Advertisement

Fundamentals of Serious Games

  • Nathanaël MaugardEmail author
Chapter
  • 235 Downloads
Part of the Security Informatics and Law Enforcement book series (SILE)

Abstract

Serious games are a powerful learning tool experiencing increasing popularity as they present a cost-effective alternative to classroom-based learning for knowledge acquisition as well as perceptual, cognitive, behavioural, affective, motivational, physiological and social learning outcomes. Serious game designers employ learning theories to ensure the effectiveness of the end product for intended learning outcomes. Additionally, research has also been conducted to create a formal and iterative framework facilitating game production and development. However, there are also quality considerations and pitfalls to serious games. This chapter discusses the conceptual foundations of serious games as well as their benefits and challenges. It will further present case studies of serious games to showcase the large variety of types and design choices.

Keywords

Serious games Game-based learning Learning theories Benefits of serious games Case studies 

References

  1. Ackermann, E., Gauntlett, D., & Weckstrom, C. (2009). Defining systematic creativity. Billund, Denmark: Lego Learning Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich, C. (2002), A field guide to educational simulations, Learning Circuits. American Society for Training and Development. Retrieved from http://www.simulearn.net/pdf/astd.pdf
  3. Aldrich, C. (2009). The complete guide to simulations and serious games: How the most valuable content will be created in the age beyond Gutenberg to Google. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Alzheimer’s Research UK. (2019). The mobile game that can detect Alzheimer’s risk | Alzheimer’s Research UK. Retrieved from https://www.alzheimersresearchuk.org/the-mobile-game-that-can-detect-alzheimers-risk/
  5. Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., et al. (2015). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391–411.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellotti, F., Berta, R., Gloria, A., Ott, M., Arnab, S., Freitas, S., et al. (2011). Designing serious games for education: From pedagogical principles to game mechanisms. Reading, UK: Academic Publ. Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::26aa8b2fde8194dbf4685876a7dd10bcGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, A., Klein, M., & Malone, T. W. (2012). Programming the global brain. Communications of the ACM, 55(5), 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilateral Negotiation Trainer (BiLAT). (2012). Retrieved from http://ict.usc.edu/prototypes/bilat/
  10. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  11. Boyle, A. (2011). Gamers solve molecular puzzle that baffled scientists. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/gamers-solve-molecular-puzzle-baffled-scientists-f6C10402813
  12. Boyle, E., Connolly, T. M., & Hainey, T. (2011). The role of psychology in understanding the impact of computer games. https://doi-org.lcproxy.shu.ac.uk/10.1016/j.entcom.2010.12.002
  13. Breuer, J., & Bente, G. (2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1), 7–24. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00692052Google Scholar
  14. Bushner, A. (2015). Press A to Retry: Teaching and motivating players through failure in difficult games. (Master’s thesis, Purdue University). Retrived from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_theses/1095
  15. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, S., Treuille, A., Barbero, J., Leaver-Fay, A., Tuite, K., Khatib, F., et al. (2010, June). The challenge of designing scientific discovery games. In proceedings of the fifth international conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 40–47). ACM.Google Scholar
  17. Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 715–730.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darvasi, P. (2016). Empathy, perspective and complicity: How digital games can support peace education and conflict resolution. New Delhi, India: UNESCO MGIEP. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259928Google Scholar
  19. Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J. P., & Rampnoux, O. (2011). Origins of serious games. In Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 25–43). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Driskell, J. E., & Dwyer, D. J. (1984). Microcomputer videogame based training. Educational Technology, 24(2), 11–16. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44427307Google Scholar
  21. Federation of American Scientists. (2006). Summit on educational games: Harnessing the power of video games for learning. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/programs/ltp/policy_and_publications/summit/Summit%20on%20Educational%20Games.pdf
  22. Freudmann, E. A., & Bakamitsos, Y. (2014). The role of gamification in non-profit marketing: An information processing account. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 567–572.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Game Accessibility. (2019). About game accessibility. Retrieved from https://www.game-accessibility.com/about/
  24. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geary, D. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50(1), 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gee, D. (2007). Informed choice? Armed forces recruitment practice in the United Kingdom. https://www.forceswatch.net/resource/informed-choice-armed-forces-recruitment-practice-in-the-united-kingdom/
  27. Gee, D. (2013). The Last Ambush? Aspects of mental health in the British armed forces. Forces Watch. Available at: http://www.forceswatch.net/resources/last-ambush-aspects-mental-health-british-armed-forces. Accessed 2 June 2015. Google Scholar.
  28. Habgood, M. P. J., Ainsworth, S. E., & Benford, S. (2005). Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games. Simulation & Gaming, 36(4), 483–498.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878105282276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, C. (2009). Call to duty: Army launches start thinking soldier campaign. Retrieved from https://www.pocket-lint.com/games/news/activision/94882-british-army-start-thinking-soldier
  30. Ketamo, H., & Kiili, K. (2010). Conceptual change takes time: Game based learning cannot be only supplementary amusement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 399. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/854589835Google Scholar
  31. Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., et al. (2011). Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18(10), 1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kidd, J. (2015). Museums are using virtual reality to preserve the past – before it’s too late. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/museums-are-using-virtual-reality-to-preserve-the-past-before-its-too-late-44600
  33. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Livingston, G., Sommerlad, A., Orgeta, V., Costafreda, S. G., Huntley, J., Ames, D., ... & Cooper, C. (2017). Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. The Lancet, 390(10113), 2673–2734.Google Scholar
  37. Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behaviour modification. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 6(4), 185–192.Google Scholar
  39. Michael, D. R., & Chen, S. L. (2005). Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Roseville, CA: Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade.Google Scholar
  40. Orji, R., Vassileva, J., & Mandryk, R. (2014). Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 24(5), 453–498.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-014-9149-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parker, L. E., & Lepper, M. R. (1992). Effects of fantasy contexts on children’s learning and motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 625–633.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pederson, C. C. (2010a). Trauma and agitation: Video games in a time of war. Afterimage: The Journal of Media Arts and Cultural Criticism, 38(2), 9–13.Google Scholar
  43. Pederson, C. C. (2010b). The museology of computergames—an interview with the curator of the computerspiele museum, Andreas Lange, and art historian and archivist Dr. Winfried Bergmeyer, Berlin. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1), 87–100.Google Scholar
  44. Protopsaltis, A. (n.d.). Learning theories and serious games [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.meducator.net/dissemination.activities/files/163.pdf
  45. Rayner, A. (2018, March 18). Are video games just propaganda and training tools for the military? The Guardian. Retrived from https://www.theguardian.com/t
  46. Sánchez, R. (2005). Matari 69200 [Video game based installation] Daniel Langlois Foundation. (2009 November 7– 2009 December 12).Google Scholar
  47. Sanford, K., Starr, L. J., Merkel, L., & Bonsor Kurki, S. (2015). Serious games: Video games for good? E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(1), 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saunders, J., & Gibson, H. (2018). Unpacked refugee and virtual reality at UNICEF headquarters in New York. The C3RI Impact Blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.shu.ac.uk/c3riimpact/centric-unpacked-refugee-vr-blog/
  49. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.Google Scholar
  50. Simpson, E. (1972). The psychomotor domain. Washington, DC: Gryphon House.Google Scholar
  51. Skinner, B. F. (1990). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Cambridge, MA: BF Skinner Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (2012, March 8). The Art of Video Games: Exhibition Trailer [Video file]. Retrived from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gXrCEzuAis
  53. Strand, S., & Berndtsson, J. (2015). Recruiting the “enterprising soldier”: Military recruitment discourses in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Critical Military Studies, 1(3), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Taylor, M. (2009, September 27). Army recruitment surge due to patriotism and recession. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/
  56. Thompson, M. (2008). Killing in the name of: The US army and video games. Retrieved from https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2008/12/army-video-games/
  57. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Wilkinson, P. (2016). A brief history of serious games. In Entertainment computing and serious games (pp. 17–41). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J. L., et al. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 217–266.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108321866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winn, B. M. (2009). The design, play, and experience framework. In Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1010–1024). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Health Organization. (2019). 10 facts on dementia. Retrieved 4 June 2019, from https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/dementia/en/
  62. Wu, W., Hsiao, H., Wu, P., Lin, C., & Huang, S. (2012). Investigating the learning-theory foundations of game-based learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 265–279.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00437.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yusoff, A., Crowder, R., Gilbert, L., & Wills, G. (2009, July). A conceptual framework for serious games. Paper presented at the 21–23.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2009.19. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5194153

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CENTRIC, Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations