Skip to main content

Evaluative Aspects in Decision-Making Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 476 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 247))

Abstract

In this work we deal with evaluative aspects in decision-making processes. Evaluative activity, however complex, precedes, accompanies and follows human actions. In fact, the cognitive outcomes which are reached with its progressive development, directs the action by positioning it towards desired directions and goals. The evaluative activity, contrary to what could be thought in a simplistic and practical way, is instead expressed through a series of operations that are distinct but mutually connected, all of great importance. To begin with, think of the attribution of value to facts, data, procedures, events or to some of their qualities in relation to the goals that the evaluator wants to pursue. It may happen that a fact deemed positive or negative in a context and in relation to certain purposes may not be considered as such if we are in the presence of other constraints and in view of other objectives. Therefore, the practice of evaluation, far from being standardizable, more often follows the law of the case by case and it is difficult to harness the attribution of value in rigid and pre-established schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Camagni 1986; Mela 1987; Mazza, 1986.

  2. 2.

    M. Cremaschi, op. cit., p. 112.

  3. 3.

    R. Gubert.

  4. 4.

    A.Petrillo “Current problems and possible solutions”, COMPANY NOTES AND CONFLICT.

    Number 5/1995 URBAN QUESTIONS Southern Italy and Campania from ancient to contemporary—cap V.

  5. 5.

    D.Patassini “Paradigms and strategies for evaluating plans, programs and policies,” Urbanistica, n. 105, December 1995, pp. 50–59.

  6. 6.

    Ibidem.

  7. 7.

    Strategic environmental assessment in spatial planning (La): New perspectives. Corrado Zoppi, Maurizio Garano Gangemi Editore spa.

  8. 8.

    Feedback devices can be: real (they activate organizational behaviors); artificial (simulate situations/ scenarios and use models of the described or explanatory type).

  9. 9.

    Classification introduced by J. Leca “Sur le rôle de la connaissance dans the modernization of the age and the statute of the evaluation”, Revue francaise d'administration publique n. 66, 1993 and taken up again by D. Patassini in note 2 of the cit.

  10. 10.

    Evaluation as a reference for planning—Speciale Ce.S.E.T.—XXXIII Study Meeting Study Center for Estimates and Territorial Economics edited by G. Marchi—University of Cagliari—Department of Land Engineering 2003 page 9.

References

  • Balducci, A., Mantysalo, R. (Eds): Urban Planning As a Trading Zone. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekesiene, S., Hoskova-Mayerova, S.: Decision tree—based classification model for identification of effective leadership indicators in the Lithuania Army Forces. J. Math Fund. Sci. 50(2), 121–141 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaut, C., Hoskova-Mayerova, S., Flaut, D. (eds.): Models and Theories in Social Systems, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 179, Springer International Publishing, 576p (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00084-4

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskova-Mayerova, S., Talhofer, V., Hofmann, A., Kubíček, P.: Mathematical model used in decision-making process with respect to the reliability of geodatabase, advanced dynamic modeling of economic and social systems. Ser.: Stud. Comput. Intell. 448(2013), 143–162 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32903-6_11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskova-Mayerova, S., Maturo, A.: Decision-making process using hyperstructures and fuzzy structures in social sciences. In: Collan, M., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Soft Computing Applications for Group Decision-Making and Consensus Modeling. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 357. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60207-3_7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskova-Mayerova, S., Maturo, F., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.): Mathematical-Statistical Models and Qualitative Theories for Economic and Social Sciences. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 104. Springer, Heidelberg, 442p (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturo, A., Sanseviero, S.: A mathematical model for a complex evaluation and decision process. In: Franchino, R., Maturo, A., Ventre, A.G.S., Violano, A. (eds.) Strategies, Processes and Decision-Making Models for Environmental Management, pp. 228–237. Edizioni Goliardiche, Trieste (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventre, A., Maturo, A., Hoskova-Mayerova, S., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.): Multicriteria and multiagent decision making with applications to economic and social sciences. In: Series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, p. 315. ISSN 1434-9922, ISBN 978-3-642-35634-6. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Serena Sanseviero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Serena Sanseviero, E. (2020). Evaluative Aspects in Decision-Making Processes. In: Flaut, D., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Ispas, C., Maturo, F., Flaut, C. (eds) Decision Making in Social Sciences: Between Traditions and Innovations. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 247. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30659-5_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics