Skip to main content

Risk-Free Bidding in Complement-Free Combinatorial Auctions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11801))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 827 Accesses

Abstract

We study risk-free bidding strategies in combinatorial auctions with incomplete information. Specifically, what is the maximum profit a complement-free (subadditive) bidder can guarantee in an auction against individually rational bidders? Suppose there are n bidders and \(B_i\) is the value bidder i has for the entire set of items. We study the above problem from the perspective of the first bidder, Bidder 1. In this setting, the worst case profit guarantees arise in a duopsony, that is when \(n=2\), so this problem then corresponds to playing an auction against an individually rational, budgeted adversary with budget \(B_2\). We present worst-case guarantees for two simple combinatorial auctions; namely, the sequential and simultaneous auctions, for both the first-price and second-price case. In the general case of distinct items, our main results are for the class of fractionally subadditive (XOS) bidders, where we show that for both first-price and second-price sequential auctions Bidder 1 has a strategy that guarantees a profit of at least \((\sqrt{B_1}-\sqrt{B_2})^2\) when \(B_2 \le B_1\), and this bound is tight. More profitable guarantees can be obtained for simultaneous auctions, where in the first-price case, Bidder 1 has a strategy that guarantees a profit of at least \(\frac{(B_1-B_2)^2}{2B_1}\), and in the second-price case, a bound of \(B_1-B_2\) is achievable. We also consider the special case of sequential auctions with identical items. In that setting, we provide tight guarantees for bidders with subadditive valuations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recall that the only constraint on an individually rational agent is that it play a strategy that is guaranteed to provide non-negative utility; thus, an individually rational agent need not be utility maximizing (rational).

  2. 2.

    This is the standard definition of XOS functions. Fractionally subadditive functions are defined in terms of fractional set covers; the equivalence between fractionally subadditive and XOS functions was shown by Feige [9].

References

  1. Ashenfelter, O.: How auctions work for wine and art. J. Econ. Perspect. 3(3), 23–36 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bae, J., Beigman, E., Berry, R., Honig, M., Vohra, R.: On the efficiency of sequential auctions for spectrum sharing. In: 2009 International Conference on Game Theory for Networks, pp. 199–205 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhawalkar, K., Roughgarden, T.: Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 700–709 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cai, Y., Papadimitriou, C.: Simultaneous Bayesian auctions and computational complexity. In: Proceedings of 15th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC), pp. 895–910 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chanel, O., Gérard-Varet, L., Vincent, S.: Auction theory and practice: evidence from the market for jewellery. In: Ginsburgh, V., Menger, P. (eds.) Economics of the Arts: Selected Essays, pp. 135–149. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christodoulou, G., Kovács, A., Schapira, M.: Bayesian combinatorial auctions. J. ACM 63(2), 11:1–11:19 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Daskalakis, C., Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C.H.: The game world is flat: the complexity of Nash equilibria in succinct games. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 513–524. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Etessami, K.: The complexity of computing a (quasi-)perfect equilibrium for an \(n\)-player extensive form game of perfect recall. Games Econ. Behav. (2019, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feige, U.: On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive. SIAM J. Comput. 39(1), 122–142 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman, M., Fu, H., Gravin, N., Lucier, B.: Simultaneous auctions are (almost) efficient. In: Proceedings of 49th Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 201–210 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman, M., Lucier, B., Syrgkanis, V.: Limits of efficiency in sequential auctions. In: Chen, Y., Immorlica, N. (eds.) WINE 2013. LNCS, vol. 8289, pp. 160–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45046-4_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gale, I., Stegeman, M.: Sequential auctions of endogenously valued objects. Games Econ. Behav. 36(1), 74–103 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallegati, M., Giulioni, G., Kirman, A., Palestrini, A.: What’s that got to do with the price of fish?: Buyer’s behavior on the Ancona fish market. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 80(1), 20–33 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginsburgh, V., van Ours, J.: On organizing a sequential auction: results from a natural experiment by Christie’s. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 59(1), 1–15 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassidim, A., Kaplan, H., Mansour, Y., Nisan, N.: Non-price equilibria in markets of discrete goods. In: Proceedings of 12th Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), pp. 295–296 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lehmann, B., Lehmann, D., Nisan, N.: Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. Games Econ. Behav. 55(2), 270–296 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Milgrom, P., Weber, R.: A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50, 1089–1122 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Myerson, R.: Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1), 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Narayan, V.V., Prebet, E., Vetta, A.: The declining price anomaly is not universal in multi-buyer sequential auctions (but almost is). In: Fotakis, D., Markakis, E. (eds.) SAGT 2019. LNCS, vol. 11801, pp. 109–122. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paes Leme, R., Syrgkanis, V., Tardos, E.: The curse of simultaneity. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS), pp. 60–67 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paes Leme, R., Syrgkanis, V., Tardos, E.: Sequential auctions and externalities. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 869–886 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Financ. 16(1), 8–37 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber, R.: Multiple object auctions. In: Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., Shubik, M., Stark, R. (eds.) Auctions, Bidding and Contracting: Use and Theory, pp. 165–191. New York University Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishnu V. Narayan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Narayan, V.V., Rayaprolu, G., Vetta, A. (2019). Risk-Free Bidding in Complement-Free Combinatorial Auctions. In: Fotakis, D., Markakis, E. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11801. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30473-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30473-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30472-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30473-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics