Skip to main content

Toward Paradoxical Inconsistency in Electrostatics of Metallic Conductors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Volume 1

Abstract

In a recent report, we drew attention to the paradoxical inconsistency of classical electrostatics with the model of a crystalline conductor. There are different ways to avoid this inconsistency. Mostly, they rely on physical ad hoc assumptions associated with the introduction of additional constants and models of charged liquids. In this report, we suggest another approach, which does not require the introduction of any additional physical constants. The proposed theory includes classical electrostatics as a special case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this and the figures to follow (though its justification remains to be assumed or derived later in this report), one may follow the heuristic rule-of-thumb that dark- and light-gray denote electrically neutral domains and interfaces, respectively, red denotes a domain void of negative charges, while blue denotes an interface comprised solely of mobile negative charges and characterized by a surface charge density.

References

  1. Fedorov, S.V.: Electrodynamic protection against shaped charge weapons: physics aspects of functioning. Vestnik of the Baumann’s Technical University: Mashinostroenie (3) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grinfeld, M., Segletes, S.B.: Toward paradoxical inconsistency in electrostatics of metallic conductors. Technical Report ARL-TR-8365, Army Research Laboratory (US), Aberdeen Proving Ground (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stratton, J.A.: Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw Hill, New York (2008). Originally published 1941

    Google Scholar 

  4. Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media. Pergamon, Oxford (1960)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Grinfeld, P.A., Grinfeld, M.A.: Towards thermodynamics of elastic electric conductors. Phil Mag. A 81(6), 1341–1354 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grinfeld, P.: Introduction to Tensor Analysis and the Calculus of Moving Surfaces. Springer, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Grinfeld, M., Grinfeld, P., Segletes, S.B. (2020). Toward Paradoxical Inconsistency in Electrostatics of Metallic Conductors. In: Lamberson, L. (eds) Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Volume 1. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30021-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30021-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30020-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30021-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics