Abstract
This chapter aims to present criteria for trustworthiness. Qualitative researchers commonly have different opinions about which criteria are the best for evaluating trustworthiness. However, the current consensus is that credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability, and authenticity are the five most relevant terms for determining the trustworthiness of research. This chapter will explain what each of these criteria mean, and will demonstrate how they can be applied to research that includes content analysis. Briefly, credibility can be defined as confidence in the ‘truth’ of the findings. Transferability means that the findings are also applicable in other contexts, while dependability indicates that the findings are consistent and could be replicated. Confirmability describes the degree of neutrality or, in other words, the extent to which the findings of a study reflect the respondents’ opinions and experiences rather than the researchers’ biases, motivations, or interests. Authenticity is concerned with the ability of researchers to accurately depict the diverse realities that exist in the data collected from participants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Connelly LM. Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nurs. 2016;25:435–6.
Cypress BS. Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017;36:253–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253.
Altheide DL, Johnson JM. Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In: Denizin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1994. p. 485–99.
Eisenhart M, Howe K. Validity in educational research. In: LeCompte M, Millroy W, Preissle J, editors. Handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992. p. 642–80.
Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11:522–37.
Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1:13–22.
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications; 1985.
Robson C. Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993.
Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative content analysis. a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 2014;4:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kyngäs, H., Kääriäinen, M., Elo, S. (2020). The Trustworthiness of Content Analysis. In: Kyngäs, H., Mikkonen, K., Kääriäinen, M. (eds) The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30198-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30199-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)