Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Spaces in Context-Aware Educational Networking Technologies in the Digital Age

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Networking

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

  • 704 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of learning space in the twenty-first century and considers the various contexts in which learning occurs. The increasing growth of digital educational networking technologies has contributed to the need to create and support various forms of learning spaces. These technologies have also transformed the way students engage and interact off- and online. Contemporary learning, as we know, is no longer limited to physical learning spaces. Instead, students engage in various learning spaces. Others extensively leverage opportunities afforded by social network platforms as tools for collaborative and self-directed learning. Students use social networking technologies to engage with content, connect with peers within their social networks and communicate with their teachers. With the increasing prevalence of these technologies, researchers and educators are provided with new opportunities to extend learning from physical spaces to virtual spaces and optimise pedagogical strategies that can support adaptive learning. Our goal in this chapter is to explore the extent to which understanding of learning spaces and contexts contribute to designing better student engagement and possibly better learning outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://teec.teluq.ca/en/

Abbreviations

ADDIE:

Analysis-Design-Development-Implementation-Evaluation

ANR:

National Research Agency

CSCL:

Computer-supported collaborative learning

CAITS:

Context-Aware Intelligent Tutoring System

CDL:

Collaborative Distance Learning

DBR:

Design-based research

FRQSC:

Quebec Research Fund in Society and Culture

ITS:

Intelligent tutoring system

LS:

Learning spaces

MOOC:

Massive open online course

TEEC:

Technology Enhanced and Teaching in Context

References

  • Alterator, S., & Deed, C. (2013). Teacher adaptation to open learning spaces. Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anjou, C., Forissier, T., Bourdeau, J., Mazabraud, Y., Nkambou, R., & Fournier, F. (2017, June). Elaborating the context calculator: A design experiment in geothermy. In International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 513–526). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, P. A. (2012). Design of learning spaces: Emotional and cognitive effects of learning environments in relation to child development. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(1), 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar. Axelrod, S., & Paluska, J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazire, M., & Brézillon, P. (2005, July). Understanding context before using it. In International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 29–40). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Glesinger Hall, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/174879/.

  • Beemer, J., Spoon, K., He, L., Fan, J., & Levine, R. A. (2018). Ensemble learning for estimating individualized treatment effects in student success studies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. (2007). First questions for designing higher education learning spaces. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettini, C., et al. (2010). A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2010, 6(2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddix, J. P. (2011). “Stepping stones”: Career paths to the SSAO for men and women at four-year institutions. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 48(4), 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau, J. (2017, June). The DBR methodology for the study of context in learning. In International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 541–553). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau, J., Forissier, T., Mazabraud, Y., & Nkambou, R. (2015). Web-based context-aware science learning. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 1415–1418). Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: Association for Computer Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2743048

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach: Proceedings of the Second Sussex Conference, 1977 (Vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brézillon, P. (2011). Context and explanation in e-collaborative work. In B. K. Daniel (Ed.), Handbook of research on methods and techniques for studying virtual communities: Paradigms and phenomena (pp. 285–302). IGI Global. Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. C. (2012). Space and consequences: The impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behaviour. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2), n2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. B., & Lippincott, J. K. (2003). Learning spaces: More than meets the eye. Educause Quarterly, 36(1), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. Y., Lai, K. R., Chao, P. Y., Lan, C. H., & Chen, T. H. (2015). Negotiation based adaptive learning sequences: Combining adaptivity and adaptability. Computers & Education, 88, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIBER Group. (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future (CIBER Briefing paper; 9). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, B. K. (2017). Enterprise lecture capture technologies and value to student learning. International Journal of Information & Communication Technologies in Education, 6(2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijicte-2017-0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, B. K. (2019). Big data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deed, C. (2017). Adapting to the virtual campus and transitions in ‘school-less’ teacher education. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), Sage international handbook of research in teacher education. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, A. K., Abowd, G. D., & Salber, D. (2001). A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2–4), 97–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ejigu, D., Scuturici, M., & Brunie, L. (2007, March). An ontology-based approach to context modelling and reasoning in pervasive computing. In Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerComW’07) (pp. 14–19). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erstad, O. (2014). The expanded classroom–Spatial relations in classroom practices using ICT. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(01), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, A. K. (2018). Help seeking: Agentic learners initiating feedback. Educational Review, 70(4), 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forissier, T., et al. (2013). Modeling Context Effects in Science Learning: The CLASH Model. In P. Brézillon, P. Blackburn, & R. Dapoigny (Eds.), CONTEXT 2013 (pp. 330–335). Springer. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J., Vercellotti, M. L., & Folkers, H. (2019). What is in a question? A comparison of student questions in two learning spaces. Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders, 3(1), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2015). Fostering sustained idea improvement with principle-based knowledge building analytic tools. Computers & Education, 89, 91–102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131515001207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. A. (2010). Internet filtering 2.0: Checking intellectual freedom and participative practices at the schoolhouse door. Knowledge Quest, 39(1), 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171478/.

  • Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Firtova, L. (2018, June). Learning Analytics in the Classroom: Comparing Self-assessment, Teacher Assessment and Tests. In International Conference in Methodologies and intelligent Systems for Techhnology Enhanced Learning (pp. 131–138). Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2017). Digital learning design framework for social learning spaces. In Joint Proceedings of the Workshop on Methodology in Learning Analytics (MLA) and the Workshop on Building the Learning Analytics Curriculum (BLAC) co-located with 7th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK 2017). Central Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoué, É., Molinari, G., Prié, Y., & Khezami, S. (2015). Reflection-in-action markers for reflection-on-action in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning settings. Computers & Education, 88, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. W., & Lin, H. C. K. (2019). User acceptance in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment with social network awareness (SNA) support. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K. E., Andrews, V., & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2014). Learning with big data: The future of education. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1993). Notes on formalizing context. Proceeding IJCAI’93 Proceedings of the 13th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 555–560). Chambery, France — August 28 - September 03, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A. J. (2006). Designing blended learning space to the student experience. In Learning spaces. Washington, DC: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miraoui, M. A (2018). Context-aware smart classroom for enhanced learning environment. Retrieved on 23 Oct 2019 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6491/f9ce8a0f3d6b036fa02322ac0c3b4d3a0406.pdf.

  • Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Martínez-Monés, A., Prieto, L. P., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015, September). Bucket-Server: A system for including teacher-controlled flexibility in the management of learning artefacts in across-spaces learning situations. Paper presented at the Tenth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2015), Toledo, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., Gallego-Lema, V., Arribas-Cubero, H. F., Martínez-Monés, A., & Asensio-Pérez, J. I. (2017). Using virtual learning environments in bricolage mode for orchestrating learning situations across physical and virtual spaces. Computers & Education, 109, 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Cristobal, J. A., Prieto, L. P., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Martínez-Mones, A., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013, September). Sharing the burden: Introducing student-centred orchestration in across-spaces learning situations. In Paper Presented at the 8th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL), Paphos, Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8. Retrieved 23 Oct 2019 from https://www-jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2004-8-oblinger/.

  • Oblinger, D. (2005). Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D., & Lippincott, J. K. (2006). Learning spaces. Boulder, Colo,.: EDUCAUSE, c2006. 1 v.(various pagings): illustrations. Retrieved on 23 Oct 2019 from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=bookshel.

  • Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st-century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5) (pp. 1–6). UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psyché V., Anjou C., Fenani W., Bourdeau J., Forissier T., & Nkambou R. (2018). Ontology-Based Context Modelling for Designing a Context-Aware Calculator. Workshop on Context and Culture in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, C. M., Guo, X., & Pursel, B. K. (2017). Leveraging faculty reflective practice to understand active learning spaces: Flashbacks and re-captures. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 183–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwier, R. A., Morrison, D., & Daniel, B. K. (2009). A preliminary investigation of self-directed learning activities in a non-formal blended learning environment. Online Submission. Available https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509957.pdf

  • Scott, K. S., Sorokti, K. H., & Merrell, J. D. (2016). Learning “beyond the classroom” within an enterprise social network system. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 75–90. Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman, G., Cooke, M., Selman, M., & Dampier, P. (1998). The foundations of adult education in Canada (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Thompson Educational Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2012). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2017). The influence of hierarchy and layout geometry in the design of learning spaces. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 59–67.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sottilare, R. A., Baker, R. S., Graesser, A. C., & Lester, J. C. (2018). Special Issue on the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT): Creating a stable and flexible platform for Innovations in AIED research. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(2), 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr-Glass, D. (2018). Building learning spaces. In Online course management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (p. 241). Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global. Hershey.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stockless, A. (2018). Digital education: learning by opening the walls of the class. Revue Internationale sur le numérique en éducation et communication, revue-mediations.teluq.ca, 1(1), P3–P5. Retrieved on 06-02-2019 from https://revue-mediations.teluq.ca/index.php/Distances/article/view/63/31

  • Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis ‘placement’ of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Supporting teachers in guiding collaborating students: Effects of learning analytics in CSCL. Computers & Education, 79, 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K. (2016). Regulative loops, step loops and task loops. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercellotti, M. L. (2018). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of the classroom context. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G., & Randall, M. (2012). The implementation and evaluation of a new learning space: A pilot study. Research in Learning Technology, 20(2), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann. Burlington, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xi, L., Yuan, Z., Yun Qui, B., & Chiang, F. K. (2017). An investigation of university students’ classroom seating choices. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Roger Nkambou for the CAITS architecture, Christine Richard for the figure of the learning scenario and the whole team of the TEEC project for providing the foundations as well as the experimentations of Context-Aware Collaborative Learning Systems. We also thank the following research funding agencies for supporting our work: ANR and FRQSC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TÉLUQ University, Montréal (Québec), Québec, Canada

    Valéry Psyché & Jacqueline Bourdeau

  2. Otago University, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Ben K. Daniel

Authors
  1. Valéry Psyché
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ben K. Daniel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jacqueline Bourdeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valéry Psyché .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. WOLNM, Artificial Intelligence on Education Lab, Mexico City, Mexico, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Zacatenco, Mexico City, Mexico

    Alejandro Peña-Ayala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Psyché, V., Daniel, B.K., Bourdeau, J. (2020). Learning Spaces in Context-Aware Educational Networking Technologies in the Digital Age. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (eds) Educational Networking. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29973-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29973-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29972-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29973-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation