Skip to main content

Philanthropic Wine Firms and Their CSR Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Sustainability in the Global Wine Industry

Abstract

Philanthropy involves voluntarily donating a business’s resources to others and is a growing practice in the wine industry. Wineries are motivated to engage in philanthropic activities for different reasons, and these motivations lead to decisions about how to communicate philanthropic activity to stakeholders, also referred to as corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication. This chapter reviews the literature pertaining to philanthropy and CSR communication. An examination of whether philanthropically active wine firms are communicating their actions to stakeholders, and if so, the media channels used, is discussed. Quantitative data was collected from wine firms in France, Spain, the USA, Australia and New Zealand using an online questionnaire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birth, G., Illia, L., Lurati, F., & Zamparini, A. (2008). Communicating CSR: Practices among Switzerland’s top 300 companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(2), 182–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, N., & Matic, J. A. (2011). Mapping and leveraging influencers in social media to shape corporate brand perceptions. Corporate Communications, 16(3), 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortree, D. S. (2014). The state of CSR communication research: A summary and future direction. Journal of Public Relations, 8(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: A legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capriotti, P., & Moreno, A. (2007). Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmeta, R., & Viinikka, H. (2017). Corporate philanthropy communication on donor websites. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 15(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone. (2007). Cause evolution survey. Available from www.coneinc.com/content1091.

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relationship rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, S. L., Fuentes-Fernández, R., & Gilinsky, A. (2018). An exploratory examination of philanthropy in the New Zealand, Spanish and US wine industries. Wine Economics and Policy, 7(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galati, A., Sakka, G., Crescimanno, M., Tulone, A., & Fiore, M. (2019). What is the role of social media in several overtones of CSR communication? The case of the wine industry in the Southern Italian regions. British Food Journal, 121(4), 856–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilinsky, A., Jr., Forbes, S. L., & Fuentes-Fernández, R. (2018). An exploratory study of wine business philanthropy in the USA. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 30(2), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjolberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, C. F., & Moreland, K. D. (2007). How Fortune 500 companies used the web for philanthropic and crisis communication following Hurricane Katrina. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 214–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, C., Szolnoki, G., & Thach, L. (2016). Cross-cultural comparison of social media usage in the wine industry: Differences between the United States and Germany. In G. Szolnoki, L. Thach, & D. Kolb (Eds.), Successful social media and ecommerce strategies in the wine industry (pp. 154–166). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management—New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1–2), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communication and corporate social responsibility: Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Ferguson, A. T. (2014). Public expectations of CSR communication: What and how to communicate CSR. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, S., Maklan, S., & French, P. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Exploring stakeholder relationships and programme reporting across leading FTSE companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdesmaki, M., & Takala, T. (2012). Altruism in business—An empirical study of philanthropy in the small business context. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(3), 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Talk the walk: Measuring the impact of strategic philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moir, L., & Taffler, R. (2004). Does corporate philanthropy exist? Business giving to the arts in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: a European Review, 15(2), 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Loose, S., & Remaud, H. (2013). Impact of corporate social responsibility claims on consumer food choice: A cross-cultural comparison. British Food Journal, 115(1), 142–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, B. (2002). US-German business ethics: An intercultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(3), 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patino, A., Pitta, D. A., & Quinones, R. (2012). Social media’s emerging importance in market research. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(3), 233–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payton, R. L. (1988). Philanthropy: Voluntary action for the public good. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as a strategy: When corporate charity “begins at home”. Business and Society, 42(2), 169–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeltz, L. (2012). Consumer-oriented CSR communication: Focusing on ability or morality? Corporate Communications: an International Journal, 17(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, S., Summer, D. A., & Mueller, R. A. E. (2003). Wine on the web in a global market: A comparison of ecommerce readiness and use in Australia, California and Germany. Paper presented at EFITA Conference, July 5–9, Debrecen, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surroca, J., Tribo, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szolnoki, G., Dolan, R., Forbes, S., Thach, L., & Goodman, S. (2018). Using social media for consumer interaction: An international comparison of winery adoption and activity. Wine Economics and Policy, 7(2), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tata, J., & Prasad, S. (2015). CSR communication: An impression management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 765–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanderley, L. S. O., Lucian, R., Farache, F., & de Sousa Filho, J. M. (2008). CSR information disclosure on the web: A context-based approach analysing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L., & Wood, D. J. (1998). International business and society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, J. (2011). Social media in branding: Fulfilling a need. Journal of Brand Management, 18(9), 688–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. (2006). Responsible competitiveness: Reshaping global markets through responsible business practices. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 334–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziek, P. (2009). Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(3), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the efforts of the academics that collected data on philanthropy in their nation’s wine industries that is reported herein: Armando Corsi (Australia), Armand Gilinsky Jr. (USA), Coralie Haller (France) and Sharon Forbes (New Zealand).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosana Fuentes Fernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernández, R.F., Aboah, J. (2020). Philanthropic Wine Firms and Their CSR Communication. In: Forbes, S., De Silva, TA., Gilinsky Jr., A. (eds) Social Sustainability in the Global Wine Industry . Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30413-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics