Skip to main content

The Trustworthiness of Content Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter aims to present criteria for trustworthiness. Qualitative researchers commonly have different opinions about which criteria are the best for evaluating trustworthiness. However, the current consensus is that credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability, and authenticity are the five most relevant terms for determining the trustworthiness of research. This chapter will explain what each of these criteria mean, and will demonstrate how they can be applied to research that includes content analysis. Briefly, credibility can be defined as confidence in the ‘truth’ of the findings. Transferability means that the findings are also applicable in other contexts, while dependability indicates that the findings are consistent and could be replicated. Confirmability describes the degree of neutrality or, in other words, the extent to which the findings of a study reflect the respondents’ opinions and experiences rather than the researchers’ biases, motivations, or interests. Authenticity is concerned with the ability of researchers to accurately depict the diverse realities that exist in the data collected from participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Connelly LM. Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nurs. 2016;25:435–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cypress BS. Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017;36:253–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Altheide DL, Johnson JM. Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In: Denizin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1994. p. 485–99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenhart M, Howe K. Validity in educational research. In: LeCompte M, Millroy W, Preissle J, editors. Handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992. p. 642–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11:522–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications; 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Robson C. Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative content analysis. a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 2014;4:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helvi Kyngäs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kyngäs, H., Kääriäinen, M., Elo, S. (2020). The Trustworthiness of Content Analysis. In: Kyngäs, H., Mikkonen, K., Kääriäinen, M. (eds) The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30198-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30199-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics