Skip to main content

AEsOP: Applied Engagement for Community Participation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Serious Games for Enhancing Law Enforcement Agencies

Part of the book series: Security Informatics and Law Enforcement ((SILE))

  • 622 Accesses

Abstract

AEsOP (Applied Engagement for Community Participation) is a serious game that was developed as part of a study to examine whether interactive video games can have a quantifiable positive impact on levels of civic engagement with public authorities. The game was created with the objective of providing a tool that can be used to engage with communities including those that traditionally are underrepresented, lack ‘voice’ or feel underacknowledged by police and perhaps where trust relationships with public authorities may need improvement. The game was thus developed with a double focus: as engagement tool as well as a setting for research. This chapter discusses the conceptual thinking that went into the game as well as how the practical challenge of improving community-police relationships informed the design of the game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Project funded under the EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme, grant agreement no. 653729 (May 2015-April 2018); for more information see www.unity-project.eu

  2. 2.

    https://unity.com/

  3. 3.

    https://www.inklestudios.com/ink/

References

  • Bain, A., Robinson, B. K., & Conser, J. (2014). Perceptions of policing: Improving communication in local communities. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 16(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2014.16.4.345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayerl, P. S., van der Giessen, M., & Jacobs, G. (2016). Unity – 1st stakeholder analysis – shared themes and concepts. Deliverable 3.3 of the Unity project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 653729. Available at: https://www.unity-project.eu/index.php/documents/

  • Brewster, B., Gibson, H., & Gunning, M. (2018). Policing the community together: The impact of technology on citizen engagement. In G. Levantakis & M. Haberfeld (Eds.), Societal implications of community-oriented policing technology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, M., & Laycock, G. (2002). Crime prevention in Australia: Issues in policy and research. In A. Graycar & P. Grabosky (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Australian criminology. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordner, G. W. (2014). Community policing. In M. D. Reisig & R. J. Kane (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of police and policing (pp. 148–171). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devisch, O., Poplin, A., & Sofronie, S. (2016). The gamification of civic participation: Two experiments in improving the skills of citizens to reflect collectively on spatial issues. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1102419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K., & Foster, J. (2009). Citizen focus and community engagement. The Police Foundation, 1, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morash, M., & Ford, K. J. (2002). The move to community policing: Making change happen. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. (1997). Crime prevention and police. In P. O’Malley & A. Sutton (Eds.), Crime prevention in Australia: Issues in policy and research. Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segrave, M., & Ratcliffe, J. (2004). Community policing: A descriptive overview. Australian Institute of Criminology. Available via https://aic.gov.au/publications/archive/community-policing%2D%2Da-descriptive-overview

  • Sherman, L. W. (1998). Policing for crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman et al. (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising (pp. 267–306). College Park, MD: University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, L. M., Aston, A. L., Bayerl, P. S., Marzell, L., McCrone, N., Ayora, C., Jukarainen, P., Allertseder, S., & Mavrov, B. (2018). Unity project report. Deliverable 1.3 of the Unity project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 653729. Available at: https://www.unity-project.eu/index.php/documents/

  • Watson, E. M., Stone, A. R., & DeLuca, S. M. (1998). Strategies for community policing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Hancock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hancock, P., Gibson, H., Akhgar, B. (2019). AEsOP: Applied Engagement for Community Participation. In: Akhgar, B. (eds) Serious Games for Enhancing Law Enforcement Agencies. Security Informatics and Law Enforcement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29926-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics