Abstract
Social influence is arguably the most fundament and pervasive social process. The majority of research on this topic adopts the perspective of the source of influence, investigating how the he or she can overcome the resistance or passivity of the target of influence. In this view, social influence is tantamount to control and often involves strategies and tactics of manipulation. This chapter presents Regulatory Theory of Social Influence (RTSI), which examines social influence from the perspective of the target. RTSI holds that rather than always resisting social influence, the target often plays an active role in controlling the influence process. In particular, the target optimizes decision-making and judgment by delegating information processing to potential sources, thereby conserving his or her cognitive resources and improving the quality of his or her decisions and judgments. The interaction of four factors—trust, coherence, issue importance, and own expertise—determine the target’s choice of sources and the level of abstraction in the information sought from these sources. The chapter briefly discusses each factor and their interactive effects on the choice of sources and the level of information that is sought from them. Beyond maximizing the cognitive efficiency of the target and the quality of his or her outcomes, the processes specified by RTSI enhance the functioning of the social group in which the target embedded. The model also has practical applications in various domains, including the design of rules for interaction among AI agents in techno-social groups.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., Sanford, R.N., Aron, B.R., Levinson, M.H., Morrow, W.R.: The authoritarian personality. Norton, New York (1950)
Allport, G.W.: Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (1954)
Apsler, R., Sears, D.O.: Warning, personal involvement, and attitude change. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 9(2p1), 162 (1968)
Arrow, K.J.: The limits of organization. Norton, New York (1974)
Arrow, H., McGrath, J.E., Berdahl, J.L.: Small groups as complex systems: formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Sage, London (2000)
Asch, S.E.: Social psychology. Prentice-Hall, New York (1952)
Asch, S.E.: Opinions and social pressure. Sci. Am. 193(5), 31–35 (1955)
Asch, S.E.: Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 70(9), 1 (1956)
Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)
Barber, B.: The logic and limits of trust. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick (1983)
Baron, R.S., Vandello, J.A., Brunsman, B.: The forgotten variable in conformity research: impact of task importance on social influence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71(5), 915–927 (1996)
Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117(3), 497 (1995)
Bentley, R.A., Ormerod, P., Batty, M.: Evolving social influence in large populations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65(3), 537–546 (2011)
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K.: Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econom. Behav. 10(1), 122–142 (1995)
Bonabeau, E.: Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(Suppl 3), 7280–7287 (2002)
Bourdieu, P.: The forms of capital. In: Halsey, A.H., Lauder, H., Brown, P., et al. (eds.) Education: culture, economy, society, pp. 46–58. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)
Brady, J.V.: Ulcers in “executive” monkeys. Sci. Am. 199(4), 95–103 (1958)
Brehm, J.W.: A theory of psychological reactance. Academic, New York (1966)
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E.: The need for cognition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 42(1), 116 (1982)
Chiles, T.H., McMackin, J.F.: Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21(1), 73–99 (1996)
Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: the Psychology of Persuasion. Morrow, New York (1993)
Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA (2000)
Cook, K.S., Hardin, R., Levi, M.: Cooperation without trust? Russell Sage Foundation Publ, New York (2005)
Craik, F.I., Lockhart, R.S.: Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 11(6), 671–684 (1972)
Cuddy, A.J., Fiske, S.T., Glick, P.: Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: the stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40, 61–149 (2008)
Currall, S.C., Epstein, M.J.: The fragility of organizational trust: lessons from the rise and fall of Enron. Organ. Dyn. 32(2), 193–206 (2003)
Currall, S.C., Inkpen, A.C.: On the complexity of organizational trust: a multi-level co-evolutionary perspective and guidelines for future research. In: Bachmann, R., Zaheer, A. (eds.) Handbook of trust research, pp. 235–246. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2006)
DeBruine, L.M.: Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269(1498), 1307–1312 (2002)
Deluga, R.J.: The relation between trust in the supervisor and subordinate organizational citizenship behavior. Mil. Psychol. 7(1), 1–16 (1995)
Deutsch, M.: Trust and suspicion. J. Confl. Resolut. 2(4), 265–279 (1958)
Deutsch, M.: Cooperation and trust: some theoretical notes. Nebraska symposium on motivation, pp. 275–320. Nebraska University Press, Lincoln (1962)
Dimoka, A.: What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Q. 34(2), 373–396 (2010)
Dodgson, M.: Learning, trust, and technological collaboration. Hum. Relat. 46(1), 77–95 (1993)
Earle, T.C.: Trust in risk management: a model-based review of empirical research. Risk Anal. 30(4), 541–574 (2010)
Ekeh, P.P.: Social exchange theory: the two traditions. Haward University Press, Cambridge, MA (1974)
Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, vol. 2. Stanford University Press (1962)
Fine, B.J.: Conclusion-drawing, communicator credibility, and anxiety as factors in opinion change. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 54, 369–374 (1957)
Fiske, S.T., Taylor, S.E.: Social cognition. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1991)
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J., Glick, P.: Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11(2), 77–83 (2007)
French, J.R., Raven, B., Cartwright, D.: The bases of social power. Classics Organ. Theory. 7, 311–320 (1959)
Fukuyama, F.: Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press Paperbacks, New York (1995)
Gambetta, D.: Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations. Basil Blackwell, New York (1988)
Giardini, F., Quattrociocchi, W., Conte, R.: Understanding opinions. A cognitive and formal account. Advances in Complex Systems (2011)
Glöckner, A., Engel, C.: Can we trust intuitive jurors? Standards of proof and the probative value of evidence in coherence-based reasoning. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 10(2), 230–252 (2013)
Gorn, G.J.: The effects of personal involvement, communication discrepancy, and source prestige on reactions to communications on separatism. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 7, 369–386 (1975)
Gouldner, A.W.: The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 161–178 (1960)
Grzelak, J.Ł., Nowak, A.: Wpływ społeczny. In: Strelau, J. (ed.) Psychologia Podręcznik Akademicki, vol. 3, pp. 187–205 (2000)
Guastello, S.J., Koopmans, M., Pincus, D. (eds.): Chaos and complexity in psychology: the theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)
Hayashi, Y., Kryssanov, V.: An empirical investigation of similarity-driven trust dynamics in social networks. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 79, 27–37 (2013)
Heesacker, M., Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Field dependence and attitude change: source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. J. Pers. 51(4), 653–666 (1983)
Horne, B.D., Adali, S..: This just in: fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. In Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2017)
Janis, I.L.: Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, p. 349. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1982)
Johnson, S.: Emergence: the connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software. Simon and Schuster, New York (2001)
Johnson, N.: Simply complexity: a clear guide to complexity theory. Oneworld Publications, Oxford (2009)
Johnson-George, C., Swap, W.C.: Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43(6), 1306 (1982)
Johnston, W.A., Dark, V.J., Jacoby, L.L.: Perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11(1), 3 (1985)
Konovsky, M.A., Pugh, S.D.: Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Acad. Manag. J. 37(3), 656–669 (1994)
Kramer, R.M., Tyler, T.R.: Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)
Krosnick, J.A.: Attitude importance and attitude change. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24, 240–255 (1988)
Kruglanski, A.W.: Motivated social cognition: principles of the interface. (1996)
Kruglanski, A.W., Freund, T.: The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19(5), 448–468 (1983)
Kruglanski, A.W., Thompson, E.P.: Persuasion by a single route: a view from the unimodel. Psychol. Inq. 10(2), 83–109 (1999)
Kruglanski, A.W., Webster, D.M.: Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychol. Rev. 103(2), 263 (1996)
Kunda, Z., Thagard, P.: Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: a parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychol. Rev. 103(2), 284 (1996)
Landrum, A.R., Mills, C.M., Johnston, A.M.: When do children trust the expert? Benevolence information influences children’s trust more than expertise. Dev. Sci. 16(4), 622–638 (2013)
Latané, B., Nowak, A.: Attitudes as catastrophes: from dimensions to categories with increasing involvement. In: Dynamical systems in social psychology, pp. 219–249. Academic, San Diego (1994)
Lewicka, M., Czapiński, J., Peeters, G.: Positive-negative asymmetry or ‘When the heart needs a reason’. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 22(5), 425–434 (1992)
Lewicki, R.J., Bunker, B.B.: Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In: Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research, pp. 114–139. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)
Lewicki, R., McAllister, D.J., Bies, R.: Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 438–458 (1998)
Li, P.P.: Towards an interdisciplinary conceptualization of trust: a typological approach. Manag. Organ. Rev. 3(3), 421–445 (2007)
Liberman, N., Trope, Y.: The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science. 322(5905), 1201–1205 (2008)
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., Stephan, E.: Psychological distance. In: Social psychology: handbook of basic principles, 2, pp. 353-383 (2007)
Maddux, J.E., Rogers, R.W.: Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: a case of brains over beauty. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39(2), 235 (1980)
Mason, M., Hood, B., Macrae, C.N.: Look into my eyes: gaze direction and person memory. Memory. 12(5), 637–643 (2004)
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)
McEvily, B., Tortoriello, M.: Measuring trust in organisational research: review and recommendations. J. Trust Res. 1(1), 23–63 (2011)
McGuire, W.J.: Attitudes and attitude change. In: The handbook of social psychology, pp. 233–346. Random House, New York (1985)
McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., Chervany, N.L.: Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 473–490 (1998)
McKnight, D.H., Chervany, N.: While trust is cool and collected, distrust is fiery and frenzied: a model of distrust concepts. In AMCIS Proceedings, pp.883–888. (2001)
McKnight, D.H., Kacmar, C.J., Choudhury, V.: Dispositional trust and distrust distinctions in predicting high and low-risk internet expert advice site perceptions. e-Service J. 3(2), 35–58 (2004)
Milgram, S.: Obedience to authority. Harper & Row, New York (1974)
Misztal, B.: Trust in modern societies: the search for the bases of social order. Polity Press, Cambridge (1998)
Mitchell, R., Nicholas, S.: Knowledge creation in groups: the value of cognitive diversity, transactive memory and open-mindedness norms. Electron. J. Knowl. Manag. 4(1), 67–74 (2006)
Myers, D.G., Lamm, H.: The group polarization phenomenon. Psychol. Bull. 83(4), 602 (1976)
Nowak, A.: Dynamical minimalism: why less is more in psychology. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8(2), 183–192 (2004)
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R.R.: Dynamical social psychology, vol. 647. Guilford Press, New York (1998)
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., Latané, B.: From private attitude to public opinion: a dynamic theory of social impact. Psychol. Rev. 97(3), 362 (1990)
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R.R., Tesser, A., Borkowski, W.: Society of self: the emergence of collective properties in self-structure. Psychol. Rev. 17, 39–61 (2000)
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R.R., Miller, M.E.: Social influence and group dynamics. Handb. Psychol. 383–417 (2003)
Nowak, A., Winkowska-Nowak, K., Brée, D. (eds.): Complex human dynamics: from mind to societies. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2013)
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R.R., Zochowski, M., Rychwalska, A.: Functional synchronization: the emergence of coordinated activity in human systems. Front. Psychol. 8, 945 (2017)
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., Rychwalska, A., Zochowski, M.: In Sync: the emergence of function in minds, groups, and societies. Springer (in press)
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., Rychwalska, A., Zochowski, M.: In Sync: the emergence of function in minds, groups, and societies. Springer (2020)
Ormerod, P.: The economics of radical uncertainty (No. 2015-40). Economics Discussion Papers (2015)
Parks, C.D., Henager, R.F., Scamahorn, S.D.: Trust and reactions to messages of intent in social dilemmas. J. Confl. Resolut. 40(1), 134–151 (1996)
Peeters, G., Czapiński, J.: Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: the distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 1(1), 33–60 (1990)
Pennington, N., Hastie, R.: Explaining the evidence: tests of the story model for juror decision making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62(2), 189 (1992)
Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G.: Lazy, not biased: susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 188, 39–50 (2019)
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Communication and persuasion, pp. 1–24. Springer, New York (1986)
Putnam, R.D.: The prosperous community. Am. Prospect. 4(13), 35–42 (1993)
PytlikZillig, L.M., Hamm, J.A., Shockley, E., Herian, M.N., Neal, T.M., Kimbrough, C.D., Tomkins, A.J., Bornstein, B.H.: The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional domains: results from confirmatory factor analyses. J. Trust Res. 6(2), 111–150 (2016)
Reber, R., Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N.: Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychol. Sci. 9(1), 45–48 (1998)
Reeder, G.D., Brewer, M.B.: A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychol. Rev. 86(1), 61 (1979)
Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M.A., McCarthy, J.D.: Do people trust their eyes more than their ears? Media bias while seeking expert advice. In Proceedings of CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in Computing System. pp. 1745–1748 (2005)
Rokeach, M.: Political and religious dogmatism: an alternative to the authoritarian personality. Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl. 70(18), 1 (1956)
Ross, L., Lepper, M.R., Hubbard, M.: Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32(5), 880 (1975)
Roszczyńska-Kurasińska, M., Kacprzyk-Murawska, M.: The dynamics of trust from the perspective of a trust game. In: Nowak, A., Winkowska-Nowak, K., Bree, D. (eds.) Complex human dynamics, pp. 191–207. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2013)
Rotter, J.B.: Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Am. Psychol. 26(5), 443 (1971)
Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 393–404 (1998)
Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H.: An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(2), 344–354 (2007)
Schuman, H., Presser, S.: Questions and answers: experiments on question form, wording, and context in attitude surveys. Academic, New York (1981)
Sherif, C.W., Sherif, M., Nebergall, R.E.: Attitude and attitude change: the social judgement-involvement process. Saunders, Philadelphia/London (1965)
Simon, H.A.: Bounded rationality in social science: today and tomorrow. Mind & Society. 1(1), 25–39 (2000)
Simon, D., Holyoak, K.J.: Structural dynamics of cognition: from consistency theories to constraint satisfaction. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6(4), 283–294 (2002)
Sitkin, S.B., Roth, N.L.: Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. 4(3), 367–392 (1993)
Stephan, E., Liberman, N., Trope, Y.: Politeness and psychological distance: a construal level perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98(2), 268–280 (2010)
Tang, L.R., Jang, S.S., Chiang, L.L.: Website processing fluency: its impacts on information trust, satisfaction, and destination attitude. Tour. Anal. 19(1), 111–116 (2014)
Thagard, P.: Explanatory coherence. Behav. Brain Sci. 12(03), 435–467 (1989)
Thagard, P.: Coherence in thought and action. MIT press, Cambridge (2002)
Thibaut, J.W., Kelley, H.H.: The social psychology of groups. Routledge, London (2017/1959)
Thom, R.: Structural stability and morphogenesis. Benjamin, New York (1975)
Tyler, T.R.: Trust within organisations. Pers. Rev. 32(5), 556–568 (2003)
Uviller, H.R.: Credence, character, and the rules of evidence: seeing through the liar’s tale. Duke Law J. 42, 776–832 (1993)
Vallacher, R.R., Nowak, A. (eds.): Dynamical systems in social psychology. Academic, San Diego (1994)
Vallacher, R.R., Nowak, A.: The dynamics of self-regulation. In: Advances in social cognition, vol. 12, pp. 3–52. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)
Vallacher, R.R., Nowak, A.: Dynamical social psychology: finding order in the flow of human experience. In: Social psychology: handbook of basic principles, vol. 2, pp. 734–758. Guilford Press, New York (2007)
Vallacher, R.R., Wegner, D.M.: A theory of action identification. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1985)
Vallacher, R.R., Wegner, D.M.: What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychol. Rev. 94(1), 3 (1987)
Vallacher, R.R., Read, S.J., Nowak, A.: The dynamical perspective in personality and social psychology. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6(4), 264–273 (2002)
Vallacher, R.R., Read, S.J., Nowak, A. (eds.): Computational Social Psychology. Routledge, New York (2017)
Voci, A.: The link between identification and in-group favouritism: effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 45(2), 265–284 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X52245
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S.: The spread of true and false news online. Science. 359(6380), 1146–1151 (2018)
Wegner, D.M.: Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Mullen, B., Goethals, G.R. (eds.) Theories of group behavior, pp. 185–208, New York. Springer (1987)
Wegner, D.M., Vallacher, R.R.: Implicit psychology: an introduction to social cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977)
Winkielman, P., Olszanowski, M., Gola, M.: Faces in-between: evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency. Emotion. 15(2), 232 (2015)
Wojciszke, B.: Postawy i ich zmiana. Psychologia. 3, 79–105 (2000)
Wojciszke, B.: Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 16(1), 155–188 (2005)
Wojciszke, B., Baryła, W.: Perspektywa sprawcy i biorcy w spostrzeganiu siebie i innych. Psychol. Społeczna. 1(1), 9–32 (2006)
Wojciszke, B., Bazińska, R., Jaworski, M.: On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24(12), 1251–1263 (1998)
Worchel, P.: Trust and distrust. In: Austin, W.G., Worchel, S. (eds.) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Wadsworth, Belmont (1979)
Yoo, Y., Kanawattanachai, P.: Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 9(2), 187–208 (2001)
Zabłocka, A., Praszkier, R., Petrushak, E., Kacprzyk-Murawska, M.: Measuring the propensity for building social capital depending on ties-strength. J. Posit. Manag. 7(4), 19–39 (2017)
Ziegler, C.N.: On recommender systems. In social web artifacts for boosting recommenders, pp. 11–20. Springer, Cham (2013)
Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., Brewer, M.B., Peng, Y.: Collaboration structure and information dilemmas in biotechnology: organizational boundaries and trust production. In: Kramer, R.M., Tyler, T.R. (eds.) Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research, pp. 90–113. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nowak, A. et al. (2019). Social Influence as Socially Distributed Information Processing. In: Target in Control. SpringerBriefs in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30622-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30622-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30621-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30622-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)