Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Diversity Communication Strategy

  • 1157 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the purpose of this study and its relevance within the fields of business and communication. It tackles past literature on diversity and explains the gaps that the analysis aims to fill. Finally, the chapter discusses the methodology used for this purpose and provides a preview of the forthcoming chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcadipani, R., & de Oliveira Medeiros, C. R. (2019). When corporations cause harm: A critical view of corporate social irresponsibility and corporate crimes. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashikali, T., & Groeneveld, S. (2015). Diversity management in public organizations and its effect on employees’ affective commitment: The role of transformational leadership and the inclusiveness of the organizational culture. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 146–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press. (2018, April 5). Ex-Ford employee awarded $17 million in discrimination case. New York Post. Retrieved from https://nyp.st/2XLAy8d

  • Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2014). From “smart objects” to “social objects”: The next evolutionary step of the internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(1), 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. T., & Kelan, E. K. (2018). HRM practices to diversity management: Individualization, precariousness and precarity. In D. G. Collings, G. T. Wood, & L. T. Szamosi (Eds.), Human resource management; a critical approach (pp. 117–134). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., & Woessmann, L. (2014). Surfing alone? The Internet and social capital: Evidence from an unforeseeable technological mistake. Journal of Public Economics, 117, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg. (2018, September 17). IBM is being sued for age discrimination. Fortune. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2Y4l4vx

  • Bouchillon, B. C. (2014). Social ties and generalized trust, online and in person: Contact or conflict—the mediating role of bonding social capital in America. Social Science Computer Review, 32(4), 506–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchillon, B. C. (2018). Patching the melting pot: Sociability in Facebook groups for engagement, trust, and perceptions of difference. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318791241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., He, H., & Mellahi, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, employee organizational identification, and creative effort: The moderating impact of corporate ability. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 323–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. F. (2018, August 15). Why the gender discrimination lawsuit against Nike is so significant. Vox. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/32LpBCy

  • Carlson, J., Wyllie, J., Rahman, M. M., & Voola, R. (2019). Enhancing brand relationship performance through customer participation and value creation in social media brand communities. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 333–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, J., Porter, L. W., & Moffitt, G. (2006). Workplace diversity and group relations: An overview. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 459–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, N., Nam, K., & Koo, C. (2016). Examining information sharing in social networking communities: Applying theories of social capital and attachment. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciszek, E. (2019/in press). “We are people, not transactions”: Trust as a precursor to dialogue with LGBTQ publics. Public Relations Review. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.02.003

  • Clark, M., Black, H. G., & Judson, K. (2017). Brand community integration and satisfaction with social media sites: A comparative study. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 11(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, S. L., & Ortman, J. M. (2015). Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060. US Census Bureau, 9, 1–13. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/09c9/ad858a60f9be2d6966ebd0bc267af5a76321.pdf

  • Dass, S., Sethi, R., Popli, S., & Saxena, V. N. (2019, in press). Drivers of brand engagement: The role of brand communities. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919825516.

  • Deetz, S. A. (2004). Critical theory. In S. May & D. Mumby (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. G. (2016). Boomerang politics: How transnational stakeholders impact multinational corporations in the context of globalization. In A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility (pp. 321–338). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, 94(7). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/28KAo2R

  • Downey, S. N., van der Werff, L., Thomas, K. M., & Plaut, V. C. (2015). The role of diversity practices and inclusion in promoting trust and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, M. L., & Bendick Jr., M. (2003). Workforce diversity initiatives of U.S. multinational corporations in Europe. Thunderbird International Review, 46(6), 701–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einwiller, A. A., & Steilen, S. (2015). Handling complaints on social network sites- An analysis of complaints and complaints responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relations Review, 41, 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield, M. (2018). The ground for inclusion: Diversity and interdependence. Gestalt Journal of Australia and New Zealand, 14(2), 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdman, B. M. (2018). Incorporating diversity and inclusion as core values in organization development practice. In D. W. Jamieson, A. H. Church, & J. D. Vogelsang (Eds.), Enacting values-based change: Organization development in action (pp. 157–167). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes Couching Council. (2018, February 27). Here comes Gen Z: How to attract and retain the workforce’s newest generation. Forbes. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2McbPmJ

  • Grabowicz, P. A., Aiello, L. M., Eguíluz, V. M., & Jaimes, A. (2013). Distinguishing topical and social groups based on common identity and bond theory. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 627–636). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, M. (2016). Diversity in international policy on educational equity and inclusion of social groups: A case of 77 state parties to the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 27. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Ni1iXV

  • Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., Grewal, D., Wulf, J., & Schoegel, M. (2019). Detecting, preventing, and mitigating online firestorms in brand communities. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, D. L., Lankau, M. J., Chrobot-Mason, D., Mollica, K. A., & Friedman, R. A. (2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(1), 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Omanović, V. (2016). (Mis) managing diversity: Exploring the dangers of diversity management orthodoxy. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korschun, D., & Du, S. (2013). How virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value: A framework and propositions. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1494–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T. (2014). Working below and above the line: The research–practice gap in diversity Management. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(2), 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Kirkpatrick-Husk, K., & Madhavan, R. (2017). Diversity in alliance portfolios and performance outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1472–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, V. M., Irigaray, H. A. R., & Lourenco, C. (2019). Consumer engagement on social media: Insights from a virtual brand community. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 22(1), 14–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Liu, R., Lee, M., & Chen, J. (2019). When will consumers be ready? A psychological perspective on consumer engagement in social media brand communities. Internet Research, 29 (4), 704–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Son, M., Wenzel, A., An, Z., Zhao Martin, N., Nah, S., et al. (2018). Bridging mechanisms in multiethnic communities: Place-based communication, neighborhood belonging, and intergroup relations. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 11(1), 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madera, J. M. (2013). Best practices in diversity management in customer service Organizations: An investigation of top companies cited by Diversity Inc. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(2), 124–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 3351–3365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiorescu, R. (2013). Blogging at Mercedes-Benz. A mixed-method approach to assess corporate identity convergence in online settings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Purdue University, West-Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiorescu, R. D., & Wrigley, B. J. (2016). Diversity in multinational corporations. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matei, S. A., & Bruno, R. J. (2015). Pareto’s 80/20 law and social differentiation: A social entropy perspective. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzei, A., & Ravazzani, S. (2008, January 25–26). Leveraging differences for competition: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the 7th international congress on marketing trends. Venice, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, M., Steele, S., & Stuckler, D. (2019). The hidden power of corporations. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2St7GLT

  • McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (2015). Communication models for the study of mass communications. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E. (2015). Inclusion is the key to diversity management, but what is Inclusion? Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership and Governance, 39(2), 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, D. E. (2015). Diversity 2.0: How the public relation function can take the lead in a new generation of diversity and inclusion (DandI) initiative. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 2(2), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, D. E. (2016). Bridging the divide: A multidisciplinary analysis of diversity research and the implications for public relations. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations, 3(1). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2PUF50l

  • Nitins, T., & Burgess, J. (2014). Twitter, brands, and user engagement. In Twitter and society (Vol. 89, pp. 293–304). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk, M. B., & Tatli, A. (2016). Gender identity inclusion in the workplace: broadening diversity management research and practice through the case of transgender employees in the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(8), 781–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulis, K., & Poulis, E. (2016). Problematizing fit and survival: transforming the law of requisite variety through complexity misalignment. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachele, J. S. (2017). Dismantling diversity management: Introducing an ethical performance improvement campaign. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., et al. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, W., Robertson, N., McQuilken, L., & Ferdous, A. S. (2019, in press). Consumer engagement on Twitter: Perceptions of the brand matter. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2017-0772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L. G., Kiesler, S. B., Riedl, J., et al. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Mis Quarterly, 36(3), 841–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberge, M.-E., Lewicki, R. J., Hietapelto, A., & Abdyldaeva, A. (2011). From theory to practice: Recommending supportive diversity practices. Journal of Diversity Management, 6(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggs, E. N., Walker, S. S., Blanchard, A., & Gur, S. (2016). Online exclusion: Biases that may arise when using social media in talent acquisition. In Social Media in Employee Selection and Recruitment (pp. 289–305). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabenland, C., & Tomlinson, F. (2015). Shadows and light: Diversity management as Phantasmagoria. Human Relations, 68(12), 1913–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoobridge, G. E. (2006). Multi-ethnic workforce and business performance: Review and synthesis of the empirical literature. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 92–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V., & Point, S. (2004). Strategic responses by European companies to the diversity challenge: An online comparison. Long Range Planning, 37, 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, D. G., & Newman, K. P. (2019). Reducing consumer loneliness through brand communities. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(2), 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Yang, A. (2018). Notes on a dialogue: Twenty years of digital dialogic communication research in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30, 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (Eds.). (2019). The global public relations handbook. Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R., Gilliard-Matthews, S., Dunaev, J., Woods, M. K., & Brawner, B. M. (2017). The digital hood: Social media use among youth in disadvantaged neighborhoods. New Media & Society, 19(6), 950–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. R. (2002). Diversity programs: Attitude and realities in the contemporary corporate environment. Corporate Communications, 7(4), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tausczik, Y. R., Dabbish, L. A., & Kraut, R. E. (2014). Building loyalty to online communities through bond and identity-based attachment to sub-groups. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 146–157). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Kent, M. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodorakopoulos, N., & Budhwar, P. (2015). Diversity and inclusion in different work settings: Emerging patterns, challenges, and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 54, 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trittin, H., & Schoeneborn, D. (2017). Diversity as polyphony: Reconceptualizing diversity management from a communication-centered perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2019). EEOC releases fiscal year 2018 enforcement and litigation data. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2YZ2F07

  • Uysal, N. (2013). Shifting the paradigm: Diversity communication on corporate web sites. Public Relations Journal, 7(2), 8–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vespa, J., Armstrong, D. M., & Medina, L. (2018). Demographic turning points for the United States: Population projections for 2020 to 2060. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. (2011). The hyperlinked organization. In R. Levine, C. Locke, D. Searls, & D. Weinberger (Eds.), The cluetrain manifesto. Tenth anniversary edition (pp. 187–205). New York: Perseus Books Groups.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczner, J. (2017, June 7). The Fortune 500s 10 most profitable companies. Fortune. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2sD2CaG

  • Windscheid, L., Bowes-Sperry, L., Mazei, J., & Morner, M. (2017). The paradox of diversity initiatives: When organizational needs differ from employee preferences. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondrak, M., & Segert, A. (2015). Using the Diversity Impact Navigator to move from interventions towards diversity management strategies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrench, J. (2005). Diversity management can be bad for you. Institute of Race Relations, 46(3), 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B., Ren, Y., Terveen, L., & Zhu, H. (2017). Predicting member productivity and withdrawal from pre-joining attachments in online production groups. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 1775–1784). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Emerson College, Boston, MA, USA

    Roxana D. Maiorescu-Murphy

Authors
  1. Roxana D. Maiorescu-Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roxana D. Maiorescu-Murphy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maiorescu-Murphy, R.D. (2020). Introduction. In: Corporate Diversity Communication Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29944-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation