Skip to main content

Advancing Death? Discourse and Authority in Judaic Bioethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dealing with Bioethical Issues in a Globalized World

Part of the book series: Advancing Global Bioethics ((AGBIO,volume 14))

  • 247 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates two arenas in which normativity is both acknowledged and contested within Jewish bioethics. The first is a discursive arena that for the most part involves Jewish bioethicists. I consider how these scholars, clergy and professionals discuss dying and death, and identify at least three layers of problematic conversational issues. The first layer is terminological: strong disagreements exist regarding the very definitions of who and what is in the throes of dying. The second layer pertains to intervening in someone’s dying. This is complicated by how bioethicists read classic texts. The final layer raises meta-ethical issues of conversing across foundational worldviews. For example, some bioethicists consider moral conundrums predominantly through legal lenses whereas others turn more to narratives and some to theology. It is unclear whether and how such foundations facilitate a coherent Jewish bioethical discourse on, say, death and dying issues. The second arena focuses on the dynamics of authority between rabbis and Jews, especially in regard to thinking about and making decisions regarding dying. This dynamic is most conspicuous in the various advance directives published by the streams of modern Jewry. At one extreme are Orthodox advance directives that mandate signatories to abide by strict interpretations of Jewish law, whereas at the other extreme are Reform advance directives that hardly speak of Jewish law or values, and Conservative forms give options based on positions taken by the movement’s centralized committee on law. Examination of such advance directives reveals explicit and implicit notions of rightful authority in regard to making decisions about dying and, ultimately, death. Speaking about and authorizing dying thus illustrate some of the concerns regarding normativity in contemporary Jewish bioethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Babylonian Talmud (BT) Eruvin 13b.

  2. 2.

    This section draws heavily from my unpublished paper, “Who’s Dying? Which Death? Contested Issues in Jewish End-of-Life Deliberations,” delivered at the Judaism, Science, and Medicine Group conference at Arizona State University, February 2016.

  3. 3.

    J. David Bleich, “The Obligation to Heal in Jewish Tradition.” Published in Bleich and Fred Rosner’s Jewish Bioethics (New York: Sanhedrin Press, 1979), 34.

  4. 4.

    Jeffrey Rubenstein, “Can a goses survive for more than three days? The history and definition of the goses.” Journal of Jewish Ethics. 2.2(2016), 1–37.

  5. 5.

    Elliot N. Dorff, Matters of Life and Death (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1998), 199–200.

  6. 6.

    Dorff, Matters of Life and Death, 232.

  7. 7.

    Byron Sherwin, “A View of Euthanasia.” In Contemporary Jewish Ethics and Morality, edited by Elliot N. Dorff and Louis E. Newman (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 363.

  8. 8.

    Ziva Kunda, “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin, 108/3(1990):480–498.

  9. 9.

    BT Avodah Zarah 18a (Vilna). Translation by Jonathan K. Crane, Narratives and Jewish Bioethics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), 102.

  10. 10.

    See Crane 2013.

  11. 11.

    See Crane 2013 for extensive demonstration and analysis of these and other kinds of manipulations.

  12. 12.

    This is the position of Robert Cover and many other narrativists.

  13. 13.

    This is the position of Julius Preuss, Emmanuel Jakobovitz and other legal formalists.

  14. 14.

    In the Agudath Israel document, the word “strict” precedes Orthodox.

  15. 15.

    “Proxy and Directive with Respect to Health Care Decisions and Post-Mortem Decisions.” The Rabbinical Council of America.

  16. 16.

    This reads, “I ask my agent to follow his guidance” in the Agudath Israel document.

  17. 17.

    Union for Reform Judaism, http://www.urj.org/what-we-believe/resolutions/health-care-decisions-dying, accessed September 6, 2017.

  18. 18.

    Kalsman Institute on Judaism and Health, http://kalsman.huc.edu/articles/URJ,%20Jewish%20Family%20Concerns%20Advance%20Directive.pdf, accessed September 6, 2017.

  19. 19.

    “The Medical Directive: A New Comprehensive Advance Care Document.” JAMA, 261:3288–3293, June 9, 1989.

  20. 20.

    The Rabbinical Assembly, http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/story/jewish-medical-directives-health-care-living-will?tp=178, accessed September 6, 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan K. Crane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Suggested Readings

Suggested Readings

1.1 On Jewish Ethics:

  • Crane, Jonathan K. 2015. Jewish Ethics. Jewish Studies Bibliography Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199840731/obo-9780199840731-0087.xml. Accessed 6 Sept 2017.

    • Offers the most recent annotated bibliography of the field.

  • Dorff, Elliot N., and Jonathan K. Crane, eds. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Ethics and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • A state of the art survey of the field, complete with fresh essays by leading scholars around the world on a range of historical, methodological and topical issues.

  • Dorff, Elliot N., and Louis E. Newman, eds. 1995. Contemporary Jewish Ethics and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Collection of classic essays on meta-ethical, methodological and topical concerns.

  • Newman, Louis E. 1998. Past Imperatives: Studies in the History and Theory of Jewish Ethics. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    • A description of the field, critically analyzing the relationships between ethics, law, and theology.

1.2 On Jewish Bioethics:

  • Bleich, J. David. 1998. Bioethical Dilemmas: A Jewish Perspective. Hoboken: Ktav.

    • A compilation of previously published essays on a range of classic bioethical issues, all treated from an Orthodox perspective.

  • Dorff, Elliot N. 1998. Matters of Life and Death: A Jewish Approach to Modern Medical Ethics. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.

    • A cohesive book surveying a range of biomedical issues; the appendix outlines Dorff’s understanding of the relation between religion and morality.

  • Jakobovits, Immanuel. 1959. Jewish Medical Ethics: A Comparative and Historical Study of the Jewish Religious Attitude to Medicine and its Practice. New York: Bloch.

    • A classic, perhaps the first major work in the field, drawing together classic Jewish and other sources on a range of biomedical topics.

  • Zohar, Noam, ed. 2006. Quality of Life in Jewish Bioethics. Lanham: Lexington.

    • Offers a range of Jewish positions on the concept and pragmatic implications of “quality of life” in medicine, especially at end of life.

1.3 On Jewish views of Euthanasia:

  • Crane, Jonathan K. 2013. Narratives and Jewish Bioethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • This analysis of a classic Talmudic source critical to contemporary Jewish euthanasia scholarship reveals some shocking reading strategies.

  • Hurwitz, Peter J., Jacques Picard, and Avraham Steinberg, eds. 2006. Jewish Ethics and the Care of End-of-Life Patients: A Collection of Rabbinical, Bioethical, Philosophical, and Juristic Opinions. Jersey City: Ktav.

    • A collection of essays drawn from such fields as law, history, philosophy and clinical medicine.

  • Mackler, Aaron L. 2000. Life and Death Responsibilities in Jewish Biomedical Ethics. New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America.

    • Essays by the Conservative movement’s Committee on Jewish Law and Standards, especially on end of life care, physician assisted suicide, and euthanasia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Crane, J.K. (2020). Advancing Death? Discourse and Authority in Judaic Bioethics. In: Gielen, J. (eds) Dealing with Bioethical Issues in a Globalized World . Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30432-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics