Abstract
In representative democracies public opinions matter. In this chapter we analyse the preferences for an Unconditional Basic Income (UBI) among a large, representative sample of people in the 28 member states of the European Union (EU). The survey data were collected by online sampling on mobile devices in March 2017. We apply a multi-level ordered logit model and a fixed effects model. On average, almost three-quarters of the people in the EU stated to (probably) vote for the introduction of UBI, if there would be a referendum on introducing UBI. Half of the voters would like to see UBI being introduced after successful experiments in their own country or abroad; one third as soon as possible. The likelihood to vote in favour of UBI varies significantly between groups of people. The effect of awareness on preferences is inconclusive. The national macro-economic and welfare state contexts have significant effects. “It reduces anxiety about financial basic needs” is considered the most convincing argument for UBI. “It might encourage people to stop working” is considered the most convincing argument against UBI. The self-enhancement hypothesis is confirmed. The positive and negative effects of UBI on individual work choices balance out.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Based on a metaphor used by Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman five decades ago: “Let us suppose now that one day a helicopter flies over this community and drops an additional $1000 in bills from the sky, which is, of course, hastily collected by members of the community .” (Friedman, 1969: 4).
- 2.
PPS is a common currency used by Eurostat, the statistical office of the EU , to eliminate the differences in price levels between the EU countries allowing meaningful volume comparisons of national social security expenditure.
- 3.
The Dalia Research survey total percentage is based on a combination of research and population weights. The percentages of the ESS are similarly calculated using a combination of design and population weights. See European Social Survey (2014, April 25). https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/ESS _weighting_data_1.pdf
- 4.
The internet-based ING International Survey (ING, 2016) only used country population size weights to calculate averages.
- 5.
Results not shown in the tables, but are available from the authors upon request.
- 6.
The work choices results do not have a natural reference category. Using effects coding allows the mean of the possibilities to be the reference category.
- 7.
Individualism vs. collectivism, power distance and indulgence vs. restraint significantly influence voting behaviour if added as individual national explanations. However, their significance disappears if combined with social protection and unemployment. Masculinity, uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation had no effect. Regression results available from the authors upon request.
References
Andersson, J. O., & Kangas, O. (2002). Popular support for basic income in Sweden and Finland. Paper for the BIEN 9th International Congress, Geneva, September 12–14.
Booth, A. L., & Nolen, P. (2012). Gender differences in risk behaviour: does nurture matter? The Economic Journal, 122, F36–F78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02480.x
Borghans, L., Heckman, J. J., Golsteyn, B. H. H., & Meijers, H. (2010). Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(2–3), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.649
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103
Burtless, G. (1986). The work response to a guaranteed income: A survey of experimental evidence. In A. H. Munnell (Ed.), Lessons from the income maintenance experiments (pp. 22–52). Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
Colombo, C., DeRocchi, T., Kurer, T., & Widmer, T. (2016). Analyse der eidgenössischen Abstimmung vom 5. Juni 2016, VOX-Analysen 121. Genf/Zürich: gfs.bern and Institut für Politikwissenschaft der Universität Zürich.
Dalia Research. (2017). The EU’s growing support for basic income. Measuring the change in European support for basic income from April 2016 to March 2017. Berlin: Dalia Research. Accessed June 10, 2019, from https://basicincome.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/DR-2017-survey.pdf
De Wispelaere, J., & Noguera, J. A. (2012). On the political feasibility of universal basic income: An analytic framework. In R. K. Caputo (Ed.), Basic income guarantee and politics: International experiences and perspectives on the viability of income guarantee (pp. 17–38). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Delsen, L. (1997, February). A new concept of full employment. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 18(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X97181007
DeMaris, A. (2002). Explained variance in logistic regression: A Monte Carlo study of proposed measures. Sociological Methods and Research, 31(1), 27–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124102031001002
Dohmen, T. H., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurements, determinants, and behavioural consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
Evers, M., de Mooij, R., & Van Vuuren, D. (2008). The wage elasticity of labour supply: A synthesis of empirical estimates. De Economist, 156(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-007-9080-z
Fitzgerald, R., Bottoni, G., & Swift, S. (2017). The future of welfare: Basic income? Accessed June 8, 2019, from http://citizensincome.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/European-Social-Survey-survey-on-Basic-Income.pdf
Forget, E. (2011). The town with no poverty. Using health administration data to revisit outcomes of a Canadian guaranteed annual income field experiment. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.
Friedman, M. (1969). The optimum quantity of money and other essays. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Gamel, C., Balsan, D., & Vero, J. (2006). The impact of basic income on the propensity to work: Theoretical issues and micro-econometric results. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(3), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.025
Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S. W., & Rubio-Codina, M. (2012). Investing cash transfers to raise long-term living standards. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 164–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.1.164
Gilroy, B. M., Heimann, A., & Schopf, M. (2013). Basic income and labour supply: The German case. Basic Income Studies, 8(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2012-0009
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structures. The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Groot, L. F. M. (1999). Basic income and unemployment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Thela Thesis, Amsterdam.
Haywood, L. (2014). Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen: Eine ökonomische Perspektive, 33, DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research, DIW.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
ING. (2016, October). Helicopter money: Loved but not spent. ING special report.
ING. (2018). Basisinkomen? Meerderheid ziet het eigenlijk niet zitten. ING Financieel fit Barometer, Juli, ING Economisch Bureau.
Ipsos MORI. (2017, September 8). Half of UK adults would support universal basic income in principle. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.04.002.
Kangas, O., Jauhiainen, S., Simanainen, M., & Ylikännö, M. (Eds.). (2019). The basic income experiment 2017–2018 in Finland: Preliminary results. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Accessed June 8, 2019, from http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/161361
Kapteyn, A., & Teppa, F. (2011). Subjective measures of risk aversion, fixed costs, and portfolio choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(4), 564–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.04.002
Killingsworth, M. R. (1983). Labor supply. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Killingsworth, M. R., & Heckman, J. J. (1986). Female labor supply: A survey. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. I, pp. 103–204). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Langer, W. (2017). How to assess the fit of multi-level logit models with Stata? In: Meeting of the German Stata users group. Berlin: Humboldt University. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.17570.32966
Lee, S. (2018). Attitudes toward universal basic income and welfare state in Europe: A research note. Basic Income Studies, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209161
Leininger, A., & Heyne, L. (2017). How representative are referendums? Evidence from 20 years of Swiss referendums. Electoral Studies, 48, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.05.006
Linder, W. (2012). Schweizerische Demokratie. Institutionen – Prozesse – Perspektiven. Bern: Haupt.
Meuleman, B., van Oorschot, W., Baute, S., Delespaul, S., Gugushvili, D., Laenen, T., Roosma, F., & Rossetti, F. (2018, September). The past, present and future of European welfare attitudes: Topline results from round 8 of the European Social Survey. ESS Topline Results Series, Issue 8. Accessed June 8, 2019, from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS8_toplines_issue_8_welfare.pdf
Moffitt, R. A. (1981, April 23–27). The negative income tax: Would it discourage work?. Monthly Labor Review.
Nooteboom, B. (1987). Basic income as a basis for small business. International Small Business Journal, 5(3), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/026624268700500301
Northeastern University. (2018). Optimism and anxiety: Views on the impact of artificial intelligence and higher education’s response, Boston. Accessed June 8, 2019, from https://www.northeastern.edu/gallup/pdf/OptimismAnxietyNortheasternGallup.pdf
Pech, W. J. (2010). Behavioral economics and the basic income guarantee. Basic Income Studies, 5(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1167
Pencavel, J. (1986). Labor supply of men: A survey. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. I, pp. 3–102). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Pfeifer, M. (2009). Public opinion on state responsibility for minimum income protection: A comparison of 14 European countries. Acta Sociologica, 52(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699309104000
Robeyns, I. (2000). Hush money or emancipation fee? In R. van der Veen & L. Groot (Eds.), Basic income on the agenda: Policy objectives and political chances (pp. 121–136). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Robins, P. K. (1985). Comparison of the labor supply findings from the four negative income tax experiments. Journal of Human Resources, 20(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.2307/145685
RSA. (2018). Universal basic income survey. London: The Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce. Accessed June 8, 2019, from https://www.populus.co.uk/2018/08/more-than-twice-as-many-people-support-the-idea-of-a-basic-income-than-oppose-it/
Splendid Research. (2018). Das bedingunslose Grundeinkommen. Eine repräsentativen Umfrage unter 1.024 Deutschen zu Ihrer Meinung zum bedingungslosen Grundeinkommen. Hamburg: Splendid Research.
Standing, G. (2017). Basic income and how we can make it happen. London: Pelican Books.
Tapin, B. M., & McKay, R. T. (2017). The illusion of moral superiority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 623–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616673878
Teppa, F., & Vis, C. (2012). The CentERpanel and the DNB household survey: Methodological aspects. DNB Occasional Studies, 10(4), 1–53.
Torry, M. (2018). Why we need a citizen’s basic income. Bristol: Policy Press.
Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic income: A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vlandas, T. (2018). The politics of universal basic income (UBI). Accessed June 11, 2019, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/netuf/2018/03/07/the-politics-of-universal-basic-income-ubi/
Walter, T. (1989). Basic income: Freedom from poverty, freedom to work. London: Marion Boyars.
Widerquist, K. (2005). A failure to communicate: What (if anything) can we learn from the negative income tax experiments? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(1), 49–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.050
Widerquist, K. (2018). The devil’s in the caveats: A critical analysis of basic income experiments for researchers, policymakers, and citizens. Berkeley: Bepress. Accessed June 8, 2019, from https://works.bepress.com/widerquist/86/
Widerquist, K., Noguera, J. A., Vanderborght, Y., & De Wispelaere, J. (Eds.). (2013). Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research. Chichester: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Delsen, L., Schilpzand, R. (2019). Individual Preferences for the Unconditional Basic Income in the European Union. In: Delsen, L. (eds) Empirical Research on an Unconditional Basic Income in Europe. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30044-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30044-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30043-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30044-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)