Abstract
This chapter is related to the economic rationale of the ‘Belt and Road’ initiative. One of the crucial aspects of the initiative is its broad impact on the real economy in China by fostering coordination of the developmental policy, stimulating infrastructure development, enhancing trade and investment, reinforcing financial market liberalization, and increasing cooperation between people. The BRI can be compared to the historical ‘Marshall plan,’ which was treated as a solution fostering economic growth and development in Europe after the Second World War. The chapter highlights some similarities and differences between the two initiatives. The BRI project is not only oriented on strengthening the domestic economy, but also at successfully implementing the ‘Going-Out’ strategy aimed at intensifying foreign trade and investments. The chapter also elaborates on some financial aspects of the BRI. Especially important are the means of financing the projects. Some special institutions were created, dedicated for supporting the initiative, like AIIB and Silk Road Fund, but many other ways of financing are described as well, like the private sector, Multinational Development Banks, and others. It is likely that the possibilities and the way in which the BRI will have to be funded in the future will be decisive for its success. The BRI is focused on participation of many countries in the initiative, and the cooperation is very important aspect of the project. Foreign participation enables to develop many infrastructure projects over a long distance such as railways, ports, bridges, and others, which would never be launched without the BRI. Despite many benefits, the initiatives trigger some adverse aspects as well such as the high debts, environmental problems, trade conflicts, and many others. Eventually it is essential that the BRI creates a ‘win-win’ cooperation for all participating countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Following the inaugural Forum in May 2017, President Xi Jinping organized a Second Belt and Road Forum for international cooperation in April 2019. The following topics were discussed here: a more concrete roadmap for the development of Belt and Road; an evaluation of Belt and Road five years later; focus on implications for business; the direction of globalization; and a direct response to criticisms about BRI (see the drawbacks of the BRI).
- 2.
In the current era of new protectionism and declining US hegemony, the BRI is also seen as an alternative approach to a Chinese style of globalization. For some Asian countries such as India, the BRI is considered a hegemonic project that not only challenges the current global order but also seeks to replace it with a Sinocentric.
- 3.
The “16+1 ” group was created by China and CEEC countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Since April 2019 the group “16+1” changed into group “17+1”, as Greece became its member.
References
Ash, M. (2018, October 18). China’s Belt and Road Plan to Reshape the International Order.
Beeson, M., & Li, F. (2016). China’s Place in Regional and Global Governance: A New World Comes into View. Global Policy, 7(4), 491–499.
Cai, P. (2017, March). Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Sydney: Lowy Institute for International Policy.
Chatterjee, B., & Kumar, S. (2017, July 18). Promises and Pitfalls of the Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Pacific Bulletin, No. 388.
Chen, X., & He, Z. (2018, November). 16+1 Cooperation and China–EU Relationship. Budapest: China-CEEC Institute.
China Daily. (2018, March 18). Europe on Path of Expanding Cooperation on BRI.
Choudbury, D. (2017, May 25). UN Warns About Financial Risks in China’s One Belt One Road project. The Economic Times.
Cienski, J. (2011, June 15). Poland to China: You’re Fired. Financial Times.
CIMB Asean Research Institute. (2018, October). China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Southeast Asia. Kuala Lumpur.
Cookson, C. (2019, June 17). Africa to Propel World’s Population Towards 10bn by 2050. Financial Times.
Dadabaev, T. (2018). “Silk Road” as Foreign Policy Discourse: The Construction of Chinese, Japanese and Korean Engagement Strategies in Central Asia. Journal of Euroasian Studies, 9, 30–41.
Deloitte. (2019). BRI Update 2019 - Recalibration and New Opportunities.
Deloitte Insight. (2018). Embracing the BRI Ecosystem in 2018: Navigating Pitfalls and Seizing Opportunities.
Feng, Y., Gabuev, A., Haenle, P., Bin, M., & Trenin, D. (2019, April 8). The Belt and Road Initiative: Views from Washington, Moscow, and Beijing. Beijing: Carnagie-Tsinghua.
Góralczyk, B. (2017). China’s Interests in Central and Eastern Europe: Enter the Dragon. European View, 16(1), 153–162.
Hillman, J. (2018, January 25). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Five Years Later. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
Ho, D. (2017, September 27). Cost of Funding ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ Is Daunting Task. South China Morning Post.
Huang, P., & Liu, Z. (2017). How the 16+1 Cooperation Promotes the Belt and Road Initiative. China-CEEC Think Tank Series. London: Pathe International Ltd.
Hurley, J., Morris, S., & Portelance G. (2018, March). Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from Policy Perspective (CGD Policy Paper No. 121), 15–18.
Kavalski, E., & Mayer, M. (2019). China Is Now a Power in Europe, but Fears of Interference in the EU Are Simplistic and Misguided. The Conversation.
Khan, M. K., Sandero, I. A., Pratt, C. B., & Farid, T. (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Global Model for an Evolving Approach to Sustainable Regional Development. Sustainability, 10(11), 4234.
Královičová, M., & Žatko, M. (2016, August). One Belt One Road Initiative in Central Asia: Implications for Competitiveness of Russian Economy (Working Paper No. 2016/9). Maastricht School of Management.
Krukowska, M. (2016). China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Strategy and Its Implications for the Global World Order. International Business and Global Economy, 35(1), 157–168.
Łasak, P., & van der Linden, R. W. H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative in Tackling China’s Economic Slowdown and Its Financial Implications Within a Policy Trilemma Context, Chapter 12. In E. Gualandri, V. Venturelli, & A. Sclip (Eds.), Frontier Topics in Banking: Investigating New Trends and Recent Developments in the Financial Industry. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
László, G. (2018, May 16). The Effects of the AIIB on the Multilateral Development banks’ System. GAGEO Geopolitikai Kutatóintézet.
Li, L. (2018). China’s Manufacturing Locus in 2025: With a Comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change No. 135.
Li, X. (2019). Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative. International Political Economy Series. Aalborg: Palgrave Mcmillan.
Li, X., & Zeng, K. (2019, March). To Join or Not to Join? State Ownership, Commercial Interests, and China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Pacific Affairs, 92(1), 5–26.
Liu, Z. (2016, October 23). China Ocean Strategic Industry Investment Fund to Promote ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative. Global Times.
Manuel, A. (2017, October 17). China Is Quitely Reshaping the World. The Atlantic.
Misiągiewicz, J., & Misiągiewicz, M. (2016). China’s “One Belt, One Road” Initiative—The Perspective of the European Union. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, XXIII(1), 33.
National Development and Reform Commission. (2015, March 28). Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21-st-Century Maritime Silk Road, National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Commerce of People’s Republic of China, with State Council authorization.
Ndegwa, S. (2019, April 25). Belt and Road Initiative a Global Game-Changer. Business Today.
Ng, N. (2019). The Possible Impact of China’s Belt and Road Agreement with Italy. https://p.dw.com/p/3F4S2.
Nomura. (2018, April 16). Belt and Road: Globalisation, China Style. Global Markets Research Anchor Report.
Northern Trust. (2017). One Belt, One Road: A Global Overview. NTAC: 3NS-20.
Ohashi, H. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the Context of China’s Opening-Up Policy. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 7(2), 85–103.
Parameswaran, P. (2019, May 15). Southeast Asia and China’s Belt and Road Initiative. The Diplomat.
Pepermans, A. (2018). China’s 16+1 and Belt and Road Initiative in Central and Eastern Europe: Economic and Political Influence at a Cheap Price. Journal of Centemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 26(2–3), 181–203.
PwC. (2016, February). China’s New Silk Route: The Long and Winding Road. PwC’s Growth Markets Centre.
Rana, S. (2017, November 15). Pakistan Stops Bid to Include Diamer-Bhasha Dam in CPEC. The Express Tribune. tribune.com.pk.
Richet, X. (2016, May 9–10). The Belt & Road Initiative and EU–China Economic Relations: Trade, Finance, FDI. In Presentation on the Turin Center on Emerging Economies Conference.
Sabine, P. (2017, March 28). Belt and Road is ‘Marshall Plan Without a War’, Analysts Say, as Beijing and Banks Woo Private-Sector Investors. South China Morning Post.
Sajjanhar, A. (2017, November 28). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Prospects and Pitfalls. Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses.
Shen, S., & Chan, W. (2018, March 27). A Comparative Study of the Belt and Road Initiative and the Marshall Plan. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 32.
Stuart-Haentjens, R. (2017, July 6). China and the AIIB on the Belt and Road: Power Sans Control. Global Risk Insights.
Szczudlik, J. (2017, November 30). China’s 16+1 Poses Few Risks to Europe.
Taidong, Z., & Haibing, Z. (2018). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: An Opportunity to Re-energize South-South Cooperation. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 4(4), 559–576.
The Economist. (2016). Our Bulldozers, Our Rules.
The Economist. (2017, May 13). What Is China’s Belt and Road Initiative? The Many Motivations Behind Xi Jinping’s Key Foreign Policy.
The Economist. (2018, July 26). All Under Heaven: China’s Belt-and-Road Plans Are to Be Welcomed—And Worried About.
The Five Main Projects of the Belt and Road Initiative: A Visual Explainer. (2019). South China Morning Post. https://multimedia.scmp.com/news/china/article/One-Belt-One-Road/index.html.
Tracy, E. F., Shvarts, E., Simonov, E., & Babenko, M. (2017). China’s New Eurasian Ambitions: The Environmental Risks of the Silk Road Economic Belt. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(1), 56–88.
Vinels, P. (2018, December 15). Advancing ASEAN’s Digital Economy “East Asia Forum”.
Wang, L. (2019, March 23). China–Africa Cooperation Under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Africa Sees the Way Forward. Global Research.
Wilson, J. (2018). Connecting the Asia-Pacific: Australian Participation in China’s Regional Infrastructure Initiatives. Broadway: Australia–China Relations Institute (ACRI).
Wood, A. J. (2017, August 25). China-Thailand Rail Connection: A Silk Road Tourism Legacy. https://www.eturbonews.com/162675/china-thailand-rail-connection-silk-road-tourism-legacy.
Wuthnow, J. (2017). Chinese Perspectives on the Belt Road Initiative: Strategic Rationales, Risks, and Implications. Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Institute for National Strategic Studies, “China Strategic Perspectives”, No. 12.
Xu, S., & Chen, L. (2019, August 15). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Recalibration and New Opportunities. Deloitte Insights.
Yongquan, L. (2018). The Greater Eurasian Partnership and the Belt and Road Initiative: Can the Two Be Linked? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 94–99.
Zakić, K., & Tešić, K. (2018). Managing Regional Development in CEE Countries – The Example of Initiative 16+1. Progress in Economic Sciences, 5, 95–109.
Zhang, Y. (2019, April 7). Ice Silk Road Framework Welcomed by Countries, Sets New Direction for Arctic Cooperation. Global Times.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Łasak, P., van der Linden, R.W.H. (2019). The Rationale for the ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative. In: The Financial Implications of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30118-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30118-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30117-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30118-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)