Abstract
This study has the main objective to analyze changes in social behaviors resulting from the application of sustainable methodologies in family and business environments. The work will be focused on understanding how the personal advantages acquired by individuals who opted to exchange unsustainable daily practices for more actives ones in a general scenario of collective change extend. Through real clients of companies related to selective garbage collection and generation of photovoltaic solar energy, it was possible to observe that the interest in studying and informing about the respective themes increases as the use of them becomes simpler, didactic and recurrent. This fact can be confirmed by creating an analogy with home garden productions, where the closer approximation of users to issues such as health, environmental, consumerism and even planting techniques is visible. This acquired knowledge takes on greater dimensions in the long run, but they are rooted more permanently, unlike most current proposals of study that offer passive and momentary learning. As people who coexist with these users are influenced, collective behavioral changes become real and palpable. Having only the existence of environmental values, with the absence of changes in habits and automatisms, there is no change in behavior on the part of people. The present work will try to show the reader that these statements are in fact real through the intersection of interviews with theoretical foundations, as well as data acquired from the already existing and functioning projects. Combining economic, social and environmental aspects, one can observe in an effective way the real impact of certain daily activities on nature and in the community. The last decades have been marked by the broadening of the debates that approach the natural resources preservation that man uses, where studies show that the present one already represents a real ecological crisis and irreducible dimensions in some cases. Climate change and countless ecosystems undergo daily destabilization and their reflections can be found anywhere in the world. The media has become increasingly emphatic, often for sensational reasons, in presenting situations such as the natural resources reduction, the increase of various types of pollution, global warming, the potable water reserves reduction, the waste excessive production, among others. These themes, related to environmental degradation, have fostered the population’s interest, since they always present the consequences that, due to the decline of environmental quality, will be imposed on the life of modern society. Is that the sustainability concept can be translated into a tripod aspects relating to these reflexes (triple bottom line), and the resulting social, environmental and economic analyzes financial, separately and jointly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211. Elsevier
Alves MC, Bassani MA (2008) A psicologia ambiental como área de investigação da inter-relação pessoa-ambiente. Anais do IX Encontro de Pesquisadores
Bakker K (2010) The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: debating green neoliberalism. Progress Hum Geogr 34(6):715–735. (SAGE Publications, Sage, UK: London, England)
Bruntland G (1987) World commission on environment and development (Wced). Our common future
Costanza R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253. (Nature Publishing Group)
Ester P, Simões S, Vinken H (2004) Cultural change and environmentalism: a cross-national approach of mass publics and decision makers, vol 7(2). Ambiente e sociedade, SciELO Brasil, pp 45–66
Evans D, Abrahamse W (2009) Beyond rhetoric: the possibilities of and for ‘sustainable lifestyles’. Environ Polit 18(4):486–502. (Routledge)
Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol Sci 24(1):56–62. (SAGE Publications, Sage, CA: Los Angeles, CA)
Fudge S et al (2013) The global challenge of encouraging sustainable living: opportunities, barriers, policy and practice [S.l.]. Edward Elgar Publishing
Gatersleben B, Murtagh N, Abrahamse W (2014) Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemp Soc Sci 9(4):374–392. (Routledge)
Gatersleben B et al (2010) Values and sustainable lifestyles. Archit Sci Rev 53(1):37–50. (Taylore Francis)
Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age [S.l.]. Stanford University Press
Gifford R (2007) Environmental psychology: principles and practice [S.l.]. Optimal books Colville, WA
Giuliani MV (2005) Proposal for an answer based on the comparison between “environment and behavior” and “journal of environmental psychology”, vol 16(1–2). Psicologia USP, SciELO Brasil, pp. 89–102
Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, Chicago, IL
Groot RSD, Wilson MA, Boumans RM (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408. (Elsevier)
Hobson K (2002) Competing discourses of sustainable consumption: does the ‘rationalisation of lifestyles’ make sense? Environ Polit 11(2):95–120. (Taylor & Francis)
Karp DG (1996) Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environ Behav 28(1):111–133. (SAGE Publications, Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks)
Kruse L (2005) Compreendendo o ambiente em psicologia ambiental, vol 16(1–2). Psicologia Usp, SciELO Brasil, pp 41–46
Lander E (2011) The green economy: the wolf in sheep’s clothing, vol 6. Transnational Institute, Amsterdam
Menezes U, Gomes A, Dantas M (2018) Sustentabilidade e seus benefícios: Práticas e ações sustentáveis desenvolvidas em empresas do distrito industrial dos imborés. Anais Eletrônicos SEMAD, ISSN, pp 2358–6397
Misoczky MC, Bohm S (2012) Do desenvolvimento sustentável economia verde: a constante e acelerada investida do capital sobre a natureza. Cadernos EBAPE. BR 10(3):546–568
Moser G (1998) Psicologia ambiental, vol 3(1). Estudos de psicologia (Natal), SciELO Brasil, p 121
Motta RS (1998) da. Manual para valoração econômica de recursos ambientais [S.l.]. IPEA/MMA/PNUD/CNPq
Pinheiro JQ (1997) Psicologia ambiental: a busca de um ambiente melhor, vol 2(2). Estudos de Psicologia, SciELO Brasil, pp 377–398
Raskin PD, Electris C, Rosen RA (2010) The century ahead: searching for sustainability. Sustain Mol Diversity Preserv Int 2(8):2626–2651
Rodriguez JAC (1997) La psicología ambiental y los problemas medioambientales. Papeles del Psicólogo: Revista del Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos, vol 67, pp 26–30
Schultz PW, Zelezny LC (1998) Values and proenvironmental behavior: a five-country survey. J Cross-Cult Psychol 29(4):540–558. (SAGE Publications, Sage, CA: Thousand Oaks)
Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29(3):309–317. (Elsevier)
Stern PC et al (1999) A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum Ecol Rev JSTOR:81–97
Uexukll JV (1921) Umwelt und innenwelt der tiere. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prates, C.V.B., Rafael, M.C.E., Freitas, M.A.S., Soares, E.d. (2020). Analysis of Behavioral Changes Observed in Users of Sustainable Practices. In: Leal Filho, W., Tortato, U., Frankenberger, F. (eds) Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30306-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30305-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30306-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)