Skip to main content

Aleatoric Dynamic Epistemic Logic for Learning Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI 2019: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11670))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2159 Accesses

Abstract

We propose a generalisation of dynamic epistemic logic, where propositions are aleatoric: that is, rather than having true/false values, propositions have odds of being true. Agents in such a system suppose a probability distribution of possible worlds, and based on observations are able to refine this probability distribution to match their observations. We demonstrate this logic with respect to some games of chance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.indieboardsandcards.com/resistance.php.

References

  1. Baltag, A., Smets, S.: Group belief dynamics under iterated revision: fixed points and cycles of joint upgrades. In: Proceedings of the 12th TARK, pp. 41–50 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A., Smets, S.: Probabilistic dynamic belief revision. Synthese 165(2), 179 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. van Benthem, J., Gerbrandy, J., Kooi, B.: Dynamic update with probabilities. Stud. Logica 93(1), 67–96 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bovens, L., Hartmann, S.: Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaum, D.: The dining cryptographers problem: unconditional sender and recipient untraceability. J. Cryptol. 1(1), 65–75 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cocchiarella, N.B., Freund, M.A.: Modal Logic: An Introduction to Its Syntax and Semantics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dechesne, F., Wang, Y.: To know or not to know: epistemic approaches to security protocol verification. Synthese 177(1), 51–76 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library, vol. 337. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. van Eijck, J., Schwarzentruber, F.: Epistemic probability logic simplified. In: Proceedings of AiML, pp. 158–177 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Megiddo, N.: A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Inf. Comput. 87(1–2), 78–128 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. French, T., Gozzard, A., Reynolds, M.: A modal aleatoric calculus for probabilistic reasoning. In: Khan, M.A., Manuel, A. (eds.) ICLA 2019. LNCS, vol. 11600, pp. 52–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58771-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerbrandy, J.: The surprise examination. Synthese 155(1), 21–33 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Halpern, J.Y.: Reasoning About Uncertainty. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kooi, B.P.: Probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 12(4), 381–408 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Plaza, J.: Logics of public communications. In: Proceedings of the 4th ISMIS, pp. 201–216. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sack, J.: Extending probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic. Synthese 169(2), 241–257 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shafer, G.: Dempster-shafer theory. In: Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 330–331 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. In: Zadeh, L.A. (ed.) Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers, pp. 394–432. World Scientific (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim French .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

French, T., Gozzard, A., Reynolds, M. (2019). Aleatoric Dynamic Epistemic Logic for Learning Agents. In: Nayak, A., Sharma, A. (eds) PRICAI 2019: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11670. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29908-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29908-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29907-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29908-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics