Abstract
Use of Technology and Unified Theory of Acceptance was being utilized in this research study to authenticate the application of a new environment, which is not work associated. The model is used to examine acceptance and willingness of University students’ use of social media for learning purposes. Social and peer influence are relevant factors that influence the acceptance of social media for learning purposes. Access to social media might be denied to students by a parent or institutional management if it was used for wrong reasons rather than learning purpose. The results show that all five independents variables have a direct effect on usage for learning purpose. The results also show that social media conditions have a direct hypothesized effect on usage for learning purpose. This may be attributed to the facts that not all social media can be easily used for learning purposes. Another important factor is peer influence that is found to be an important factor. The perception of students would also be affected if social media are perceived only for social activities such as watching films, playing the game and relaxing with family and friends.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Manoj, P., Andrew, B.W.: Social computing: an overview. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19(7), 762–780 (2007)
John, G.C., Irene, G.: Students’ perceptions and readiness towards mobile learning in colleges of education: a Nigerian perspective. S. Afr. J. Educ. 37(1), 1–12 (2017)
Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus. Horizons 53(1), 59–68 (2010)
Dabbagh, N., Kitsantas, A.: Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High. Educ. 15, 3–8 (2012)
Kulakli, A., Mahony, S.: Knowledge creation and sharing with Web 2.0 tools for teaching and learning roles in so-called University 2.0. In: 10th International Strategic Management Conference, 19–21 June 2014, Elsevier Ltd., Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 150, pp. 648–657 (2014)
Danciu, E., Grosseck, G.: Social aspects of web 2.0 technologies: teaching or teachers’ challenges? In: WCES 2011, 03–07 February 2011, Elsevier Ltd, Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 3768–3773 (2011)
Ogundokun, R.O., Adebiyi M., Abikoye, O., Oladele, T., Adeniyi, A., Akande, N.: Performance Evaluation: Dataset on the Scholastic Performance of Students in 12 Programmes from a Private University in the South-West Geopolitical Zone in Nigeria. F1000 Research (2018)
Lukman, A.F., Adebimpe, O., Onate, C.A., Ogundokun, R.O., Gbadamosi, B., Oluwayemi, M.O.: Data on expenditure, revenue, and economic growth in Nigeria. Data Brief 20, 1704–1709 (2018)
Wagner, R.: Social media tools for teaching and learning. Athletic Training Educ. J. 6, 51–52 (2011)
Oberer, B., Erkollar, A.: Social media integration in higher education. cross-course google plus integration is shown in the example of a master ‘s degree courses in management. In: CY-ICER 2012, 08–10 February 2012, Elsevier Ltd., Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 47, pp. 1888–1893 (2012)
Popoiu, M.C., Grosseck, G., Holotescu, C.: What do we know about the use of social media in medical education. In: WCES 2012, 02–05 February 2012, Elsevier Ltd., Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 46, pp. 2262–2266 (2012)
Thomas, M., Thomas, H.: Using new social media and Web 2.0 technologies in business school teaching and learning. J. Manage. Dev. 3, 358–367 (2012)
Bexheti, L.A., Ismaili, B.E., Cico, B.H.: An analysis of social media usage in teaching and learning: the case of SEEU. In: 2014 International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Signal Processing, Communications and Computers, 15–17 March 2014, Venice, pp. 90–94 (2014)
Dear, A.R., Potts, L.: Teaching and learning with social media tools, cultures, and best practices. Programmatic Persp. 6, 21–40 (2014)
Rasiah, R.R.V.: Transformative higher education teaching and learning: using social media in a team-based learning environment. In: TTLC 2013, 23 November 2013, Elsevier Ltd., Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 123, pp. 369–379 (2014)
Williams, D.J., Gownder, P., Laura, W.: How to Turn Social Media Assets into Social Co-Creation Assets. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA (2010)
Davis, C.H.F., Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C., Gonzalez Canche, M.S.: Social Media in higher education: A literature review and research directions. The Center for the Study of the Higher Education at the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University (2012). http://work.bepress.com/hfdavis/2/
Violino, B.: The buzz on campus: social networking takes hold. Community Coll. J. 79(6), 28–30 (2009)
Gikas, J., Grant, M.M.: Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cell phones, smartphones & social media. Internet High. Educ. 19, 18–26 (2013)
Brittain, C.V.: Adolescent choices and parent-peer cross-pressures. Am. Sociol. Rev. 28, 385–391 (1965)
Berndt, T.J.: Development Changes in Conformity to Peers and Parents. Dev. Psychol. 15, 608–616 (1979)
Savin-Williams, R.C., Berndt, T.J.: Friendship and peer relations. In: Elliott, S.S.R. (ed.) At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent, pp. 277–307. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Sim, T.N., Koh, S.F.: A domain conceptualization of adolescent susceptibility to peer pressure. J. Res. Adolesc. 13(1), 57–80 (2003)
Santor, D.A., Messervey, D., Kusumakar, V.: Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. J. Youth Adolesc. 29(2), 163–182 (2004)
Lloyd-Richardson, E.E., Papandonatos, G., Kazura, A.: Differentiating stages of smoking intensity among adolescents: stage-specific psychological and social influences. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 70(4), 998–1009 (2002)
Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(2), 144–176 (1995)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)
Grinter, R.E., Palen, L.: Instant messaging in teen life. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 21–30 (2002)
Huang, A.H., Yen, D.C.: The usefulness of instant messaging among young users: social vs work perspective. Hum. Syst. Manage. 22(2), 63–72 (2003)
Nardi, B.A., Whittaker, S., Bradner, E.: Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 79–88 (2000)
Renneker, J., Godwin, L.: Theorizing the unintended consequences of instant messaging for worker productivity, sprouts: working papers on information environments. Syst. Organ. (3) (2003). http://weatherhead.cwru.edu/sprouts/2003030307.pdf
Miloševic, I., Zivkovic, D., Arsic, S., Manasijevic, D.: Facebook as a virtual classroom – social networking in learning and teaching among Serbian students. Telematics Inform. 32, 576–585 (2015)
Yoo, S.J., Han, S.H., Huang, W.H.: The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-Learning in the workplace: a case from South Korea. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(3), 942–950 (2012)
Guo, Y., Barnes, S.: Purchase behavior in virtual worlds: an empirical investigation in second life. Inf. Manage. 48(7), 303–312 (2011)
Guo, Y., Barnes, S.J.: Explaining purchasing behavior within World of Warcraft. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 52(3), 18–30 (2012)
Bhattacherjee, A., Premkumar, G.: Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Q. 28(2), 229–254 (2004)
Hess, T.J., Joshi, K., McNab, A.L.: An alternative lens for understanding technology acceptance: an equity comparison perspective. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 20(2), 123–154 (2010)
Kim, C., Jahng, J., Lee, J.: An empirical investigation into the utilization-based information technology success model: integrating task-performance and social influence perspective. J. Inf. Technol. 22(2), 152–160 (2007)
Zhou, T., Lu, Y.B., Wang, B.: Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(4), 760–767 (2010)
Acknowledgment
This research is fully sponsored by Landmark University Centre for Research and Development, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Awotunde, J.B., Ogundokun, R.O., Ayo, F.E., Ajamu, G.J., Adeniyi, E.A., Ogundokun, E.O. (2020). Social Media Acceptance and Use Among University Students for Learning Purpose Using UTAUT Model. In: Borzemski, L., Świątek, J., Wilimowska, Z. (eds) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 40th Anniversary International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2019. ISAT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1050. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30440-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30440-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30439-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30440-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)