Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Landscape Approach Through Evaluation: Opportunities for Pan-European Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Current Trends in Landscape Research

Part of the book series: Innovations in Landscape Research ((ILR))

Abstract

Sustainable development as a societal process aimed at securing sustainability is challenging. To encourage the necessary knowledge production and learning in different social-ecological contexts requires a place-based networking research infrastructure that involves multiple academic disciplines and non-academic actors. Long-term socio-ecological research (LTSER) platform is one approach with ~80 initiatives globally. To encourage transdisciplinary learning through evaluation we defined a normative model for ideal performance at both local platform and network levels. Four surveys were then sent out to 67 self-reported LTSER platforms. Focusing on the network level, we analyzed the spatial distribution of both long-term ecological monitoring sites within LTSER platforms, and LTSER platforms across the European continent. Finally, narrative biographies about 18 LTSER platforms in different stages of development were analyzed. While the siting of LTSER platforms represented biogeographical regions well, variations in land-use history and governance arrangements were poorly represented. Ecosystem research (72%) dominated social system research (28%). Maintenance of a platform required 3–5 staff members, was based mainly on national funding and had 1–2 years of future funding secured. Networking with other landscape approach concepts was common. Individually, and as a network, LTSER platforms have good potential for transdisciplinary knowledge production and learning about sustainability challenges. To benefit from the large range of variation among Pan-European social-ecological systems, we encourage collaboration among different landscape approach concepts such as LTSER platform and Model Forest, ecological reference landscapes like zapovedniks as well as traditional systems for landscape stewardship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angelstam P, Barnes G, Elbakidze M, Marsh A, Marais C, Mills A, Polonsky S, Richardson DM, Rivers N, Shackleton R, Stafford W (2017a) Collaborative learning to unlock investments for functional ecological infrastructure: bridging barriers in social-ecological systems in South Africa. Ecosyst Serv 27:291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Elbakidze M (2017) Forest landscape stewardship for functional green infrastructures in Europe’s West and East: diagnosing and treating social-ecological systems. In: Bieling C, Plieninger T (eds) The science and practice of landscape stewardship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 124–144

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Elbakidze M, Axelsson R, Khoroshev A, Tysiachniouk M, Pedroli B, Tysiachniouk M, Zabubenin E (2019a) Model forests in Russia as landscape approach: demonstration projects or initiatives for learning towards sustainable forest management? Forest Policy Econ 101:96–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Grodzynskyi M, Andersson K, Axelsson R, Elbakidze M, Khoroshev A, Kruhlov I, Naumov V (2013) Measurement, collaborative learning and research for sustainable use of ecosystem services: landscape concepts and Europe as laboratory. Ambio 42(2):129–145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Manton M, Elbakidze M, Sijtsma F, Adamescu M, Avni N, Beja P, Bezak P, Zyablikova I, Cruz F, Bretagnolle V, Díaz-Delgado R, Ens B, Fedoriak M, Flaim G, Gingrich S, Lavi-Neeman M, Medinets S, Melecis V, Muñoz-Rojas J, Schäckermann J, Stocker-Kiss A, Setälä H, Stryamets N, Taka M, Tallec G, Tappeiner U, Törnblom J, Yamelynets T (2019b) LTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure: learning landscape approach through evaluation. Landscape Ecol On-line 34:1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0737-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Munoz-Rojas J, Pinto-Correia T (2019c) Landscape interpretations and landscape approach initiatives can foster knowledge production and learning that sustain multiple ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol 34(7): 1445–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00866-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Törnblom J (2004) Maintaining forest biodiversity in actual landscapes—European gradients in history and governance systems as a “landscape lab”. In: Marchetti M (ed) Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe—from ideas to operationality. European Forest Institute, symposium No 51. pp 299–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Manton M, Pedersen S, Elbakidze M (2017b) Disrupted trophic interactions affect recruitment of boreal deciduous and coniferous trees in northern Europe. Ecol Appl 27(4):1108–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Angelstam P, Roberge J-M, Lõhmus A, Bergmanis M, Brazaitis G, Dönz-Breuss M, Edenius L, Kosinski Z, Kurlavicius P, Lārmanis V, Lūkins M, Mikusinski G, Račinskis E, Strazds M, Tryjanowski P (2004) Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation—a review of parameters for focal forest birds. Ecol Bull 51:427–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson R, Angelstam P, Elbakidze M, Stryamets N, Johansson K-E (2011) Sustainable development and sustainability: landscape approach as a practical interpretation of principles and implementation concepts. J Landscape Ecol 4(3):5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson R, Angelstam P, Myhrman L, Sädbom S, Ivarsson M, Elbakidze M, Andersson K, Cupa P, Diry C, Doyon F, Drotz MK, Hjorth A, Hermansson JO, Kullberg T, Lickers FH, McTaggart J, Olsson A, Pautov Yu, Svensson L, Törnblom J (2013) Evaluation of multi-level social learning for sustainable landscapes: perspective of a development initiative in Bergslagen, Sweden. AMBIO 42(2):241–253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baker S (2006) Sustainable development. Routledge, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bretagnolle V, Berthet E, Gross N, Gauffre B, Plumejeaud C, Houte S, Badenhausser I, Monceaua K, Allier F, Monestiez P, Gaba S (2018) Towards sustainable and multifunctional agriculture in farmland landscapes: lessons from the integrative approach of a French LTSER platform. Sci Total Environ 627:822–834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson L, Elbakidze M, Angelstam P, Gordon J (2017) Governance and management dynamics of landscape restoration at multiple scales: learning from successful environmental managers in Sweden. J Environ Manage 197:24–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dick J, Orenstein DE, Holzer JM, Wohner C, Achard AL, Andrews C, Avriel-Avni N, Beja P, Blond N, CabelloJ Chen C, Díaz-DelgadoR Giannakis GV, Gingrich S, Izakovicova Z, Krauze K, Lamouroux N, LecaS MelecisV, Miklós K, Mimikou M, Niedrist G, Piscart C, Postolache C, Psomas A, Santos-Reis M, Tappeiner U, Vanderbilt K, Van Ryckegem G (2018) What is socio-ecological research delivering? A literature survey across 25 international LTSER platforms. Sci Total Environ 622:1225–1240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duckett D, Feliciano D, Martin-Ortega J, Munoz-Rojas J (2016) Tackling wicked environmental problems: the discourse and its influence on practice in Scotland. Landscape Urban Plann 154:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbakidze M, Angelstam P, Sandström C, Axelsson R (2010) Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest initiatives: adaptive governance towards sustainable forest management? Ecol Soc 15(2):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbakidze M, Hahn T, Mauerhofer V, Angelstam P, Axelsson R (2013) Legal framework for biosphere reserves as learning sites for sustainable development: a comparative analysis of Ukraine and Sweden. Ambio 42(2):174–187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) Green Infrastructure (GI)—Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. COM 249. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedoriak MM, Angelstam PK, Kulmanov OL, Tymochko LI, Rudenko SS, Volkov RS (2019) Ukraine is moving forward from ‘Undiscovered honey land’ to active participation in international monitoring of honey bee colony losses. BeeWorld. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2018.1554279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman E, Peltola T (2013) Developing socio-ecological research in Finland: challenges and progress towards a thriving LTSER network. In: Singh SJ, Haberl H, Chertow M, Mirtl M, Schmid M (eds) Long term socio-ecological research (LTSER). Springer, Dordrecht, pp 443–459

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich S, Schmid M, Dirnböck T, Dullinger I, Garstenauer R, Gaube V, Haberl H, Kainz M, Kreiner D, Mayer R, Mirtl M, Sass O, Schauppenlehner T, Stocker-Kiss A, Martin W (2016) Long-term socio-ecological research in practice: lessons from inter-and transdisciplinary research in the Austrian Eisenwurzen. Sustainability 8(8):743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove JM, Pickett STA, Whitmer A, Cadenasso ML (2013) Building and urban LTSER: the case of the Baltimore ecosystem study and the D.C./B.C., ULTRA-Ex project. In: Singh JS, Haberl H, Schmid M, Mirtl M, Chertow M (eds) Long term socio-ecological research studies in society nature interactions across temporal and spatial scales. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 369–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Gaube V, Díaz-Delgado R, Krauze K, Neuner A, Peterseil J, Plutzar C, Singh SJ, Vadineanu A (2009) Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressures and impacts. A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms. Ecol Econ 68:1797–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Winiwarter V, Andersson K, Ayres RU, Boone C, Castillo A, Cunfer G, Fischer-Kowalski M, Freudenburg WR, Furman E, Kaufmann R, Krausmann F, Langthaler E, Lotze-Campen H, Mirtl M, Redman CL, Reenberg A, Wardell A, Warr B, Zechmeister H (2006) From LTER to LTSER: conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research. Ecol Soc 11(2):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer JM, Carmon N, Orenstein DE (2018) A methodology for evaluating transdisciplinary research on coupled socio-ecological systems. Ecol Ind 85:808–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMFN (2008) Model forest development guide. International Model Forest Network Secretariat, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Lähteenmäki-Smith K (ed) (2007) Learning through evaluation: the Nordic experience. Nordregion Report 2007:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11(4):849–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Covelo

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindelöw D (2018) Running to stand still—the role of travel time in transport planning. SWECO, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton M, Angelstam P (2018) Defining benchmarks for restoration of green infrastructure: a case study combining the historical range of variability of habitat and species’ requirements. Sustainability 10:326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R, Selman P (2006) Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. J Agric Econ 57(2):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger MJ, Bunce RGH, Van Eupen M, Mirtl M (2010) An assessment of long term ecosystem research activities across European socio-ecological gradients. J Environ Manage 91(6):1357–1365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirtl M, Borer ET, Djukic I, Forsius M, Haubold H, Hugo W, Jourdan J, Lindenmayer D, McDowell WH, Muraoka H, Orenstein DE, Pauw JC, Peterseil J, Shibata H, Wohner C, Yu X, Haase P (2018) Genesis, goals and achievements of long-term ecological research at the global scale: a critical review of ILTER and future directions. Sci Total Environ 626:1439–1462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirtl M, Frenzel M, Furman E, Ohl C, Krauze K, Grünbühel C (2008) LTER-EUROPE: Criteria and recommendations. Version 5.2, 2008-05-27. Retrieved from http://www.lter-europe.net/document-archive/central/I3034v02-LTER-Europe-Criteria.pdf

  • Mirtl M, Orenstein DE, Wildenberg M, Peterseil J, Frenzel M (2013) Development of LTSER platforms in LTER-Europe: challenges and experiences in implementing place-based long-term socio-ecological research in selected regions. In: Singh SJ, Haberl H, Chertow M, Mirtl M, Schmid M (eds) Long term socio-ecological research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 409–442

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert F, Martinelli F, Swyngedouw E, Gonzales S (2005) Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Stud 42(11):1969–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naumov V, Manton M, Elbakidze M, Rendenieks Z, Priedniek J, Uglyanets S, Yamelynets T, Zhivotov A, Angelstam P (2018) How to reconcile wood production and biodiversity conservation? The Pan-European boreal forest history gradient as an “experiment”. J Environ Manage 218:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neumeier S (2012) Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research?—Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1):48–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primdahl J, Kristensen L, Arler F, Angelstam P, Aagaard Christensen A, Elbakidze M (2018) Rural landscape governance and expertise—on landscape agents and democracy. In: Egoz S, Jorgensen K, Ruggeri D (eds) Defining landscape democracy: a path to spatial justice. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberge J-M, Angelstam P, Villard M-A (2008) Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests—deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning. Biol Cons 141:997–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Margules C, Boedhihartono AK, Dale A, Sunderland T, Supriatna J, Saryanthi R (2015) Landscape approaches, what are the pre-conditions for success? Sustain Sci 10(2):345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shtilmark F (2003) History of the Russian zapovedniks. Russian Nature Press, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SJ, Haberl H, Chertow M, Mirtl M, Schmid M (eds) (2013) Introduction. In: Singh SJ, Haberl H, Chertow M, Mirtl M, Schmid M (Eds) Long term socio-ecological research: studies in society-nature interactions across spatial and temporal scales. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow CP (1959) The two cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24(8):1037–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from EU Horizon 2020 for the research infrastructure project eLTER, FORMAS (project number 2017:1342) and to the Lithuanian Science Council [grant number P-MIP-17-210] for the FunGILT project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School for Forest Management, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), PO Box 43, 73921, Skinnskatteberg, Sweden

    Per Angelstam

  2. Faculty of Forest Science and Ecology, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentu g. 13, 53362, Akademija, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Michael Manton

  3. Sustainable Forest Management Research Institute, University of Valladolid, Campus de la Yutera. Av. de Madrid 44, 34071, Palencia, Spain

    Fatima Cruz

  4. Department of Ecology and Biomonitoring, Chernivtsi National University, 2 Kotsyubynski street, Chernivtsi, 58029, Ukraine

    Mariia Fedoriak

  5. Silver Taiga Foundation for Sustainable Development, PO Box 810, 167000, Syktyvkar, Russia

    Yurij Pautov

Authors
  1. Per Angelstam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Manton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatima Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mariia Fedoriak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yurij Pautov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Angelstam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Guest Scientist, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Brandenburg, Germany

    Lothar Mueller

  2. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Brandenburg, Germany

    Frank Eulenstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Angelstam, P., Manton, M., Cruz, F., Fedoriak, M., Pautov, Y. (2019). Learning Landscape Approach Through Evaluation: Opportunities for Pan-European Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research. In: Mueller, L., Eulenstein, F. (eds) Current Trends in Landscape Research. Innovations in Landscape Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30069-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation