Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Current Trends in Landscape Research pp 253–285Cite as

Ecosystem Services of Russian Landscapes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 922 Accesses

Part of the book series: Innovations in Landscape Research ((ILR))

Abstract

Russian landscapes provide important ecosystem services (ES) of local, regional and global scale and are crucially important for the economy and people of the country. The Project TEEB-Russia is the first attempt at a nation-wide ES assessment in Russia. The result of the first phase of the project (2013–2015) was the “Prototype National Report on Ecosystem Services of Russia, Volume 1, Terrestrial Ecosystems Services.” A methodology for ES assessment was developed with allowance for the current status of the national public statistics. ES volumes supplied by ecosystems and consumed by humans were assessed. The degree of ES use was assessed by the ratio of supplied ES to consumed ES. These methodological approaches allowed to compare the regions of Russia and define regions, which are ES donors and ES consumers. However, further progress in defining the principles of ES management requires moving from the interregional to landscape scale. In particular, the optimization of the tasks of biodiversity conservation and ES use can be effectively solved at the landscape level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The cadastre is the report of Russia on greenhouse gas emission/absorption and the GHG balance in managed forests. Carbon stocks in forests are intermediate estimates of the cadaster (National report 2013).

References

  • Allan E, Manning P, Alt F, Binkenstein J, Blaser S, Blüthgen N, Böhm S, Grassein F, Hölzel N, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Morris EK, Oelmann Y, Prati D, Renner SC, Rillig MC, Schaefer M, Schloter M, Schmitt B, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Solly E, Sorkau E, Steckel J, Steffen-Dewenter I, Stempfhuber B, Tschapka M, Weiner CN, Weisser WW, Werner M, Westphal C, Wilcke W, Fischer M (2015) Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol Lett 18(8):834–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12469. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson BJ, Armsworth PR, Eigenbrod F, Thomas CD, Gillings S, Heinemeyer A, Roy DB, Gaston KJ (2009) Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J Appl Ecol 46:888–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01666.x. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad KJ, Johnson GW, Voigt B, Villa F (2013) Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosyst Serv 4:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH (2014) Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515: 505–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13855. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartalev SA, Belvard AS, Ershov DV, Isaev AS (2003) A new SPOT4- VEGETATION derived land cover map of Northern Eurasia. Int J Remote Sens 24(9):1977–1982. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000066297. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruffo M, Schmid B, Bruelheide H, Chi X, Hector A, Ma K, Michalski S, Tang Z, Niklaus PA (2013) Biodiversity promotes tree growth during succession in subtropical forest. PLoS One 8 (11):e81246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081246. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basanets LP, Drozdov AV (2006) Nature management for tourism, ecological imperative and prospects of Russia. In: Nature management and sustainable development. World Ecosystems and Problems of Russia. KMK—Association of The Scientific Publications, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruffo M, Schmid B, Bruelheide H, Chi X, Hector A, Ma K, Michalski S, Tang Z, Niklaus PA (2013) Biodiversity promotes tree growth during succession in subtropical forest. PLoS One 8 (11):e81246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081246. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva E (2014a) Die globale Bedeutung der russischen Ökosystemfunktionen und das Problem der unterschiedlichen Skalen von Ökosystemdienstleistungen, pp 93–126. In: Grunewald K, Bastian O, Drozdov A (eds) TEEB-Prozesse und Ökosystem-Assessment in Deutschland, Russland und weiteren Staaten des nördlichen Eurasiens. BfN-Skripten 372, Bonn (in German and Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva E (2014b) Ein erster Indikatorensatz zur Bestimmung des Status von Regionen als Bereitsteller bzw. Empfänger von ÖSD in verschiedenen räumlichen Maßstäben, pp 50–65. In: Grunewald K, Bastian O, Drozdov A, Grabowsky V (eds) Erfassung und Bewertung von Ökosystemdienstleistungen (ÖSD)—Erfahrungen, insbesondere aus Deutschland und Russland. BfN-Skripten 373, Bonn (in German and Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva E (2014c) The summary of the principle of optimal diversity of biosystems. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 52 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva E (2018) The optimal biodiversity—a new dimension of landscape assessment. Ecol Indic 94(2):6–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.041. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva E, Aleshchenko G (2013) The principle of optimum diversity of biosystems. KMK—Association of The Scientific Publications, Moscow, 522 p (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva E, Zamolodchikov D, Grunewald K (2019) National assessment of ecosystem services in Russia: Methodology and main problems. Sci Total Environ 655(2019):1181–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.286. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva E, Zamolodchikov D, Kraev G, Grunewald K, Narykov A (2017) Supplied, demanded and consumed ecosystem services: Prospects for national assessment in Russia. Ecol Indic 78:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.034. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva EN, Grunewald K, Bobylev SN, Zamolodchikov DG, Zimenko AV Bastian O (2015) The current state of knowledge of ecosystems and ecosystem services in Russia: a status report. AMBIO 44(6):491–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0674-4. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bukvareva EN, Zamolodchikov DG (eds) (2018) Ecosystem services of Russia: Prototype National Report, vol. 1. Terrestrial ecosystems services. Adapted English version of the report, originally published in Russian in 2016. BCC Press, Moscow, 148 p. Available at: http://www.biodiversity.ru/programs/ecoservices/first-steps/Ecosystem-Services-Russia_V1_eng_web.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Muller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indicators 21:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F (2014) Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands—Concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online 34:1–32. https://doi.org/10.3097/lo.201434. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486(7401):59–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casalegno S, Inger R, Desilvey C, Gaston KJ (2013) Spatial covariance between aesthetic value & other ecosystem services. PLoS One 8(6):e68437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068437. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh KC, Gosnell JS, Davis SL, Ahumada J, Boundja P, Clark DB, Mugerwa B, Jansen PA, O’Brien TG, Rovero F, Sheil D, Vasquez R, Andelman S (2014) Carbon storage in tropical forests correlates with taxonomic diversity and functional dominance on a global scale. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:563–573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12143. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Concept of the development of the system of nature protected areas of federal importance until 2020. Approved by the Government of the Russian Federation of December 22, 2011 No. 2322 p. Moscow (In Russian). Available at: http://government.ru/docs/4281/ Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  • Costanza R (2008) Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol Conserv 141:350–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunford RW, Harrison PA, Bagstad KJ (2017) Computer modelling for ecosystem service assessment. In: Burkhard B, Maes J (eds) Mapping ecosystem services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, pp 124–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoshina TL (2005) Non-wood plant resources of Russia. NIA-Nature, Moscow, 80 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA (2015) Ecosystem services–biodiversity relationships depend on land use type in floodplain agroecosystems. Land Use Policy 46:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.003. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsman A, Wennersten L (2016) Inter-individual variation promotes ecological success of populations and species: evidence from experimental and comparative studies. Ecography 39:630–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01357. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsman A (2014) Effects of genotypic and phenotypic variation on establishment are important for conservation, invasion and infection biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 111:302–307. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317745111. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB, Anderson TM, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Hautier Y, Hillebrand H, Lind EM, Pärtel M, Bakker JD, Buckley YM, Crawley MJ, Damschen EI, Davies KF, Fay PA, Firn J, Gruner DS, Hector A, Knops JM, MacDougall AS, Melbourne BA, Morgan JW, Orrock JL, Prober SM, Smith MD (2016) Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature 529:390–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature16524. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross K, Cardinale BJ, Fox JW, Gonzalez A, Loreau M, Polley HW, Reich PB, van Ruijven J (2014) Species richness and the temporal stability of biomass production: a new analysis of recent biodiversity experiments. Am Nat 183:1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/673915. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald K, Bastian O, Drozdov A (eds) (2014a) TEEB-Prozesse und Ökosystem-Assessment in Deutschland, Russland und weiteren Staaten des nördlichen Eurasiens. BfN-Skripten 372, Bonn (in German and Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald K, Bastian O, Drozdov A, Grabowsky V (eds) (2014b) Erfassung und Bewertung von Ökosystemdienstleistungen (ÖSD) – Erfahrungen, insbesondere aus Deutschland und Russland. BfN-Skripten 373, Bonn (in German and Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunewald K, Zimenko A, Bastian O, Bukvareva E, Grigorian A, Wende W (2014c) Konzeption des Projektes, pp 146–161. In: Grunewald K, Bastian O, Drozdov A (eds) TEEB-Prozesse und Ökosystem-Assessment in Deutschland, Russland und weiteren Staaten des nördlichen Eurasiens. BfN-Skripten 372, Bonn (in German and Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gryaznov SE, Kuzminyh YV, Bogachev YK (2011) Assessment and measurement of illegal logging in the forest sector of the Russian Federation. News of Higher education institutions. Forest Journal 5:124–130 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2013) Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): consultation on Version 4, August–December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No. EEA/IEA/09/003

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa IT, Aerts R, Berendse F, Berg MP, Bruder A, Butenschoen O, Chauvet E, Gessner MO, Jabiol J, Makkonen M, McKie BG, Malmqvist B, Peeters ET, Scheu S, Schmid B, van Ruijven J, Vos VC, Hättenschwiler S (2014) Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes. Nature 509:218–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13247. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PA, Berry PM, Simpson G, Haslett JR, Blicharska M, Bucur M, Dunford R, Egoh B, Garcia-Llorente M, Geamănă N, Geertsema W, Lommelen E, Meiresonne L, Turkelboom F (2014) Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosyst Serv 9:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedden-Dunkhorst B, Braat L, Wittmer H (2015) TEEB emerging at the country level: Challenges and opportunities. Ecosyst Serv 14:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.007. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, Matulich KL, Gonzalez A, Duffy JE, Gamfeldt L, O’Connor MI (2012) A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486:105–108. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11118Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AR, Inouye BD, Johnson MTJ, Underwood N, Vellend M (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 11:609–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King E, Cavender-Bares J, Balvanera P, Mwampamba TH, Polasky S (2015) Trade-offs in ecosystem services and varying stakeholder preferences: Evaluating conflicts, obstacles, and opportunities. Ecol Soc 20(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07822-200325 Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  • Kotlobay A, Lopina O, Kharchenkov Yu, Bryukhanov A, Schegolev A, Smirnov D (2006) Evaluation of timber of doubtful origin and analysis of the practice of introducing systems for tracing the origin of wood in a number of multi-forest regions of the North-West, Siberia and the Far East of Russia. WWF, Moscow, 56 p (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowska AM, Biermann A, Borer ET, Cebrián-Piqueras MA, Declerck SA, De Meester L, Van Donk E, Gamfeldt L, Gruner DS, Hagenah N, Harpole WS, Kirkman KP, Klausmeier CA, Kleyer M, Knops JM, Lemmens P, Lind EM, Litchman E, Mantilla-Contreras J, Martens K, Meier S, Minden V, Moore JL, Venterink HO, Seabloom EW, Sommer U, Striebel M, Trenkamp A, Trinogga J, Urabe J, Vyverman W, Van de Waal DB, Widdicombe CE, Hillebrand H (2016) The influence of balanced and imbalanced resource supply on biodiversity functioning relationship across ecosystems. Philos Trans R Soc B 371:20150283. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0283. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomanova NV et al (eds) (2011) The state of game resources in the Russian Federation in 2008–2010: Information-analytical materials. Game animals of Russia (biology, protection, resource management, rational use). Issue 9. Phys. Culture, Moscow, 219 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Paracchini ML, Zulian GA (2011) European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services. Towards an atlas of ecosystem services, Publ Office EU, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Dunbar MB, Alkemade R (2012) Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol Conserv 155:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre FT, Quero JL, Gotelli NJ, Escudero A, Ochoa V, Delgado-Baquerizo M, García-Gómez M, Bowker MA, Soliveres S, Escolar C, García-Palacios P, Berdugo M, Valencia E, Gozalo B, Gallardo A, Aguilera L, Arredondo T, Eldridge DJ, Espinosa CI, Florentino A, Gaitán J, Gatica MG, Ghiloufi W, Gómez-González S, Gutiérrez JR, Hernández RM, Huang X, Huber-Sannwald E, Jankju M, Miriti M, Monerris J, Mau RL, Morici E, Naseri K, Ospina A, Polo V, Prina A, Pucheta E, Ramírez-Collantes DA, Romao R, Tighe M, Torres-Díaz C, Val J, Veiga JP, Wang D, Zaady E (2012) Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335:214–218. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215442. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Harms M-J Balvanera P (2012) Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosys Serv Manage 8:1–2, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.663792. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis (2005) Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadrowski K, Wirth C, Scherer-Lorenzen M (2010) Is forest diversity driving ecosystem function and service? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.003. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Atlas of Russia. Volumes 1–4. (2004–2008). Federal Agency for Geodesy and Cartography of Russia, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Report (2013) National Report of the Russian Federation on the Cadastre of Anthropogenic Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks of Greenhouse Gases Not Controlled by the Montreal Protocol for 1990–2011 (2013) Moscow, 421 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Strategy of Biodiversity Conservation in Russia (2001) RAS, Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia, GEF Project “Conservation of Biodiversity”, Moscow, 75 p (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedkov S, Burkhard B (2012) Flood regulating ecosystem services – Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecol Indic 21:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquette A, Messier C (2011) The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00592.x. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ptichnikov A, Kuritsyn A (2011) Systems for tracing wood in Russia: the experience of timber companies and forest management bodies. Analytical report. WWF of Russia, Moscow, 116 p (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu J, Turner MG (2013) Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. PNAS 110(29):12149–12154. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310539110. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(11):5242–5247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosstat (2013) Regions of Russia. Socioeconomic indicators. Statistical Bull. Moscow (in Russian). Available at: www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1138623506156. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  • Schulp CJE, Burkhard B, Maes J, Van Vliet J, Verburg PH (2014) Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: a comparison on the European scale. PLoS One 9(10):e109643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109643. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Science for Environment Policy (2015) Ecosystem Services and the Environment. In-depth Report 11 produced for the European Commission, DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. https://doi.org/10.2779/57695. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  • Stolbovoi V, McCallum I (2002). Land Resources of Russia (CD-ROM). International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis and the Russian Academy of Science, Laxenburg, Austria: Available at: http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/FOR/russia_cd/guide.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  • Stürck J, Poortinga A, Verburg PH (2014) Mapping ecosystem services: The supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe. Ecol Indic 38:198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syrbe R-U, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indicators 21:80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2019) http://www.teebweb.org/areas-of-work/country-studies-home/. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

  • Tilman D, Reich PB, Isbell F (2012) Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:10394–10397. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208240109. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Isbell F, Cowles JM (2014) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Ann Rev of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 45(1):471–493. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091917. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkelboom F, Leone M, Jacobs S, Kelemen E, García-Llorente M, Baró F, Termansen M, Barton DN, Berry P, Stange E, Thoonen M, Kalóczkai Á, Vadineanu A, Castro AJ, Czúcz B, Röckmann C, Wurbs D, Odee D, Preda E, Gómez-Baggethun E, Rusch GM, MartínezPastur G, Palomo I, Dick J, Casaer J, Dijk J, Priess JA, Langemeyer J, Mustajoki J, Kopperoinen L, Baptist MJ, Peri PL, Mukhopadhyay R, Aszalós R, Roy SB, Luque S, Rusch V (2018) When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. Ecosyst Serv 29:566–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vihervaara P, Mononen L, Santos F, Adamescu M, Cazacu C, Luque S, Geneletti D, Maes J (2017) Biophysical quantification. In: Burkhard B, Maes J (eds) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, pp 95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Carrillo-Gavilán A, Vayreda J, Bugmann H, Fridman J, Grodzki W, Haase J, Kunstler G, Schelhaas MJ, Trasobares A (2013) Disentangling biodiversity and climatic determinants of wood production. PLoS ONE 8(2):e3530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053530. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Lei X, Ma Z, Kneeshaw DD, Peng C (2011) Positive relationship between aboveground carbon stocks and structural diversity in spruce-dominated forest stands in New Brunswick. Canada. Forest Sci 57(6):506–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulian G, Polce C, Maes J (2014) ESTIMAP: A GIS-based model to map ecosystem services in the European Union. Ann Bot (Roma) 4:1–7. https://doi.org/10.4462/annbotrm-11807. Accessed 15 Jan 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

The TEEB-Russia project was commissioned by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) with funds from the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU) and was supported by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biodiversity Conservation Center, Vavilova Street 41, Office 2, 117312, Moscow, Russia

    Elena Bukvareva

  2. Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, d. 1, str. 12, 119234, Moscow, Russia

    Dmitry Zamolodchikov

  3. Centre for Ecology and Productivity of Forests of Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsouznaya Street, 84/32, 117997, Moscow, Russia

    Dmitry Zamolodchikov

  4. Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Weberplatz 1, 01217, Dresden, Germany

    Karsten Grunewald

Authors
  1. Elena Bukvareva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dmitry Zamolodchikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karsten Grunewald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Bukvareva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Guest Scientist, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Brandenburg, Germany

    Lothar Mueller

  2. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Brandenburg, Germany

    Frank Eulenstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bukvareva, E., Zamolodchikov, D., Grunewald, K. (2019). Ecosystem Services of Russian Landscapes. In: Mueller, L., Eulenstein, F. (eds) Current Trends in Landscape Research. Innovations in Landscape Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30069-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation