Skip to main content

Analysis of Behavioral Changes Observed in Users of Sustainable Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030

Abstract

This study has the main objective to analyze changes in social behaviors resulting from the application of sustainable methodologies in family and business environments. The work will be focused on understanding how the personal advantages acquired by individuals who opted to exchange unsustainable daily practices for more actives ones in a general scenario of collective change extend. Through real clients of companies related to selective garbage collection and generation of photovoltaic solar energy, it was possible to observe that the interest in studying and informing about the respective themes increases as the use of them becomes simpler, didactic and recurrent. This fact can be confirmed by creating an analogy with home garden productions, where the closer approximation of users to issues such as health, environmental, consumerism and even planting techniques is visible. This acquired knowledge takes on greater dimensions in the long run, but they are rooted more permanently, unlike most current proposals of study that offer passive and momentary learning. As people who coexist with these users are influenced, collective behavioral changes become real and palpable. Having only the existence of environmental values, with the absence of changes in habits and automatisms, there is no change in behavior on the part of people. The present work will try to show the reader that these statements are in fact real through the intersection of interviews with theoretical foundations, as well as data acquired from the already existing and functioning projects. Combining economic, social and environmental aspects, one can observe in an effective way the real impact of certain daily activities on nature and in the community. The last decades have been marked by the broadening of the debates that approach the natural resources preservation that man uses, where studies show that the present one already represents a real ecological crisis and irreducible dimensions in some cases. Climate change and countless ecosystems undergo daily destabilization and their reflections can be found anywhere in the world. The media has become increasingly emphatic, often for sensational reasons, in presenting situations such as the natural resources reduction, the increase of various types of pollution, global warming, the potable water reserves reduction, the waste excessive production, among others. These themes, related to environmental degradation, have fostered the population’s interest, since they always present the consequences that, due to the decline of environmental quality, will be imposed on the life of modern society. Is that the sustainability concept can be translated into a tripod aspects relating to these reflexes (triple bottom line), and the resulting social, environmental and economic analyzes financial, separately and jointly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves MC, Bassani MA (2008) A psicologia ambiental como área de investigação da inter-relação pessoa-ambiente. Anais do IX Encontro de Pesquisadores

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (2010) The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: debating green neoliberalism. Progress Hum Geogr 34(6):715–735. (SAGE Publications, Sage, UK: London, England)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruntland G (1987) World commission on environment and development (Wced). Our common future

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253. (Nature Publishing Group)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ester P, Simões S, Vinken H (2004) Cultural change and environmentalism: a cross-national approach of mass publics and decision makers, vol 7(2). Ambiente e sociedade, SciELO Brasil, pp 45–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans D, Abrahamse W (2009) Beyond rhetoric: the possibilities of and for ‘sustainable lifestyles’. Environ Polit 18(4):486–502. (Routledge)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol Sci 24(1):56–62. (SAGE Publications, Sage, CA: Los Angeles, CA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge S et al (2013) The global challenge of encouraging sustainable living: opportunities, barriers, policy and practice [S.l.]. Edward Elgar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben B, Murtagh N, Abrahamse W (2014) Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemp Soc Sci 9(4):374–392. (Routledge)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatersleben B et al (2010) Values and sustainable lifestyles. Archit Sci Rev 53(1):37–50. (Taylore Francis)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age [S.l.]. Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R (2007) Environmental psychology: principles and practice [S.l.]. Optimal books Colville, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani MV (2005) Proposal for an answer based on the comparison between “environment and behavior” and “journal of environmental psychology”, vol 16(1–2). Psicologia USP, SciELO Brasil, pp. 89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot RSD, Wilson MA, Boumans RM (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408. (Elsevier)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson K (2002) Competing discourses of sustainable consumption: does the ‘rationalisation of lifestyles’ make sense? Environ Polit 11(2):95–120. (Taylor & Francis)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp DG (1996) Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environ Behav 28(1):111–133. (SAGE Publications, Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse L (2005) Compreendendo o ambiente em psicologia ambiental, vol 16(1–2). Psicologia Usp, SciELO Brasil, pp 41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lander E (2011) The green economy: the wolf in sheep’s clothing, vol 6. Transnational Institute, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Menezes U, Gomes A, Dantas M (2018) Sustentabilidade e seus benefícios: Práticas e ações sustentáveis desenvolvidas em empresas do distrito industrial dos imborés. Anais Eletrônicos SEMAD, ISSN, pp 2358–6397

    Google Scholar 

  • Misoczky MC, Bohm S (2012) Do desenvolvimento sustentável economia verde: a constante e acelerada investida do capital sobre a natureza. Cadernos EBAPE. BR 10(3):546–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser G (1998) Psicologia ambiental, vol 3(1). Estudos de psicologia (Natal), SciELO Brasil, p 121

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta RS (1998) da. Manual para valoração econômica de recursos ambientais [S.l.]. IPEA/MMA/PNUD/CNPq

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro JQ (1997) Psicologia ambiental: a busca de um ambiente melhor, vol 2(2). Estudos de Psicologia, SciELO Brasil, pp 377–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin PD, Electris C, Rosen RA (2010) The century ahead: searching for sustainability. Sustain Mol Diversity Preserv Int 2(8):2626–2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez JAC (1997) La psicología ambiental y los problemas medioambientales. Papeles del Psicólogo: Revista del Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos, vol 67, pp 26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz PW, Zelezny LC (1998) Values and proenvironmental behavior: a five-country survey. J Cross-Cult Psychol 29(4):540–558. (SAGE Publications, Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29(3):309–317. (Elsevier)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC et al (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev JSTOR:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexukll JV (1921) Umwelt und innenwelt der tiere. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Victor Bragatto Prates .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Prates, C.V.B., Rafael, M.C.E., Freitas, M.A.S., Soares, E.d. (2020). Analysis of Behavioral Changes Observed in Users of Sustainable Practices. In: Leal Filho, W., Tortato, U., Frankenberger, F. (eds) Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics