JMM, Tardos JD (2015) ORB-SLAM: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system. IEEE Trans Robot 31(5):1147–1163
Newcombe RA, Lovegrove SJ, Davison AJ (2011) DTAM: dense tracking and mapping in real-time. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV). IEEE, pp 2320–2327
Nicosevici T, Gracias N, Negahdaripour S, Garcia R (2009) Efficient three-dimensional scene modeling and mosaicing. J Field Robot 26(10):759–788
Nortek group: New to subsea navigation? https://www.nortekgroup.com/insight/nortek-wiki/new-to-subsea-navigation. Accessed 12 Oct 2018
Pfingsthorn M, Birk A, Buelow H (2012) Uncertainty estimation for a 6-DoF spectral registration method as basis for sonar-based underwater 3d SLAM. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 3049–3054
Pizarro O, Eustice R, Singh H (2004) Large area 3d reconstructions from underwater surveys. In: MTS/IEEE OCEANS conference and exhibition. Citeseer, pp 678–687
Plagemann C, Kersting K, Burgard W (2008) Nonstationary Gaussian process regression using point estimates of local smoothness. In: Proceedings of the European conference on machine learning (ECML), Antwerp, Belgium. http://ais.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/publications/papers/plagemann08ecml.pdf
Schwendner J, Joyeux S, Kirchner F (2014) Using embodied data for localization and mapping. J Field Robot 31(2):263–295
Sonardyne: Syrinx-doppler velocity log specifications. Technical report (2017). https://www.sonardyne.com/product/syrinx-doppler-velocity-log/
Stachniss C, Grisetti G, Burgard W (2005) Information gain-based exploration using rao-blackwellized particle filters. In: Robotics: science and systems, vol 2, pp 65–72
Stolpmann A (2016) Innenraumfußgängerverfolgung mit inertialsensoren und gebäudeplänen. Master’s thesis, Universität Bremen. www.uni-bremen.de
Strasdat H, Stachniss C, Burgard W (2009) Which landmark is useful? learning selection policies for navigation in unknown environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics & automation (ICRA), Kobe, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152207
Whelan T, Salas-Moreno RF, Glocker B, Davison AJ, Leutenegger S (2016) Elasticfusion: real-time dense slam and light source estimation. Int J Robot Res 35(14):1697–1716
Williams SB, Pizarro OR, Jakuba MV, Johnson CR, Barrett NS, Babcock RC, Kendrick GA, Steinberg PD, Heyward AJ, Doherty PJ et al (2012) Monitoring of benthic reference sites: using an autonomous underwater vehicle. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 19(1):73–84
Woodman O, Harle R (2008) Pedestrian localisation for indoor environments. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on ubiquitous computing. ACM, pp 114–123
YSI: i3XO EcoMapper AUV. https://www.ysi.com/ecomapper. Accessed 14 Oct 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frese, U., Büscher, D., Burgard, W. (2020). Novel Directions for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation in Confined Spaces. In: Kirchner, F., Straube, S., Kühn, D., Hoyer, N. (eds) AI Technology for Underwater Robots. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 96. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30683-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30683-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30682-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30683-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)