Skip to main content

Scrum Project Management Dynamics Simulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 547 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1052))

Abstract

The paper presents dynamic aspects of software development project management. Particularly, a client influence or intervention risks, staff promotions, and their influences to software development project management with Agile/Scrum approaches and processes in terms of project performance dynamics and also economic results are considered. During the software development life cycle, the development team is expected to understand customer needs, but it is challenged by many constraints, e.g. narrow project schedule, customers’ interventions and changes, short budget, or staff promotions. For this analysis a simulation model of software project management with application of continuous simulation by System Dynamics (SD) approach is developed. The paper shows dynamics of software project management caused by project risks and disturbances, particularly client interference or intervention, and also draws some conclusions regarding client intervention risk management during software contractor project performance, based on simulation experiments. The paper constitutes an original proposal of PM archetype simulation model and a research of client intervention risk influence to software project management due to application of Agile/Scrum elements within classical PMI/PRINCE2 methods management environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Kern, J.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001). http://agilemanifesto.org/

  2. Ciric, D., Lalic, B., Gracanin, D., Palcic, I., Zivlak, N.: Agile project management in new product development and innovation processes: challenges and benefits beyond software domain. In: 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE), March 2018, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coyle, R.L.: System Dynamics Modelling. A Practical Approach. Chapman & Hall, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan, W.R. (ed.): A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMI Publ. Newtown Square U.S.A. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferreira, S., Collofello, J., Shunk, D., Mackulak, G.: Understanding the effects of requirements volatility in software engineering by using analytical modeling and software process simulation. J. Syst. Softw. 82(10), 1568–1577 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Forrester, J.W.: Industrial Dynamics. Productivity Press, Cambridge (1961). Available also from Pegasus Communications, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ilaria Lunesu, M., Muench, J., Marchesi, M., Kuhrmann, M.: Using simulation for understanding and reproducing distributed software development processes in the cloud. Inf. Softw. Technol. 103, 226–238 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunreuther, H., Slovic, P.: Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, vol. 545. SAGE Periodicals Press, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lyneis, J.M., Ford, D.N.: System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 23(2–3), 157–190 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Magalhães Magdaleno, A., Lima Werner, C.M., Mendes de Araujo, R.: Reconciling software development models: a quasi-systematic review. J. Syst. Softw. 85(2), 351–369 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodrigues, A., Bowers, J.: System dynamics in project management: a comparative analysis with traditional methods. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 12(2), 121–140 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scrum Alliance 2016. The State of Scrum Report 2017 Edn. (2017). https://www.scrumalliance.org/learn-about-scrum/state-of-scrum/2017-state-ofscrum

  13. SCRUMIA – An educational game for teaching SCRUM in computer courses. J. Syst. Softw. 86(10), 2675–2687 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sterman, J.D.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modelling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vallon, R., da Silva Estácio, B.J., Prikladnicki, R., Grechenig, T.: Systematic literature review on agile practices in global software development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 96, 161–180 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. White, A.S.: A control system project development model derived from system dynamics. Int. J. Project Manag. 29(6), 696–705 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman Pietroń .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pietroń, R. (2020). Scrum Project Management Dynamics Simulation. In: Wilimowska, Z., Borzemski, L., Świątek, J. (eds) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 40th Anniversary International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2019. ISAT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1052. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30443-0_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics