Skip to main content

Introduction: Multispecies Fictions and Their Acoustic Contact Zones

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 388 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

Abstract

The present book charts how early twenty-first-century writers represent the multispecies soundscape, and it reflects on the relations between human and other animals as they are mediated by an array of competing sonic media, the novel especially. It is primarily aimed at three audiences: students and scholars of literature and culture who want to learn more about sound and the human-animal interface; students and scholars who work on animals and the environment more broadly, and would like to understand how nonhuman sounds acquire cultural meaning, in a literary context especially; and students and scholars investigating sound and listening who want to broaden the remit of their research beyond the scope of the human. But I hope the book also caters to the interests of a more diffuse group of readers, who may simply be fascinated by the noisy creatures who inhabit its pages, including echolocating Irrawaddy dolphins, loud Tasmanian devils and quiet Tasmanian tigers, musical crickets, birds, frogs, rumbling African and Asian elephants, laughing and signing chimps, injured dogs and horses with racing hearts, threatening vampires with silent bodies, and several deafened marine mammals, including Cuvier’s beaked whales—not to mention numerous talking and roaring humans. Alternatively, general readers might be drawn to the book’s account of distinct communities of listeners, who experience the sounds of other creatures in ways inflected by their professional status as scientist, recordist, hunter, composer, linguist, vet, doctor, cowboy, submarine captain, or sonar technician—or by more personal, less specialized exchanges with nonhuman animals. As I explain below, this book is not an introduction to biosemiotics or bioacoustics, the two scientific disciplines that study animal communication systems, nor is it an ethnographic study of actual listeners, which summarizes observations of and interviews with anonymized real-life informants. But it tackles related topics in comparing divergent human responses to animal sounds, the changing cultural meanings ascribed to nonhuman vocalizations and other creaturely vibrations. Approaching these topics through the lens of contemporary novels appears strange at first, because literature is conventionally believed to be entirely silent, fictional, and anthropocentric. That is why this introduction clarifies the conception of literature, animals, sounds, and media that underpins my approach, and that explains why this traditional view of the novel is not the whole story, not today, and not in earlier times either. If we adjust our approach slightly and retune our ears, as listeners and readers, we will find that this flexible literary genre provides vital resources for social debates on human-animal relations and the urgent interdisciplinary conversations of the environmental humanities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, Colleen Glenney. Animalia Americana: Animal Representations and Biopolitical Subjectivity. New York: Columbia UP, 2013. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Lucy, Ben De Bruyn, and Jessica Rapson. “Planetary Memory in Contemporary American Fiction”. Textual Practice 31.5 (2017): 853–66. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, Peter. Twenty-First-Century Fiction: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2013. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumm, Henrik and Dietmar Todt. “Noise-Dependent Song Amplitude Regulation in a Territorial Songbird”. Animal Behaviour 63.5 (2002): 891–7. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruyn, Ben De. “Anthropocene Audio: The Animal Soundtrack of the Contemporary Novel”. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 57.2 (2016): 151–65. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruyninckx, Joeri. Listening in the Field: Recording and the Science of Birdsong. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Timothy. The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, Peter A. “The Strange Stillness of the Past: Toward an Environmental History of Sound and Noise”. Environmental History 10.4 (2005): 636–65. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome, ed. Prismatic Ecology: Ecotheory Beyond Green. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2013. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Margaret. “Denotation in Alien Environments: The Underwater Je Ne Sais Quoi”. Representations 125.1 (2014): 103–26. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy Wood, Gillen. “Introduction: Eco-historicism”. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 8.2 (2008): 1–7. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daughtry, J. Martin. Listening to War: Sound, Music, Trauma, and Survival in Wartime Iraq. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2015. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. “The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow)”. Critical Inquiry 28.2 (2002): 369–418. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, Vinciane. What Would Animals Say If We Asked the Right Questions. Trans. Brett Buchanan. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2016 [2012]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimock, Wai Chee. “Hearing Animals: Thoreau between Fable and Elegy”. J19: The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists 1.2 (2013): 397–401. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dooren, Thom. Flight Ways: Life and Loss at the Edge of Extinction. New York: Columbia UP, 2014. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dooren, Thom, Eben Kirskey, and Ursula Münster. “Multispecies Studies: Cultivating Arts of Attentiveness”. Environmental Humanities 8.1 (2016): 1–23. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenman, Stephen F. The Cry of Nature: Art and the Making of Animal Rights. London: Reaktion Books, 2013. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Steven. “Acoustemology”. Keywords in Sound. Ed. David Novak & Matt Sakakeeny. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2015. 12–21. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Charles. Being a Beast. London: Profile Books, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, Thomas. Skylark Meets Meadowlark: Reimagining the Bird in British Romantic and Contemporary Native American Literature. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 2009. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. London: Routledge, 2004. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, Amitav. Gun Island. London: John Murray, 2019. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Hungry Tide. London: Harper Collins, 2005 [2004]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoGwilt, Christopher and Melanie D. Holm, eds. Mocking Bird Technologies: The Poetics of Parroting, Mimicry, and Other Starling Tropes. New York: Fordham UP, 2018. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Barris, Macarena. The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2017. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, T. Austin. The Great American Songbooks: Musical Texts, Modernism, and the Value of Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, Richard. “Radical Mediation”. Critical Inquiry 42.1 (2015): 124–48. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawhee, Debra. Rhetoric in Tooth and Claw: Animals, Language, Sensation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2008. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, Ursula. Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David. Narratology Beyond the Human: Storytelling and Animal Life. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2018. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huehls, Mitchum. After Critique: Twenty-First-Century Fiction in a Neoliberal Age. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggan, Graham and Helen Tiffin. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2015 [2010]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, Emily and Sarah Wasserman. “The Contemporary”. Literature Compass 14.9 (2017), http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lic3.12411/full. Web. 14 March 2019.

  • James, Erin. The Storyworld Accord: Econarratology and Postcolonial Narratives. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 2015. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, Brian. “Sound Studies Without Auditory Culture: A Critique of the Ontological Turn”. Sound Studies 1.1 (2015): 2–21. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Caren. “Precision Targets: GPS and the Militarization of U.S. Consumer Identity”. American Quarterly 58.3 (2006): 693–714. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, Daniel. “Hark! Nineteenth-Century Poetry and the Song of Birds”. The Figure of the Singer. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013. 59–82. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Adam. “Beginning with Postmodernism”. Twentieth Century Literature 57.3–4 (2011): 391–422. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Rosanne. “Multi-Directional Eco-Memory in an Era of Extinction: Colonial Whaling and Indigenous Dispossession in Kim Scott’s That Deadman Dance”. The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. Ed. Ursula K. Heise, Jon Christensen, and Michelle Niemann. 268–77. 2017. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Eduardo. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, Elizabeth. The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. London: Bloomsbury, 2015 [2014]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreilkamp, Ivan. “A Voice Without a Body: The Phonographic Logic of Heart of Darkness”. Victorian Studies 40.2 (1997): 211–44. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMenager, Stephanie. “Petro-Melancholia: The BP Blowout and the Arts of Grief”. Qui Parle 19.2 (2011): 25–56. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundblad, Michael. “Introduction: The End of the Animal – Literary and Cultural Animalities”. Animalities: Literary and Cultural Studies Beyond the Human. Ed. Michael Lundblad. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2017. 1–21. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Helen. H is for Hawk. London: Vintage Books, 2014. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manes, Christopher. “Nature and Silence”. The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm. Athens, GA: U of Georgia P, 1996. 15–29. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Kate. “What Are the Novels of the Anthropocene? American Fiction in Geological Time”. American Literary History 27.3 (2015): 523–38. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGurl, Mark. “Everything and Less: Fiction in the Age of Amazon”. Modern Language Quarterly 77.3 (2016): 447–71. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Posthuman Comedy”. Critical Inquiry 38.3 (2012): 533–53. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Program Era: Postwar Fiction and the Rise of Creative Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, Susan. Animal Stories: Narrating Across Species Lines. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Robert. “What Kind of Literary Animal Studies Do We Want, or Need?”. Modern Fiction Studies 60.3 (2014): 636–44. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menely, Tobias. The Animal Claim: Sensibility and the Creaturely Voice. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2015. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Timothy. Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York: Columbia UP, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2007. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, Rachel. Animal Musicalities: Birds, Beasts, and Evolutionary Listening. Middletown: Wesleyan UP, 2018. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Why Listen to Animals?”. Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts (2018), https://www.litsciarts.org/2018/10/12/why-listen-to-animals/. Web. 9 April 2020.

  • Mukherjee, Pablo. “Water/Land: Amitav Ghosh”. Postcolonial Environments: Nature, Culture, and the Contemporary Indian Novel in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. 108–33. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nealon, Jeffrey. Post-Postmodernism: or, the Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism. Palo Alto: Stanford UP, 2012. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2013 [2011]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettman, Dominic. Sonic Intimacy: Voice, Species, Technics (or, How to Listen to the World). Palo Alto: Stanford UP, 2017. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Dana. “Ecocriticism’s Hard Problems (Its Ironies, Too)”. American Literary History 25.2 (2013): 455–67. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia UP, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radick, Gregory. The Simian Tongue: The Long Debate About Animal Language. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2007. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Literature. Trans. Julie Rose. Cambridge: Polity, 2011 [2006]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles, Mario Ortiz. Literature and Animal Studies. New York: Routledge, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowney, Matthew. “Music in the Noise: The Acoustic Ecology of John Clare”. Journal of Interdisciplinary Voice Studies 1.1 (2016): 23–40. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, Matthew. The Untold Story of the Talking Book. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Amour, Paul. “Ulysses Pianola”. PMLA 130.1 (2015): 15–36. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, David W., Louise Meintjes, Ana Maria Ochoa, and Thomas Porcello. “Soundscapes: Toward a Sounded Anthropology”. Annual Review of Anthropology 39 (2010): 329–45. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Laurie. “The Eight Animals in Shakespeare; or, Before the Human”. PMLA 124.2 (2009): 472–9. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Jacob. Eco-Sonic Media. Berkeley: U of California P, 2015. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, Jonathan. The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2003. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, David. Literature in the First Media Age: Britain Between the Wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2013. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Tom. “Quia Ego Nominor Leo: Barthes, Stereotypes, and Aesop’s Animals”. Mosaic 40.1 (2007): 45–59. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “If Horses Had Hands…”. Society & Animals 11.3 (2003): 267–81. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westling, Louise. The Logos of the Living World: Merleau-Ponty, Animals, and Language. New York: Fordham UP, 2014. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Wendy. Expecting the Earth: Life/Culture/Biosemiotics. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 2016. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Cary. What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2009. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Animal Rites. American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, Nell. The Wallcreeper. London: Fourth Estate, 2016 [2014]. Print.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben De Bruyn .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Bruyn, B. (2020). Introduction: Multispecies Fictions and Their Acoustic Contact Zones. In: The Novel and the Multispecies Soundscape. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30122-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics