Abstract
The first step in the literature search was finding relevant papers that dealt with reactance in the context of human–computer interaction. In order to find such papers, a literature search was performed in the ACM digital library (https://scholar.google.com/) publication database, Google Scholar (https://dl.acm.org/), as well as in ScienceDirect (https://www.sciencedirect.com/) and also in the references of identified papers. The results of the research that is described in Chaps. 2 and 3 have been published in [7]. The texts in this chapter roughly follow the published paper but data has been reanalyzed. That publication also includes the publications [5, 6] which were published by the author of this thesis. These publications cover experiments that are presented in Chaps. 4 and 8 and are therefore not included in the current literature analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Usually a consequence of state reactance. An attempt to restore the lost freedom of choice, e.g., by doing the opposite of what was intended by the persuasive agent.
References
Debora, Dhanya A., Pricilda Jaidev, U.: Consumer reactance: a review of research methodologies. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 118(18), 4449–4467 (2018)
Brehm, J.W.: A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press, New York (1966)
Brehm, S.S., Brehm, J.W.: Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. Academic Press, New York (1981)
Edwards, S.M., Li, H., Lee, J.H.: Forced exposure and psychological reactance: antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. J. Advert. 31(3), 83–95 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673678
Ehrenbrink, P., Gong, X.G., Möller, S.: Implications of different feedback types on error perception and psychological reactance. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, OzCHI ’16, pp. 358–362. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010994
Ehrenbrink, P., Hillmann, S., Weiss, B., Möller, S.: Psychological reactance in HCI: a method towards improving acceptance of devices and services. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, OzCHI ’16, pp. 478–482. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010978
Ehrenbrink, P., Prezenski, S.: Causes of psychological reactance in human-computer interaction—a literature review and survey. In: Proceedings of the 35th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE), pp. 1–8. ACM, NY, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3121283.3121304. Electronic
Laschke, M., Diefenbach, S., Schneider, T., Hassenzahl, M.: Keymoment: Initiating behavior change through friendly friction. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, pp. 853–858. ACM (2014)
Lee, G., Lee, W.J.: Psychological reactance to online recommendation services. Inf. Manage. 46(8), 448–452 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.07.005
Li, C., Meeds, R.: Factors affecting information processing of internet advertisements: A test on exposure conditions, psycholgical reactance, and advertising frequency. American Academy of Advertising. Conference of Proceedings (Online), pp. 93–101. American Academy of Advertising, Austin (2007)
Liu, S., Helfenstein, S., Wahlstedt, A.: Social psychology of persuasion applied to human agent interaction. Human Technol. 4(2), 123–143 (2008)
Murray, K.B., Häubl, G.: Freedom of choice, ease of use, and the formation of interface preferences. MIS Quart. 35(4), 955–976 (2011)
Roubroeks, M., Ham, J., Midden, C.: When artificial social agents try to persuade people: The role of social agency on the occurrence of psychological reactance. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3(2), 155–165 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0088-1
Roubroeks, M., Midden, C., Ham, J.: Does it make a difference who tells you what to do ? exploring the effect of social agency on psychological reactance. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Persuasive ’09, pp. 15:1–15:6. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541970
Roubroeks, M., Ham, J., Midden, C.: The dominant robot: threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) Persuasive Technology, pp. 174–184. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)
Stieger, S., Reips, U.D., Voracek, M.: Forced-response in online surveys: bias from reactance and an increase in sex-specific dropout. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58(11), 1653–1660 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.v58:11
White, T.B., Zahay, D.L., Thorbjørnsen, H., Shavitt, S.: Getting too personal: reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Market. Lett. 19(1), 39–50 (2008)
Zheng, X., Liu, N., Zhao, L.: A study of the effectiveness of online scarce promotion-based on the comparison of planned buying and unplanned buying. In: Proceedings of the 12th Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, pp. 247–257 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ehrenbrink, P. (2020). Literature Search—Reactance in Literature. In: The Role of Psychological Reactance in Human–Computer Interaction. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30310-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30310-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30309-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30310-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)