Skip to main content

Reading the Animal Pulse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Novel and the Multispecies Soundscape

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 332 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines literary texts that deal with one of the many media that function as an interface between humans and other animals: the stethoscope. I first recapitulate existing work about this medical monitoring device in sound studies and literary studies and about creaturely vulnerability in animal studies, and explain how bodily sounds disclose a form of cross-species fragility left unexplored by other accounts of nonhuman audio. The chapter subsequently shows how two novels featuring specialized knowledge of veterinary procedures hint at the common vulnerability of embodied creatures while leaving the conventional species boundary largely in place. A brief look at the historical archive reveals that Bram Stoker’s Dracula monitors this boundary even more anxiously and encourages its readers to experience its sensational narrative in quasi-physical ways, as if trying to animalize their bodies in ways that nevertheless reassure the novel’s audience. By contrast, Cormac McCarthy’s The Crossing and Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis offer less reassuring interpretations of our weird bodies, their creaturely sounds, and the indifferent material universe that envelops us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arata, Stephen D. “The Occidental Tourist: Dracula and the Anxiety of Reverse Colonization”. Victorian Studies 33.4 (1990): 621–45. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, Kirstie. Victorian Poetry and the Culture of the Heart. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilmyer, S. Pearl. “‘The Natural History of My Inward Self’: Sensing Character in George Eliot’s Impressions of Theophrastus Such”. PMLA 129.1 (2014): 35–51. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, Angela et al. “Animal Roles and Traces in the History of Medicine, c. 1880–1980”. BJHS Themes 2 (2017): 11–33. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLillo, Don. Cosmopolis. London: Picador, 2011 [2003]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delville, Michel. “Senses”. Literature Now: Key Terms and Methods for Literary History. Ed. Sascha Bru, Ben De Bruyn, and Michel Delville. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2016. 87–97. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijck, José van. The Transparent Body: A Cultural Analysis of Medical Imaging. Seattle: U of Washington P, 2005. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, George. Middlemarch. London: Penguin, 2012 [1871–2]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, Sid. Swift Dam. Open Books, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, Julius and Markus Wierschem. “Rugged Resonances: From Music in McCarthy to McCarthian Music”. European Journal of American Studies 12.3 (2017). https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/12330. Web. 14 January 2019.

  • Grusin, Richard. “Radical Mediation”. Critical Inquiry 42.1 (2015): 124–48. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. “Technologies of Monstrosity: Bram Stoker’s Dracula”. Victorian Studies 36.3 (1993): 333–52. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Anna. “Listening-touch, Affect and the Crafting of Medical Bodies through Percussion”. Body & Society 22.1 (2016): 31–61. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houser, Heather. Ecosickness in Contemporary U.S. Fiction: Environment and Affect. New York: Columbia UP, 2014. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, Amy. Making Literature Now. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, Amy. “The Bible and Illiterature: Bible Criticism, McCarthy and Morrison, Illiterate Readers”. Postmodern Belief: American Literature and Religion Since 1960. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2010. 76–106. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Cynan. The Dig. London: Granta, 2014. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, David Houston. “All the Moments of Our Lives: Self-Archiving from Christian Boltanski to Lifelogging”. Archives and Records 36.1 (2015): 29–41. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Susan D. Valuing Animals: Veterinarians and Their Patients in Modern America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2002. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenleyside, Heather. “The First-Person Form of Life: Locke, Sterne, and the Autobiographical Animal”. Critical Inquiry 39.1 (2012): 116–41. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Meegan. “Some Body’s Story: The Novel as Instrument”. Novel: A Forum on Fiction 42.3 (2009): 451–9. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Daniel. “Consulting Physicians: The Role of Specialist Medical Advisers in Cormac McCarthy’s Contemporary Fiction”. Literature and Medicine 30.2 (2012): 339–55. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, Friedrich. “Dracula’s Legacy”. Literature, Media, Information Systems. Ed. John Johnston. Amsterdam: OPA, 1997. 50–84. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreilkamp, Ivan. “A Voice Without a Body: The Phonographic Logic of Heart of Darkness”. Victorian Studies 40.2 (1997): 211–44. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laennec, René. A Treatise on the Diseases of the Chest and on Mediate Auscultation. Trans. John Forbes. New York: Samuel Wood & Sons, 1835. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard, J.M. Giraffe. London: Vintage, 2007 [2006]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingis, Alphonso. “Outside”. Social Text 29.1 (2011): 37–42. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malewitz, Raymond. “Narrative Disruption as Animal Agency in Cormac McCarthy’s The Crossing”. Modern Fiction Studies 60.3 (2014): 544–61. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Kate. “The Old Weird”. Modernism/Modernity 23.3 (2016): 631–49. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Leila S. “‘Foul Things of the Night’: Dread in the Victorian Body”. Modern Language Review 93.1 (1998): 16–22. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Cormac. The Border Trilogy. London: Picador, 2002. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGurl, Mark. “Everything and Less: Fiction in the Age of Amazon”. Modern Language Quarterly 77.3 (2016): 447–71. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, Susan. Animal Stories: Narrating Across Species Lines. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.A. “Cage Aux Folles: Sensation and Gender in Wilkie Collins’s The Woman in White”. Representations 14 (1986): 107–36. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles, Mario Ortiz. “Liminanimal”. European Journal of English Studies 19.1 (2015): 10–23. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettman, Dominic. Sonic Intimacy: Voice, Species, Technics (or, How to Listen to the World). Palo Alto: Stanford UP, 2017. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. “Vulnerability”. Critical Terms for Animal Studies. Ed. Lori Gruen. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2018. 410–23. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia UP, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picker, John M. “Aural Anxieties and the Advent of Modernity”. The Victorian World. Ed. Martin Hewitt. London: Routledge, 2012. 603–18. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, Glory. While the Music Played. Amazon, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Amour, Paul. “Ulysses Pianola”. PMLA 130.1 (2015): 15–36. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. London: Penguin Books, 2003 [1818]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukin, Nicole. “Transfections of Animal Touch, Techniques of Biosecurity”. Social Semiotics 21.4 (2011): 483–501. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, Jonathan. The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2003. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, Anne. “Bram Stoker’s Brother, the Brain Surgeon”. Progress in Brain Research 205 (2013): 197–218. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, Bram. Dracula. Richmond: Alma Classics, 2015 [1897]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadde, Aarthi. “Amateur Creativity: Contemporary Literature and the Digital Publishing Scene”. New Literary History 48.1 (2017): 27–51. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viney, William, Felicity Callard, and Angela Woods. “Critical Medical Humanities: Embracing Entanglement, Taking Risks”. Medical Humanities 41 (2015): 2–7. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicke, Jennifer. “Vampiric Typewriting: Dracula and Its Media”. ELH 59.2 (1992): 467–93. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Cary. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youatt, William. Cattle; Their Breeds, Management and Diseases. London: Baldwin and Cradock, 1834. Print.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben De Bruyn .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Bruyn, B. (2020). Reading the Animal Pulse. In: The Novel and the Multispecies Soundscape. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30122-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics