Skip to main content

Reuse as a Bridge Between Waste Prevention and the Circular Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1404 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering ((SPRTRCIENG))

Abstract

The chapter deals with the subject of reuse, considered in the perspective of waste prevention. The chapter analyses the Member States approaches towards reuse and highlights the barriers and drivers that may influence its development as a widespread practice. Besides, the reuse businesses is considered also in the perspective of a range of “low-impacts” processes [1], that we could we could call “re”-processes. These processes, all starting from deconstruction/disassembly activities, can be identified as: rebuild, reclaim, recondition, reconstruct, refurbish, remanufacture, renew/renovate, repair, repurpose, restore, rework. In particular the chapter focuses of the remanufacturing practices.

This chapter is authored by Cinzia Talamo, Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering, Milan, Italy. e-mail: cinzia.talamo@polimi.it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to Bougrain and Laurenceau [6] disassembly means: “taking apart components without damaging, but not necessarily to reuse them” while “deconstruction is similar to disassembly but with thoughts towards reusing the components”. Conversely, the action of demolition is “a process of intentional destruction” that generates waste that can be recycled.

  2. 2.

    See also (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circulareconomy/index_en.htm) for circular economy.

  3. 3.

    Between the examples of waste prevention measures referred to the article 29, the Waste Framework Directive includes: “the promotion of the reuse and/or repair of appropriate dis-carded products or of their components, notably through the use of educational, economic, logistic or other measures such as support to or establishment of accredited repair and reuse centres and networks especially in densely populated regions”.

  4. 4.

    Degradation: Detrimental change in physical condition, with time, use or external cause. Note 1 Degradation may lead to a failure. Note 2 In a system context, degradation may also be caused by failures within the system [13].

  5. 5.

    Obsolescence: State of an object, determined by a process of transformation, that causes a situation of non-compliance between requirements and provided performances.

  6. 6.

    In this field, the research RENetTA, recently funded by Fondazione Cariplo, is being developed in Politecnico di Milano. The reserch investigates the potential second life or the extension of the life of building products, characterized by short-term service life.

    The research project aims at defining:

    • key criteria for re-manufacturing: criteria for the design of components “to be re-manufactured”; interpretative keys to understand the re-manufacturing attitude of a component to be disassembled and re-manufactured; obstacles/barriers (e.g. legislative) and levers (e.g. guarantee conditions, certified environmental value, economic value);

    • through a multi-sectoral analysis: organizational conditions; criteria for the start of re-manufacturing processes; levers for the launch of successful re-manufacturing processes from an economic and environmental point of view; economic, environmental and social benefits to be used as levers for the start up of re-manufacturing processes;

    • rules to support the re-manufacturing processes: relationship rules (organizational, procedural, etc.); assembly, disassembly and processing procedures in relation to various technical elements (interior walls, finishes, floors, ceilings, external skin, windows frames); quality procedures, standards and methods for defining the characteristics of components easy to be re-manufactured; methods for exchanging materials and products; methods for sharing information and communication protocols; procedures of application of LC-based indicators aiming at identifying the environmentally and economically more effective strategies to be adopted in re-manufacturing processes (e.g. definition of the maximum advantageous physical distance between disassembly site and remanufacturer) [20].

  7. 7.

    There is a direct relationship between the number of trades and the number of internal components/fittings renewals, caused by the change of the owners and, therefore, by a change of their needs and requests.

  8. 8.

    See the project BAMB (Buildings As Material Banks) that deals with the development of a building pass. The aim of the project is the reduction or elimination of construction and demolition waste. In the process, buildings are regarded as material banks (http://www.bamb2020.eu).

  9. 9.

    Commission Decision 2000/532/EC [21].

  10. 10.

    The analytical report was prepared by the EEA together with Eionet countries and the European Topic Centre on Waste and Materials in a Green Economy (ETC/WMGE). It presents an overview of findings from the analysis of information provided by European 32 countries, reviewing national approaches to material resource efficiency and exploring similarities and differences in policy responses. The analysis is based on the information provided by participating EEA member countries through the Eionet National Reference Centres on Resource Efficient Economy (NRCs) and the National Focal Points (NFPs). The main focus of the report is on policies and initiatives for material resources. The scope includes material flows entering or leaving an economy (biomass, non-metallic minerals, metal ores and fossil energy materials) as well as secondary (waste–derived) raw materials. Also within the scope are the transformations that materials undergo throughout their full life cycle, and initiatives to close material loops in the context of a circular economy.

  11. 11.

    The EEA (2015) study “Waste prevention in Europe—the status in 2014” reviews by the waste prevention programmes in Europe. The review process covers programmes in the 28 European Union (EU) Member States and the three European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries, namely Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.

    The investigated waste prevention programmes contain a wide variety of policy instruments, but these can be grouped into four main types:

    • information instruments, including labels, awareness-raising campaigns and pilot projects;

    • regulatory instruments, setting binding standards and norms;

    • economic instruments, including tax incentives, green public procurement and direct subventions;

    • voluntary agreements, with clear and measurable targets, mainly initiated by business associations.

  12. 12.

    As an example, in Austria two limits for pre-demolition audits exist: 100 tons and 3.500 m³ of estimated CD waste produced.

  13. 13.

    To give two examples:

    • the French regulation for construction and building projects specifies how to identify waste from demolition and refurbishment of buildings. The buildings concerned are those, industrial or commercial, with a surface area of more than 1000 m2 for each floor or farm, that have been exposed to hazardous substances. The works concern the reconstruction and/or demolition of a major part of the structure of the building. The entity in charge must carry out the identification, before applying for the demolition permit or before accepting estimates for contracting, by specifying: the characteristics, the quantity and the location of material and waste, the modalities of management, which materials are re-used on site, recovered or eliminated. At the end of the works, the contracting authority writes an assessment of works indicating the nature and the amount of material actually re-used on site and that of waste that is recovered or eliminated. The contracting entity sends the form to the French Environment and Energy Management Agency which presents a yearly report to the Ministry in charge of construction. See: www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000025145228;

    • the Dutch certification scheme for demolition processes (BRL SVMS-007) is a voluntary tool to improve the quality of the demolition process. Customers who prescribe to this certification scheme of procurement and tendering are assured of environmentally and safe demolition on site. The scheme is controlled by third parties and the Council of Accreditation. The certified demolition process follows four steps: pre-demolition audit; waste management plan; execution; final report. See: www.veiligslopen.nl/en/home.

References

  1. EEA (2018) Report No 4/2018, Waste prevention in Europe—policies, status and trends in reuse in 2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. RWS (2015) Circular economy in the Dutch construction sector. A perspective for the market and government, final report

    Google Scholar 

  3. EEA (2016) More from less—material resource efficiency in Europe 2015 overview of policies, instruments and targets in 32 countries, EEA Report No 10/2016

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rose C, Stegemann J (2018) From waste management to component management in the construction industry. Sustainability 10(1):229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hobbs G, Adams K (2017) Reuse of building products and materials–barriers and opportunities. In: International HISER conference on advances in recycling and management of construction and demolition waste 21–23 June 2017, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bougrain F, Laurenceau S (2017) Reuse of building components: an economic analysis. In: International HISER conference on advances in recycling and management of construction and demolition waste 21–23 June 2017, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  7. COM (2015) 614, Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Closing the loop—an EU action plan for the Circular Economy

    Google Scholar 

  8. EEA (2016) Circular economy in Europe—developing the knowledge base, EEA Report No 2/2016, European environment agency. EEA, 2017, Circular by design—Products in the circular economy, EEA Report No 6/2017, European Environment Agency

    Google Scholar 

  9. Directives (EU) 2018/851 of the European parliament and of the council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste

    Google Scholar 

  10. Directives 2008/98/EC on waste, 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment

    Google Scholar 

  11. EC (2017) Resource efficient use of mixed wastes. Improving management of construction and demolition waste. Final report

    Google Scholar 

  12. EC ERN (2015) Remanufacturing market study, report

    Google Scholar 

  13. EN 13306: 2010, Maintenance—maintenance terminology

    Google Scholar 

  14. APRA Europe (2012) Remanufacturing terminology: remanufacturing term guideline

    Google Scholar 

  15. BS 8887: 2009, Design for manufacture, assembly, disassembly and end-of-life processing (MADE) Part 2: Terms and definitions

    Google Scholar 

  16. EMF (2013) Towards the circular economy, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  17. Triple Win (2014) The economic, social and environmental case for remanufacturing, report

    Google Scholar 

  18. CLEPA Reman Definition & Process (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ISO 9000:2005, Quality management systems—fundamentals and vocabulary

    Google Scholar 

  20. Talamo C, Lavagna M, Monticelli C, Atta N, Giorgi S, Viscuso S Re-NetTA. Re-manufacturing networks for tertiary architectures. In: Della Torre S, Cattaneo S, Lenzi C, Zanelli A (eds) The regeneration of the built environment from a circular economy perspective, Springer, In press

    Google Scholar 

  21. Commission Decision 2000/532/EC of 3 May 2000 replacing Decision 94/3/EC establishing a list of wastes pursuant to Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste and Council Decision 94/904/EC establishing a list of hazardous waste pursuant to Article 1(4) of Council Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste (notified under document number C(2000) 1147) (Text with EEA relevance)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ELoW codes and corresponding EWC-Stat Codes (2017), Resource Efficient Use of Mixed Wastes – Improving management of construction and demolition waste—Final report 2017

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heinrich MA (2017) Material flows of the German building sector. In: International HISER conference on advances in recycling and management of construction and demolition waste 21–23 June 2017, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 302–305

    Google Scholar 

  24. EEA (2015) Waste prevention in Europe—the status in 2014, Report No 6/2015

    Google Scholar 

  25. Akinade OO, Oyedele LO, Omoteso K, Ajayi SO, Bilal M, Owolabi HA, Looney JH (2017) BIM-based deconstruction tool: towards essential functionalities. Int J Sustain Built Environ 6(1):260–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Akanbi LA, Oyedele LO, Akinade OO, Ajayi AO, Delgado MD, Bilal M, Bello SA (2018) Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: a BIM-based whole-life performance estimator. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bilal M, Oyedele LO, Qadir J, Munir K, Akinade OO, Ajayi SO, Owolabi HA (2015) Analysis of critical features and evaluation of BIM software: towards a plug-in for construction waste minimization using big data. Int J Sustain Build Technol Urban Dev 6(4):211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. EU Construction & Demolition Waste Management Protocol (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Migliore .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Migliore, M., Talamo, C., Paganin, G. (2020). Reuse as a Bridge Between Waste Prevention and the Circular Economy. In: Strategies for Circular Economy and Cross-sectoral Exchanges for Sustainable Building Products. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30318-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30318-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30317-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30318-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics