Skip to main content

Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter identifies core principles of ecology and environmental science applicable to the nexus and discusses the tightly coupled socio-ecological systems that establish ecosystems services (ES) within the nexus. The chapter begins by outlining key ecological principles and their interdependencies, demonstrating how ecosystem services are provided related to food, energy, and water. It then illustrates how ecosystems and ecosystem services are valued with respect to the nexus. Next, it outlines the relationship of ecosystem services to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (see Sect. 3.7) before concluding with a case study examining the importance of ecosystem services in erosion control services and conservation agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allan, T., & Matthews, N. (2016). The water, energy and food nexus and ecosystems: The political economy of food non-food supply chains. In F. Dodds & J. Bartram (Eds.), The water, food, energy and climate nexus: Challenges and an agenda for action (pp. 78–89). Routledge - Earthscan: Oxon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. A. & D’Souza, S., 2014. From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: A literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187, pp.116–132. Retrieved January 5, 2015, from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167880913002685.

  • Aylward, B., Bandyopadhyay, J., Belausteguigotia, J. C., Borkey, P., Cassar, A. Z., Meadors, L., Saade, L., Siebentritt, M., Stein, R., Tognetti, S., & Tortajada, C. (2005). Freshwater ecosystem services. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Policy Responses, 3, 213–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., Matthews, N., & Zhang, W. (2016). Opportunities for improved promotion of ecosystem services in agriculture under the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0366-9.

  • Bockstael, N. E., Freeman, A. M., Kopp, R. J., Portney, P. R. & Smith, V. K. (2000). On measuring economic values for nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, L. G., Andraski, T. W., & Wolkowski, R. P. (1993). Nitrogen credits in soybean-corn crop sequences on three soils. Agronomy Journal, 85, 1061–1067.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., Stanley, E. H., & Vander Zanden, M. J. (2011). State of the world’s freshwater ecosystems: Physical, chemical, and biological changes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). (1992). CBD convention text. Retrieved March 15, 2017, from http://www.cbd.int/convention/text

  • Costanza, R., Fioramonti, L., & Kubiszewski, I. (2016). The UN sustainable development goals and the dynamics of well-being. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 59. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. C., Söderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P. R., Folke, C., Jansson, A., Jansson, B. O., Kautsky, N., & Levin, S. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289(5478), 395–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeClerck, F. A. J., Jones, S., Attwood, S., Bossio, D., Girvetz, E., Chaplin-Kramer, B., Enfors, E., Fremier, A., Gordon, L. J., Kizito, F., Lopez Noriega, I., Matthews, N., McCartney, M., Meacham, M., Noble, A., Quintero, M., Remans, R., Soppe, R., Willemen, L., Wood, S., & Zhang, W. (2016). Agricultural ecosystems and their services: The vanguard of sustainability? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 23(December 2016), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M. (2003). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods (2nd ed.). Washington DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICSU ISSC. (2015). Review of the sustainable development goals: The science perspective. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU). Retrieved March 23, 2016, from http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/review-of-targets-for-the-sustainable-development-goals-the-science-perspective-2015/SDG-Report.pdf

  • Lavelle, P. (1997). Faunal activities and soil processes: Adaptive strategies that determine ecosystem function. Advances in Ecological Research, 27, 93–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey, J. E. & Vaughan, M. (2006). The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience, 56(4), 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, N. (2016). People and freshwater ecosystems: Pressures, responses, and resilience. Aquatic Procedia, 6, 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R. (2007). Dirt: The erosion of civilizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannell, D. J., et al. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46(11), 1407. Retrieved from http://www.publish.csiro.au/?paper=EA05037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (1998). Cost benefit analysis and environmental policy. Oxford review of economic policy, 14(4), 84–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Wilson, C., McCullum, C., Huang, R., Dwen, P., Flack, J., Tran, Q., Saltman, T., & Cliff, B. (1997). Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience, 47(11), 747–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringler, C., Willenbockel, D., Perez, N., Rosegrant, M., Zhu, T., & Matthews, N. (2016). Global linkages among energy, food, and water: An economic assessment. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(1), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiferaw, B., Freeman, H. A., & Navrud, S. (2005). Valuation methods and approaches for assessing natural resource management impacts. In B. Shiferaw, H. A. Freeman, & S. M. Swinton (Eds.), Natural resource management in agriculture: Methods for assessing economic and environmental impacts (pp. 19–51). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sukhdev, P., May, P., & Müller, A. (2016). Fix food metrics. Nature, 540, 33–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swinton, S. M., & Zhang, W. (2005). Rethinking ecosystem services from an intermediate product perspective. Selected paper, the annual meeting of American Agricultural Economics Association, Providence, Rhode Island, July 24–27, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S. E., Sullivan, C. A., Reidy Liermann, C., & Davies, P. M. (2010). Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Salt, D., & Reid, W. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining people and ecosystems in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. S., Bell, A. R., & Parkhurst, G. M. (2015). Heterogeneous preferences and the effects of incentives in promoting conservation agriculture in Malawi, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/129169

  • Wood, S. L., & DeClerck, F. (2015). Ecosystems and human well-being in the Sustainable Development Goals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 13, 123. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295-13.3.123.

  • Wood, S. L., Jones, S. K., Johnson, J. A., Brauman, K. A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Fremier, A., Girvetz, E., Gordon, L. J., Kappel, C. V., Mandle, L. & Mulligan, M. (2018). Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosystem services, 29, 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Energy Council. (2016). World energy resources. Retrieved September 26, 2018, from https://www.worldenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/World-Energy-Resources-Full-report-2016.10.03.pdf

  • Zhang, W., & Swinton, S. M. (2009). Incorporating natural enemies in an economic threshold for dynamically optimal pest management. Ecological Modeling, 220, 1315–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Swinton, S. M. (2012). Optimal control of soybean aphid in the presence of natural enemies and the implied value of their ecosystem services ecological economics. Journal of Environmental Management, 96(1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathanial Matthews .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matthews, N., Zhang, W., Bell, A.R., Treemore-Spears, L. (2020). Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services. In: Saundry, P., Ruddell, B. (eds) The Food-Energy-Water Nexus. AESS Interdisciplinary Environmental Studies and Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29914-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics