Skip to main content

Analyzing Vegetation–Soil–Topography Relationships of Landscapes: A Multiscale Geosystem Approach and Its Application

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 884 Accesses

Part of the book series: Innovations in Landscape Research ((ILR))

Abstract

Most landscape-ecological models deal with either between-component relationships at a single hierarchical level or with hierarchy of a single geocomponent, often ignoring variety of types of between-component relationships and density of linkages in space. We developed the multiscale geosystem approach to clarify the relations between landscape attributes, governing ecological processes, and relevant scale levels of processes description. We treat landscape as a multipattern geosystem that is composed by superposition of spatial relationships formed at several scale levels and reflecting various contemporary ecological processes as well as legacy of former processes and geographical phenomena. We propose the procedure that allows comparison of a series of hypotheses about the appropriate spatial extent of the higher-order system, i.e., the extent to which the focal system responds to constraint. Constraints from the higher-order system are interpreted as an emergent effect evolving as a result of interactions between neighboring spatial units. The properties of a landscape unit are treated as a product of both intra-level interactions between geocomponents and inter-level relations with a set of surrounding units. The proposed statistical procedure is aimed at splitting spatial variance of geocomponents’ (soils and vegetation) properties to effects of inter-level and intra-level interactions. Non-metric multidimensional scaling was applied to reduce dimensionality of raw field data collected in Republic of Udmurtia (mixed-forests zone) and to range ecological factors affecting vegetation and soil properties. Response surface regression models were applied to relate properties of soils and vegetation to each other and to a set of relief morphometric properties measured from digital elevation model in a range of square neighborhoods. Comparison of quality of equations built for various neighborhoods allowed establishing the size of holistic higher-order geosystems that impose frame conditions on properties of the focus-level units. We revealed contemporary and former-time processes that shaped patterns of vegetation and soil cover and their characteristic space scale. The proposed approach is scale-invariant and can be applied to study of relations between the focus-level units and the higher-order units at any map resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Soils here and below are named according to IUSS (2015).

References

  • Angelstam P, Grodzynskyi M, Andersson K, Axelsson R, ElbakidzeM Khoroshev A, Kruhlov I, Naumov V (2013) Measurement, collaborative learning and research for sustainable use of ecosystem services: landscape concepts and Europe as laboratory. AMBIO 42:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, Grunewald K, Khoroshev AV (2015) The significance of geosystem and landscape concepts for the assessment of ecosystem services: exemplified on a case study in Russia. Landscape Ecol 30(7):1145–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Wu X, Archer SR (2005) Scale-dependent influence of topography-based hydrologic features on patterns of woody plant encroachment in savanna landscapes. Landscape Ecol 20:733–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA, Huettmann F (eds) (2010) Spatial complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation. Springer, Tokyo, p 458

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (2006) Land mosaics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 632

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon S, Charlton M (2002) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, 269 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham AS, Yang W, Kang W (2017) Multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR). Ann Am Assoc Geogr 107(6):1247–1265

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay GJ, Dube P, Bouchard A, Marceau DJ (2002) A scale-space primer for exploring and quantifying complex landscapes. Ecol Model 153:27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome, 192 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoroshev A (2010) Multilevel analysis of landscape structure for land use decisions. In: Barančoková M, Krajčí J, Kollár J, Belčáková I (eds) Landscape ecology—methods, applications and interdisciplinary approach. Bratislava, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, pp 99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoroshev AV, Merekalova KA (2006) Uncertainty of relations between landscape components—a tool for modelling evolution of spatial pattern. Ekológia (Bratislava) 25(Suppl. 1):122–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoroshev AV, Merekalova KA, Aleshchenko GM (2007) Multiscale organization of intercomponent relations in landscape. In: Dyakonov KN, Kasimov NS, Khoroshev AV, Kushlin AV (eds) Landscape analysis for sustainable development. Theory and applications of landscape science in Russia. Alex Publishers, Moscow, pp 93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange O (1965) Wholes and parts: a general theory of system behavior. Pergamon Press, 74 p

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon G, Wiken EB, Gauthier DA (2004) Toward a scientifically rigorous basis for developing mapped ecological regions. Environ Manage 34(1):111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV (1988) Hierarchy theory and global change. In: Rosswall T, Woodmansee RG, Risser PG (eds) SCOPE 35. scales and global change: spatial and temporal variability in biospheric and geospheric processes. Wiley, UK, pp 29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD (1999) Divergence, convergence and self-organization in landscapes. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 89(3):466–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reteyum AYu (1972) Physical-geographical studies and system approach. In: System studies. Nauka, Moscow, pp 90–110 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sochava VB (1978) Introduction to the theory of geosystems. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 320 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M, Gardner RH (2015) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Pattern and process. Springer, Berlin, p 482

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gigch JP (1974) Applied general systems theory. Harper & Row Publishers, New York, p 439

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, David JL (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modelling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model 153:7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Jelinski DE, Luck M, Tueller PT (2000) Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geogr Inf Sci 6:6–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR projects 17-05-00447). The contribution of Ksenia Merekalova and Roman Bekkiev to field research is greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander V. Khoroshev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khoroshev, A.V. (2019). Analyzing Vegetation–Soil–Topography Relationships of Landscapes: A Multiscale Geosystem Approach and Its Application. In: Mueller, L., Eulenstein, F. (eds) Current Trends in Landscape Research. Innovations in Landscape Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30069-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics